Women runs 520 miles on treadmill in 7 days but doesn't get WR as Guinness says her witness doesn't count

ExpertKipWatcher wrote:

LLCoolK wrote:

he doesnt have to prove anything to you. just shut the hell up and sign the petition

This is the bit that is selectively dishonest - I absolutely agree that nobody has to provide any evidence of anything - right up until they are making claims that they want other people to believe. Even then nobody can demand anything but they can withhold their belief.

yeah, that was kinda the point of my post.

ExpertKipWatcher wrote:

LLCoolK wrote:

he doesnt have to prove anything to you. just shut the hell up and sign the petition

This is the bit that is selectively dishonest - I absolutely agree that nobody has to provide any evidence of anything - right up until they are making claims that they want other people to believe. Even then nobody can demand anything but they can withhold their belief.

You mean like claiming you are British and then failing to demonstratie it?

ExpertBritWatcher wrote:

You mean like claiming you are British and then failing to demonstratie it?

Originally I was taken in by this, now I couldn't give a toss.

ExpertKipWatcher wrote:

ExpertBritWatcher wrote:

You mean like claiming you are British and then failing to demonstratie it?

Originally I was taken in by this, now I couldn't give a toss.

He proved many pages ago that he has an intimate knowledge of an obscure part of British culture. If he's not a genuine Brit then he's an honorary Brit.

He proved many pages ago that he has an intimate knowledge of an obscure part of British culture. If he's not a genuine Brit then he's an honorary Brit.

What is proven by now is, that a lot of British ultrarunners are cheaters.

I do like the fact that they believe a petition will change GWR's mind. "Damn Amy you changed our mind with these 2500 people signing an internet petition. Who were we to doubt you in the first place despite the lack of evidence and following our own protocol?"

Karl Hungus wrote:

I do like the fact that they believe a petition will change GWR's mind. "Damn Amy you changed our mind with these 2500 people signing an internet petition. Who were we to doubt you in the first place despite the lack of evidence and following our own protocol?"

It's bizarre isn't it.

Might petition the IAAF to install me as 100m world record holder.

Might petition the IAAF to install me as 100m world record holder.

But if I petition your petition with more petitioners I will be the new 100m world record holder.

Why has nobody ever thought about it?

Why would you train like Usain Bold, if you can just start a petition?

Fran Smith wrote:

Might petition the IAAF to install me as 100m world record holder.

But if I petition your petition with more petitioners I will be the new 100m world record holder.

Why has nobody ever thought about it?

Why would you train like Usain Bold, if you can just start a petition?

This would be amazing: find a big fat guy and claim we all saw him drop a 9.42 for the 100m and when Guinness fails to recognize it we can get tons of signatures like Boaty McBoatface.

Karl Hungus wrote:

Fran Smith wrote:

But if I petition your petition with more petitioners I will be the new 100m world record holder.

Why has nobody ever thought about it?

Why would you train like Usain Bold, if you can just start a petition?

This would be amazing: find a big fat guy and claim we all saw him drop a 9.42 for the 100m and when Guinness fails to recognize it we can get tons of signatures like Boaty McBoatface.

Their rules only require 2 independent witnesses right?

Amy and Dave didn't think that through. Didn't they?

Karl Hungus wrote:

I do like the fact that they believe a petition will change GWR's mind. "Damn Amy you changed our mind with these 2500 people signing an internet petition. Who were we to doubt you in the first place despite the lack of evidence and following our own protocol?"

No. They don't care about GWR, what they care about is convincing everyone else that they did it and convincing people that they believe they did it. It's putting on a convincing show. But. They know they didn't, GWR knows, and anybody who has run a few times a week knows she didn't.

We live in an age of lies and the power of social media to create belief in those lies. Tell a story often enough and someone will believe it. Keep telling it and telling it. Especially if people want to believe it. Crazy times.

"We live in an age of lies and the power of social media to create belief in those lies. Tell a story often enough and someone will believe it. Keep telling it and telling it. Especially if people want to believe it. Crazy times."

Sounds like LRC. People keep repeating same shit over and over...even though we understood it the first time. Yep they likely lied about the total distance but we keep seeing the same crap posted over and over.

BTW, we already know that British charities are pretty much all a scam. So we don't need to continue down that path forever.

Yes, Brits keep coming to the US to continue exploit the colonies and continue their scams. It's been that way since the 17th century. No news there either.

Flounder wrote:

Sounds like LRC. People keep repeating same shit over and over...even though we understood it the first time. Yep they likely lied about the total distance but we keep seeing the same crap posted over and over.

These threads do go on far too long with lots of repetition, but it does seem to be somewhat fuelled by either trolls or the supporters of the cheaters. A bit of an effort to counterbalance repeated lies with repeated truth.

But, fraudsters and scammers are nothing new. The internet, and especially social media, have just allowed different platforms for fraud. But it's a double edged sword because it also allows more people to look into what they are doing. For the most part I actually don't care if these sorts of people convince others to give them money. If someone wants to give away their money and don't want to look into the matter before doing so, that's their problem. Although, I am sure there are some true "victims", people who really aren't able to figure these sorts of things out for themselves and wouldn't give if they knew the truth but I doubt they give enough money to be actually hurt by it.

BTW - the original blueprint for this sort of "donation" scam is religion. No ability to prove your assertions, demand people just have faith, and give give give.

1000!!!!!!!!

ExpertKipWatcher wrote:

ExpertBritWatcher wrote:

You mean like claiming you are British and then failing to demonstratie it?

Originally I was taken in by this, now I couldn't give a toss.

Good job throwing "toss" in there. lol

British imperialist wrote:

ExpertKipWatcher wrote:

Originally I was taken in by this, now I couldn't give a toss.

He proved many pages ago that he has an intimate knowledge of an obscure part of British culture. If he's not a genuine Brit then he's an honorary Brit.

Anyone can post under multiple handles to make it seem like others believe you.

It was proven many pages ago that you were, for whatever reason, posting as a Brit.

Flounder wrote:

Yes, Brits keep coming to the US to continue exploit the colonies and continue their scams. It's been that way since the 17th century. No news there either.

Quite a grasp of history you have there.