Ok so initially the officials missed the DQ. Britain protested, the US was DQ'd. The US appealed, citing inconclusive video evidence, but was denied. My question is if the evidence was inconclusive, what evidence was looked at to DQ the US team? It had to be video. I'm assuming the US went over different camera angles. Additionally, everything I've found online has been inconclusive, both ways. I just saw this as well on Track and Field News website.
So what gives?