L L wrote:
I gotta stop conversing with you.
You used to troll with more nuance and intelligence.
And I would sometimes learn something.
But you've given up on those kind of responses and gone straight to tribal nonsense.
That's a shame because there doesn't seem to be any good responses from Trump supporters lately on this thread.
There are two types of Trump supporters.
Those who have been conned and those that think they are in on the con.
What you learn from me is only limited by your capacity to understand and believe what I tell you. If you have stopped learning, then you have closed your mind.
There is no nuance here. This is scorched earth political warfare. This is a political coup, and for the good of the country Trump must win.
What response could I possibly give that I haven't already put out there? This whole sham is a smoke screen to do two things:
1. Keep liberals agitated to fight Trump constantly and to undermine his agenda. Keep them believing Trump is guilty even without evidence. Stir up hatred for the enemy.
2. Keep Trump from unveiling the true depth of corruption that occurred under Obama and Hillary.
Number 2 is why the "Russian collusion" angle was chosen. Hillary was in so deep with the Russians with Uranium One and other pay-for-play donations, that she decided that the best defense was a good offense. They chose to accuse Trump of doing exactly what they were guilty of themselves. The MSM and the useful social media idiots ran with it, and so far it has worked.
The solution for Trump is to get off the defensive and go back on offense. Investigate Uranium One and all other Clinton Crime Family Foundation donations. Investigate the FBI, the FISA courts, etc. Go on the attack.
Like I said during the campaign, the only choice is to fight or lose.