You didn't respond to my question about her comments in the MK interview, regarding the complaint she filed in 1993. This is what she said early in the interview:
TR: I filled it out with my information and then I described the sexual harassment in terms of that being asked to be served the drinks and being uncomfortable. I doubt I use the word sexual harassment. I did not talk about the sexual assault at all. I only talked about the retaliation as well, because at that point, I was really afraid of losing my position.
Here is what she says later on:
MK: Now he says, he’s calling on the National Archives to release whatever documents that may have come from the Senate personnel offices while you were there, in search of this alleged complaint. They say they don’t have them. Some are saying he should release his Senate files that are being kept at the University of Delaware. He says he’s not going to do that. He was asked ‘Why not just have somebody go over there and do a search only for any document that mentions Tara Reade or sexual harassment?’ He won’t do it. Your reaction to that?
TR: I think that says it all. And I think once we get the document, we’ll see what it says.
How does not agreeing to letting his records be searched "say it all"? She already told us what it says and it's about people being mean to her because she refused to serve drinks. Why is she pushing for in irrelevant complaint to be located?