BEN JOHNSON won the olympics

they should airbrush the drug cheats from the video of that race. So it's Calvin in front of Robson with astonishingly only 2 making the final.

ben johnson fan wrote:

I watched it. He won. Anytime they show a video hes the one winning it. Every website that mentions the winner always has an * that mentions he won. he was the fastest man.

You can't tell me what I have to think.

Ben Johnson is the Olympic champ in Seoul

So do you jiggle or cup his nut sack when you suck him off?

Libtards want to know!

he won

he won wrote:

he won

And you won too! You won Ben's "Johnson."

that race was incredible. Did you see him? How can anyone watch that and not be wow'd. 9.79 in 1988. F-ckn brilliant. Awesome display

Maybe I posted this before but - Ben Johnson was the best of the bunch that sunny day over in Seoul, Korea!

T-Rex wrote:

Maybe I posted this before but - Ben Johnson was the best of the bunch that sunny day over in Seoul, Korea!

I did have the best "juice" that is for sure.

Now I'm just an old, fat, & bitter drug cheat who could not win a jr high 100m dash after I stopped my "cycles."

i enjoy it

ben johnson fan wrote:

i enjoy it

You used to much teeth last go around.

But you did take it like a champ when the "release" splattered your face.

Ben had 9.72 potential. Remember how faster was the Tokio track in 1991 WC's, compared with Seoul track 3 years before. And in that final he didn't even try in the last 5-10 meters.

Ben L Wrong wrote:

Ben had 9.72 potential. Remember how faster was the Tokio track in 1991 WC's, compared with Seoul track 3 years before. And in that final he didn't even try in the last 5-10 meters.

He was just a few "juice" cycles away.

Ben beating Carl in 1988 was big. It was huge in Canada. People down south don't understand how much we wanted Ben to beat Carl.

This was bigger than winner a hockey gold medal, IMO.

And it all crashed down in the days following. Devastating. Absolutely crushed the spirits of Canadians like no other sporting event ever.

I still think the field was "level" so to speak. In the same way the field in the 2005 Tour de France was "level". Not that I condone what he did.

I remember when he failed the drug test and I was not shocked at all. He oozed anabolic steroids. Especially when you saw what used to be built like when first started international sprinting. There may never be a better responder to PED's better than Johnson.

Does anyone remember at the time he got busted everyone was saying that nobody would ever run that fast without PED's? And yet here we are. 2015 and a clean 33 year old ran 9.74.

I WAS shocked. Completely shocked. Guess there was more trust in the sport back then.

However, looking back, we should only be shocked that he tested positive. Why? Lance never failed a test, right?

And Ben had been doing this for years supposedly. So why a positive test for Ben out of the blue?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/9612997/Forgotten-heroes-who-rose-above-the-scandal-of-drugs.html

I think the trainers back then were shocked he tested positive.

Yes, he was using, but he should have tested negative just like Lance and all the other cheats.

It all makes me believe what Moore says in his book (see above) that Ben probably was set up.

What's the real story behind the positive in Seoul? That's the compelling story, right?

Ben did wrong, but he fessed up. He can be forgiven now.

canuck runner from wrote:

I still think the field was "level" so to speak. In the same way the field in the 2005 Tour de France was "level". Not that I condone what he did.

Not only is there no credible evidence that Carl Lewis used anabolic steroids, there is also no credible evidence that he lifted weights until shortly before 1996. It's interesting to speculate what Carl could have done had he lifted weights starting much earlier (and, needless to say, had he not Gone Vegan after 1991)...

seoul analysis wrote:

I WAS shocked. Completely shocked. Guess there was more trust in the sport back then.

However, looking back, we should only be shocked that he tested positive. Why? Lance never failed a test, right?

And Ben had been doing this for years supposedly. So why a positive test for Ben out of the blue?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/9612997/Forgotten-heroes-who-rose-above-the-scandal-of-drugs.html

I think the trainers back then were shocked he tested positive.

Yes, he was using, but he should have tested negative just like Lance and all the other cheats.

It all makes me believe what Moore says in his book (see above) that Ben probably was set up.

What's the real story behind the positive in Seoul? That's the compelling story, right?

Ben did wrong, but he fessed up. He can be forgiven now.

He can be forgiven, but he did not "win" the '88 100M OLY's. Carl Lewis won that race.

its really easy for you to go into fantasy world isn't it? do you watch the race and pretend carl won? because thats what you have to do to say it