Hands up don't shoot was a Big Lie

Again, liberal do.not.care about the truth. Instead: if the story fits my agenda - be loud.

This finding is equally as important from the article: "This report highlighted systemic exploitation and racial profiling of black residents in Ferguson."

White liberals are the most destructive force in any country. They are the ones that have been killing the USA for the last 50 years. Now, they make laws and bans all over the USA. Like old Robes did in the French Revolution in the 1790's. If white Liberals aren't stopped..it is all a matter of time.

Does anyone understand that it's not "profiling" when the overwhelming majority of the crimes committed in Ferguson are proportionately committed by blacks? Same thing in prisons. There are more blacks proportionately in the system because they commit more crimes. This is getting silly.

Prison Physician wrote:

Does anyone understand that it's not "profiling" when the overwhelming majority of the crimes committed in Ferguson are proportionately committed by blacks? Same thing in prisons. There are more blacks proportionately in the system because they commit more crimes. This is getting silly.

I agree and thank you for pointing this out. However, there was convincing evidence provided by the DOJ to suggest it was taken to an extreme.

The problem with the DOJ report is they gave some really stupid numbers. Like 100% of police dog bites were on blacks. Meaning..... the dogs are racist too?

Fck racist libtards wrote:

Fair and balanced wrote:

This finding is equally as important from the article: "This report highlighted systemic exploitation and racial profiling of black residents in Ferguson."

STFU you racist c0ck sucker!

I really appreciate this tldr synopsis of conservative race theory.

jewbacca wrote:

Prison Physician wrote:

Does anyone understand that it's not "profiling" when the overwhelming majority of the crimes committed in Ferguson are proportionately committed by blacks? Same thing in prisons. There are more blacks proportionately in the system because they commit more crimes. This is getting silly.

I agree and thank you for pointing this out. However, there was convincing evidence provided by the DOJ to suggest it was taken to an extreme.

The problem with the DOJ report is they gave some really stupid numbers. Like 100% of police dog bites were on blacks. Meaning..... the dogs are racist too?

I kept hearing that too but I think you also need to back up the picture and ask about the "application" of police canine; how often are dogs involve with a black perp as a white perp..?

When I hear that I think to myself: these people at the DOJ have a sense of humor because it is otherwise ridiculous to come to such a conclusion (unless they are one-dem liberals who have completely perverted yet another of our definitions).

Prison Physician wrote:

Does anyone understand that it's not "profiling" when the overwhelming majority of the crimes committed in Ferguson are proportionately committed by blacks? Same thing in prisons. There are more blacks proportionately in the system because they commit more crimes. This is getting silly.

Do you understand the term profiling? Their is a difference between blacks committing a crime, say six times as frequently as whites and blacks GETTING CONVICTED six times as frequently for a crime. Please tell me you understand that difference without needing to resort to hand puppets.

Here is a real world example: It has been proven by numerous studies that blacks and whites use illegal narcotics at about the same rate yet you are four times as likely to get convicted of an illegal narcotics offense if you are black. My 10 year old niece would understand that but apparently it escapes most conservatives. You are either stupid or just playing stupid.

krispy kremlin wrote:

jewbacca wrote:

I agree and thank you for pointing this out. However, there was convincing evidence provided by the DOJ to suggest it was taken to an extreme.

The problem with the DOJ report is they gave some really stupid numbers. Like 100% of police dog bites were on blacks. Meaning..... the dogs are racist too?

I kept hearing that too but I think you also need to back up the picture and ask about the "application" of police canine; how often are dogs involve with a black perp as a white perp..?

When I hear that I think to myself: these people at the DOJ have a sense of humor because it is otherwise ridiculous to come to such a conclusion (unless they are one-dem liberals who have completely perverted yet another of our definitions).

That's the thing, they only reported dog bite frequency, not dog deployment.

Which highlights my beef with how the DOJ report is reported. No context is given. For example, something like 90% of car searches were done to blacks. But cops have to have reasonable suspicion to search a vehicle, so the flip side of the stat is that blacks are more likely to give reasonable suspicion? Reporting percentages is a start, but it really isn't the whole picture.

The police department profiling accusations have nothing to do with convictions in narcotics because the police are not on the juries or on the bench.

Something else to consider is that all of the towns surrounding Ferguson have a much later percentage of blacks (all over 75%, some well over 90%) than Ferguson's 67%.

Most every news report I've read focuses on that 67% with no mention of the area at large. With how tightly packed these towns are, and with how much intertown traffic there is, wouldn't it stand to reason that the percentage of blacks pulled over would match the demographics of the area, not just the town of Ferguson? So with a higher percentage of blacks in the surrounding area, of course the percentage of blacks pulled over would be higher.

Get used to it.. wrote:

The police department profiling accusations have nothing to do with convictions in narcotics because the police are not on the juries or on the bench.

Yeah I'm sure my zero drug offense convictions have nothing to do with the fact the police never searched my car even though I carried regularly during my college years. Again, are you that stupid or playing stupid.

There are lots of backs who have carried in their vehicles too and have never been pulled over. How stupid are you?

which is it? wrote:

Get used to it.. wrote:

The police department profiling accusations have nothing to do with convictions in narcotics because the police are not on the juries or on the bench.

Yeah I'm sure my zero drug offense convictions have nothing to do with the fact the police never searched my car even though I carried regularly during my college years. Again, are you that stupid or playing stupid.

which is it wrote:

Do you understand the term profiling? Their is a difference between blacks committing a crime, say six times as frequently as whites and blacks GETTING CONVICTED six times as frequently for a crime. Please tell me you understand that difference without needing to resort to hand puppets.

A one-to-one correspondence seems pretty reasonable to me. Could you do the hand puppet thing, so that I can understand what you find inappropriate about this scenario? Thanks.

Fck racist libtards wrote:

Fair and balanced wrote:

This finding is equally as important from the article: "This report highlighted systemic exploitation and racial profiling of black residents in Ferguson."

STFU you racist c0ck sucker!

Racist Liberal cities across America racially profile blacks and other minority groups yet you racist c0ck suckers focus on "hands up don't shoot" racist lies.

You racist Tards would sent that Police Officer to his death given the chance.

You libs are all evil scumbags.

Hey man,

You are clearly having some mental problems. I hope you have someone you can talk to or some mere you can take. Don't worry, it gets better. Just take care of your mental health. I hope you get better. Good luck.