Sandra Vi going for record across America

Results wrote:

At no point have I seen the Garmin show 14 mph for ANYONE which is what your infallible Race Drone was doing yesterday.

Sandra Vi's has a 14+ somewhere. I clicked on it earlier today. Knew I should have taken a screen grab! I'll try and find it again.

Scam_Watcheroo wrote:

Results wrote:

What was the point of being able to see the support cars anyway? I believe we were only able to see two of three as well.

So now with the Garmin you have no idea where any of the vehicles are and Mimi could be riding in any one of them. Great.

For the car to spoof the data in real-time it would have to be driving down the road at 3-5 mph. In the Rural USA that will draw the attention of the police and you will be pulled over: "This is a 50 mph road, not 5," said the officer. They would have to faking the data as you have shown could be done. Random boots are needed to see if the RY approach is being used.

On the Road Again wrote:

Scam_Watcheroo wrote:

So now with the Garmin you have no idea where any of the vehicles are and Mimi could be riding in any one of them. Great.

For the car to spoof the data in real-time it would have to be driving down the road at 3-5 mph. In the Rural USA that will draw the attention of the police and you will be pulled over: "This is a 50 mph road, not 5," said the officer. They would have to faking the data as you have shown could be done. Random boots are needed to see if the RY approach is being used.

That's what RY was doing remember! Dustin was driving the RV at running speed with Robbie inside, and sometimes forgot to go slow enough and logged many silly speeds downhill before braking! Dustin you had ONE job - to drive the RV at running speed

Gary's Guardian wrote:

FWIW, Andy. Your a snivelling runt. You're back pedalling now: Oh, I love you, Gary. You go running to Admin on here to get posts deleted while you're calling people all sorts. You're pathetic. You're an embarrassment to Tallaght AC and your family.

At least I've never cheated on a partner or someone dear to me - I might be a prick but one with a line I won't cross.

If ye want to keep going down this road fair enough...,

Also I don't doxx

Sandra doing 16.47mph:

https://imgur.com/a/foo7J

There's something else I noticed while dot-clicking to find that too: The same speeds keep cropping up again and again in batches, say 3.17, 3.17, 3.17, 3.74, 3.74, 3.17, 3.17, 3.17 … Now if a runner is keeping a steady pace I can kinda understand this, but this is to .01 mph, and oddly returning again and again to exactly the same 2 decimal place speeds. It seems to have some 'favorite' speeds it keeps retuning to.

Now I don't think anything fishy is going on here, and mention this only to suggest as SW has that the GPS data we see plotted is not gospel. I assume Garmin do some kind of interpolation or smoothing.

You still here Wowzer or WCH ?

Curious what your PBs are cause I've all of them beat.... at every distance and I'm a slow old troll lol

GPYES wrote:

Sandra doing 16.47mph:

https://imgur.com/a/foo7J

There's something else I noticed while dot-clicking to find that too: The same speeds keep cropping up again and again in batches, say 3.17, 3.17, 3.17, 3.74, 3.74, 3.17, 3.17, 3.17 … Now if a runner is keeping a steady pace I can kinda understand this, but this is to .01 mph, and oddly returning again and again to exactly the same 2 decimal place speeds. It seems to have some 'favorite' speeds it keeps retuning to.

Now I don't think anything fishy is going on here, and mention this only to suggest as SW has that the GPS data we see plotted is not gospel. I assume Garmin do some kind of interpolation or smoothing.

I await an apology from all the trolls and URC to say that I am right.

GPYES wrote:

Sandra doing 16.47mph:

https://imgur.com/a/foo7J

There's something else I noticed while dot-clicking to find that too: The same speeds keep cropping up again and again in batches, say 3.17, 3.17, 3.17, 3.74, 3.74, 3.17, 3.17, 3.17 … Now if a runner is keeping a steady pace I can kinda understand this, but this is to .01 mph, and oddly returning again and again to exactly the same 2 decimal place speeds. It seems to have some 'favorite' speeds it keeps retuning to.

Now I don't think anything fishy is going on here, and mention this only to suggest as SW has that the GPS data we see plotted is not gospel. I assume Garmin do some kind of interpolation or smoothing.

I apologize to you and Scam_Watcheroo. Thank you for finding it GPYES.

I still think this is an improvement. I believe that with the addition of the Garmin and Mimi's move towards more population (and other runners) we will have a better idea if this attempt is real or not. Let's Run has no excuse now to not meet up and join her, but I know from past experience it is unlikely anyone will. I expect that going forward we will find that she really is running every mile and doing it herself. Now the question will be if she can keep it up or will she break like Rob Young? I believe she will do it.

Scam_Watcheroo are you upset because this makes Mimi's run more legitimate? Whatever happened to the fake Stravas you were going to make? I agree with the good folks on URC that cadence is another strong piece of evidence in favor of Mimi. Rob, sitting in an RV, obviously didn't have that.

Results wrote:

Scam_Watcheroo are you upset because this makes Mimi's run more legitimate? Whatever happened to the fake Stravas you were going to make? I agree with the good folks on URC that cadence is another strong piece of evidence in favor of Mimi. Rob, sitting in an RV, obviously didn't have that.

I'm upset because you trolls a URC are acting like a herd of sheep that have no idea what their doing and is impressed more by shiny graphics rather than addressing the real issue and causing Race Drone to pull out of Mimi's transcon as a sponsor.

Results wrote:

… another strong piece of evidence …

Exactly: ANOTHER. None of what data we glean can be taken in isolation as definitive proof for either or any attempt.

And I want to believe!

Oh, and the spoofs will be coming as I said before that I need some time to create my own tools to do it the way I want. Mimi didn't run across the USA in a day, you know?

Scam_Watcheroo wrote:

Oh, and the spoofs will be coming as I said before that I need some time to create my own tools to do it the way I want. Mimi didn't run across the USA in a day, you know?

Cool I look fwd to seeing it.

GPYES wrote:

Results wrote:

… another strong piece of evidence …

Exactly: ANOTHER. None of what data we glean can be taken in isolation as definitive proof for either or any attempt.

And I want to believe!

So you think this is legit now?

How will we know you spoofed them and didn't go out there and generate the data by running across the states?

Scam, you are going to tee off a lot of folks with your recent marathon record. You put up some blazing times on some of those Strava segments and shook up some leader boards!

Scam_Watcheroo wrote:

GPYES wrote:

Sandra doing 16.47mph:

https://imgur.com/a/foo7J

There's something else I noticed while dot-clicking to find that too: The same speeds keep cropping up again and again in batches, say 3.17, 3.17, 3.17, 3.74, 3.74, 3.17, 3.17, 3.17 … Now if a runner is keeping a steady pace I can kinda understand this, but this is to .01 mph, and oddly returning again and again to exactly the same 2 decimal place speeds. It seems to have some 'favorite' speeds it keeps retuning to.

Now I don't think anything fishy is going on here, and mention this only to suggest as SW has that the GPS data we see plotted is not gospel. I assume Garmin do some kind of interpolation or smoothing.

I await an apology from all the trolls and URC to say that I am right.

Mimi has the same issues. The 16.47 was followed by 9.52, 0.00, 5.00. Preceding points are 4.37, 6.27, and 5.64. So, yes, two points fast and one stop.

Mimi has stopped tracking on her Garmin. The breadcrumb part.

https://imgur.com/a/3kjMr