Gay Agenda's next target: Frozen 2

So? How does this affect you?

No Flies On Me wrote:

So? How does this affect you?

It is not nearly liberal enough. The bigots need to show Sven and Kristoff going reindeer-style.

I can't imagine Disney would actually do this. They'll end up killing their cash cow....middle America evangelical/fundamentalists who'll likely boycott.

Disney's next movie MUST take up the transgender cause. I hear a re-make of "It's Pat" is in the works. The working subtitle is "Screw you North Carolina!"

Stagger Lee wrote:

I can't imagine Disney would actually do this. They'll end up killing their cash cow....middle America evangelical/fundamentalists who'll likely boycott.

Sadly, this may be the only reason it doesn't happen.

So their agenda is just to see more of themselves in the movies?

Whew!

I thought there agenda was conversion.

You people with the Gay Agenda thing. No straight dude ever decided to suck another man's dongle because someone handed him a pamphlet at a parade. Anyone who thinks that has their own sexuality issues.

The traffic you sit in, the lines you wait in would all be longer if there were no gay people.

So, ever enjoy a light traffic day or a day when the lines aren't that long? Thank the gays!

Flagpole wrote:

Thank the gays!

That seems like a fun alternative to "thank god"

person a: I found the wedding ring you thought you lost.

person b: oh, thank the gays!

Some words of wisdom.

LET IT GO, LET IT GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Flagpole wrote:

You people with the Gay Agenda thing. No straight dude ever decided to suck another man's dongle because someone handed him a pamphlet at a parade. Anyone who thinks that has their own sexuality issues.

The traffic you sit in, the lines you wait in would all be longer if there were no gay people.

So, ever enjoy a light traffic day or a day when the lines aren't that long? Thank the gays!

You honestly want to argue that glamorizing a behavior has no effect on people viewing it, especially young children?

I have no idea what you mean by the last two lines of your post.

I personally couldn't care less what Disney does with their characters. I avoid these overblown animated messes with sh*tty plots and poor character development like the plague. How the first Frozen movie was a blockbuster is beyond me.

The only thing I'm confused about is how Elsa's sexual orientation furthers the plot. Do four year old girls really care?

For the umpteenth time, the issue (as you are very well aware) is not sexual issue "confusion" but how that concept is overworked (as well as over exaggerated) and used as an excuse by the media and public schools to prey upon children and indoctrinate them into accepting a set of preferences and choices in order to achieve an overarching agenda.

Flagpole wrote:

You people with the Gay Agenda thing. No straight dude ever decided to suck another man's dongle because someone handed him a pamphlet at a parade. Anyone who thinks that has their own sexuality issues.

The traffic you sit in, the lines you wait in would all be longer if there were no gay people.

So, ever enjoy a light traffic day or a day when the lines aren't that long? Thank the gays!

Oh, you're thinking of what churches do.

Emmanuel Goldstein wrote:

For the umpteenth time, the issue (as you are very well aware) is not sexual issue "confusion" but how that concept is overworked (as well as over exaggerated) and used as an excuse by the media and public schools to prey upon children and indoctrinate them into accepting a set of preferences and choices in order to achieve an overarching agenda.

I think Hollywood has done a lot of glamorizing the mafia.

They surely glamorize guns.

Should we be concerned about the agenda of violence the same?

I've watched the Godfather and the Birdcage.

I haven't gotten into crime or tried to get close to another dude.

Emmanuel Goldstein wrote:

For the umpteenth time, the issue (as you are very well aware) is not sexual issue "confusion" but how that concept is overworked (as well as over exaggerated) and used as an excuse by the media and public schools to prey upon children and indoctrinate them into accepting a set of preferences and choices in order to achieve an overarching agenda.

Flagpole wrote:

You people with the Gay Agenda thing. No straight dude ever decided to suck another man's dongle because someone handed him a pamphlet at a parade. Anyone who thinks that has their own sexuality issues.

The traffic you sit in, the lines you wait in would all be longer if there were no gay people.

So, ever enjoy a light traffic day or a day when the lines aren't that long? Thank the gays!

^^^ This. At its core, many heterosexuals will always view homosexuality as a deviant condition, regardless of how accepted it is in our society. The issue is that these heterosexuals also want their children to grow up viewing it as a deviant condition and not the norm. The "homosexual agenda," as so often perceived, seems to be geared towards eliminating the possibility of persecution by making homosexuality more mainstream. Hence, you have two groups of people at odds.

I think if people were more honest with themselves (on both sides), they could better articulate the root of their prejudices towards others. The problem is, many people avoid doing so for fear that they will realize that their justifications sound stupid.

L L wrote:

I think Hollywood has done a lot of glamorizing the mafia.

They surely glamorize guns.

Should we be concerned about the agenda of violence the same?

I've watched the Godfather and the Birdcage.

I haven't gotten into crime or tried to get close to another dude.

A sane post won't convince the insane....

With the fast rise in world population, I think that more same sex marriages can only help the planet.

Cool username dude! You're totally living in an Orwellian society. Watch out for the Thought Police!By the way, being gay isn't a choice--why would anyone choose to be discriminated against? If you made a choice to be straight, sounds like you're repressing something.Also, over exaggerating is repeating yourself. Exaggerating is the word that you want.

Emmanuel Goldstein wrote:

For the umpteenth time, the issue (as you are very well aware) is not sexual issue "confusion" but how that concept is overworked (as well as over exaggerated) and used as an excuse by the media and public schools to prey upon children and indoctrinate them into accepting a set of preferences and choices in order to achieve an overarching agenda.

Flagpole wrote:

You people with the Gay Agenda thing. No straight dude ever decided to suck another man's dongle because someone handed him a pamphlet at a parade. Anyone who thinks that has their own sexuality issues.

The traffic you sit in, the lines you wait in would all be longer if there were no gay people.

So, ever enjoy a light traffic day or a day when the lines aren't that long? Thank the gays!

Should we be concerned? Hell yes. That is why we have a rating system.

L L wrote:

I think Hollywood has done a lot of glamorizing the mafia.

They surely glamorize guns.

Should we be concerned about the agenda of violence the same?

I've watched the Godfather and the Birdcage.

I haven't gotten into crime or tried to get close to another dude.

You watched Godfather, rated R as an adult. Show it to 1000 young children a few times and watch them grow up.

Frozen 2 will probably not be rated R.