Court Documents Support Tara Reade's Allegations against Biden

Armstronglivs wrote:

His claim is still hearsay. That means it wouldn't be admitted as evidence in a case alleging a sexual offence. There is no case against Biden because there is no evidence that a court would accept; it is only Reade's claim, which Biden denies. Nor is there a Congressional record of a formal complaint made against Biden 27 years ago.

Reade says her motivation is to get Biden to withdraw his candidacy. If - in her opinion - the unproven sexual conduct of the candidate disqualifies him what has she to say about Trump and the numerous allegations against him? Nothing. Her motivation in making the accusation is by her own admission therefore political - but only in respect of the Democrat candidate.

So on the basis of something that allegedly occurred 27 years ago, for which there is no actual evidence, Reade wishes to determine the outcome of the most important US election in over half a century. As a fulsome Putin supporter, it's easy to see why she would want to do that.

Armstronglivs wrote:

His claim is still hearsay. That means it wouldn't be admitted as evidence in a case alleging a sexual offence. There is no case against Biden because there is no evidence that a court would accept; it is only Reade's claim, which Biden denies. Nor is there a Congressional record of a formal complaint made against Biden 27 years ago.

Reade says her motivation is to get Biden to withdraw his candidacy. If - in her opinion - the unproven sexual conduct of the candidate disqualifies him what has she to say about Trump and the numerous allegations against him? Nothing. Her motivation in making the accusation is by her own admission therefore political - but only in respect of the Democrat candidate.

So on the basis of something that allegedly occurred 27 years ago, for which there is no actual evidence, Reade wishes to determine the outcome of the most important US election in over half a century. As a fulsome Putin supporter, it's easy to see why she would want to do that.

Armstronglivs wrote:

His claim is still hearsay. That means it wouldn't be admitted as evidence in a case alleging a sexual offence. There is no case against Biden because there is no evidence that a court would accept; it is only Reade's claim, which Biden denies. Nor is there a Congressional record of a formal complaint made against Biden 27 years ago.

Reade says her motivation is to get Biden to withdraw his candidacy. If - in her opinion - the unproven sexual conduct of the candidate disqualifies him what has she to say about Trump and the numerous allegations against him? Nothing. Her motivation in making the accusation is by her own admission therefore political - but only in respect of the Democrat candidate.

So on the basis of something that allegedly occurred 27 years ago, for which there is no actual evidence, Reade wishes to determine the outcome of the most important US election in over half a century. As a fulsome Putin supporter, it's easy to see why she would want to do that.

BoBtheBarber wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

His claim is still hearsay. That means it wouldn't be admitted as evidence in a case alleging a sexual offence. There is no case against Biden because there is no evidence that a court would accept; it is only Reade's claim, which Biden denies. Nor is there a Congressional record of a formal complaint made against Biden 27 years ago.

Reade says her motivation is to get Biden to withdraw his candidacy. If - in her opinion - the unproven sexual conduct of the candidate disqualifies him what has she to say about Trump and the numerous allegations against him? Nothing. Her motivation in making the accusation is by her own admission therefore political - but only in respect of the Democrat candidate.

So on the basis of something that allegedly occurred 27 years ago, for which there is no actual evidence, Reade wishes to determine the outcome of the most important US election in over half a century. As a fulsome Putin supporter, it's easy to see why she would want to do that.

Stupid much? She doesn't go after Trump because she was not sexually harassed by Trump. She would look like a lunatic if she went after Trump or anyone she is not accusing of an assault against her. I am not saying she is truthful or there is a smoking gun but your logic is trash.

The Cost of Modern Medicine! wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

His claim is still hearsay. That means it wouldn't be admitted as evidence in a case alleging a sexual offence. There is no case against Biden because there is no evidence that a court would accept; it is only Reade's claim, which Biden denies. Nor is there a Congressional record of a formal complaint made against Biden 27 years ago.

Reade says her motivation is to get Biden to withdraw his candidacy. If - in her opinion - the unproven sexual conduct of the candidate disqualifies him what has she to say about Trump and the numerous allegations against him? Nothing. Her motivation in making the accusation is by her own admission therefore political - but only in respect of the Democrat candidate.

So on the basis of something that allegedly occurred 27 years ago, for which there is no actual evidence, Reade wishes to determine the outcome of the most important US election in over half a century. As a fulsome Putin supporter, it's easy to see why she would want to do that.

You lost me with the Putin comment?!?!

Armstronglivs wrote:

His claim is still hearsay. That means it wouldn't be admitted as evidence in a case alleging a sexual offence. There is no case against Biden because there is no evidence that a court would accept; it is only Reade's claim, which Biden denies. Nor is there a Congressional record of a formal complaint made against Biden 27 years ago.

Reade says her motivation is to get Biden to withdraw his candidacy. If - in her opinion - the unproven sexual conduct of the candidate disqualifies him what has she to say about Trump and the numerous allegations against him? Nothing. Her motivation in making the accusation is by her own admission therefore political - but only in respect of the Democrat candidate.

So on the basis of something that allegedly occurred 27 years ago, for which there is no actual evidence, Reade wishes to determine the outcome of the most important US election in over half a century. As a fulsome Putin supporter, it's easy to see why she would want to do that.

fact checker 642572498 wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

His claim is still hearsay. That means it wouldn't be admitted as evidence in a case alleging a sexual offence. There is no case against Biden because there is no evidence that a court would accept; it is only Reade's claim, which Biden denies. Nor is there a Congressional record of a formal complaint made against Biden 27 years ago.

Reade says her motivation is to get Biden to withdraw his candidacy. If - in her opinion - the unproven sexual conduct of the candidate disqualifies him what has she to say about Trump and the numerous allegations against him? Nothing. Her motivation in making the accusation is by her own admission therefore political - but only in respect of the Democrat candidate.

So on the basis of something that allegedly occurred 27 years ago, for which there is no actual evidence, Reade wishes to determine the outcome of the most important US election in over half a century. As a fulsome Putin supporter, it's easy to see why she would want to do that.

The Biden campaign said there were never any complaints about sexual harassment or abuse. EVER. That has been demonstrably proved wrong as court documents show the chief of staff cut a deal with Reade for her to leave her position. That is CORROBORATED by numerous people working in the office who said Reade suddenly and abruptly was reassigned to a different position.

There likely is a congressional record, held by the Univ. of Delaware (Biden's home state). They won't release it. There are also reports of Biden staffers being granted access to it, meaning they had an opportunity to remove the documentation of the claim.

Reade is actually a BERNIE supporter, she does not want Trump as president. She wants Biden to be replaced by another democrat since the primary is not over yet. This is not an unpopular opinion, even before the allegations came out, as Biden is clearly in mental decline and many have tried to get Cuomo, Michele Obama, and even Clinton to replace Biden.

Precious Roy wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

His claim is still hearsay. That means it wouldn't be admitted as evidence in a case alleging a sexual offence. There is no case against Biden because there is no evidence that a court would accept; it is only Reade's claim, which Biden denies. Nor is there a Congressional record of a formal complaint made against Biden 27 years ago.

Reade says her motivation is to get Biden to withdraw his candidacy. If - in her opinion - the unproven sexual conduct of the candidate disqualifies him what has she to say about Trump and the numerous allegations against him? Nothing. Her motivation in making the accusation is by her own admission therefore political - but only in respect of the Democrat candidate.

So on the basis of something that allegedly occurred 27 years ago, for which there is no actual evidence, Reade wishes to determine the outcome of the most important US election in over half a century. As a fulsome Putin supporter, it's easy to see why she would want to do that.

It would be admissible to show that Reade made a contemporaneous report of the incident and to show her emotional response to the sexual assault. And the defense would open the door for the evidence to come in if they raised the issue about there being no record of her making a complaint.

I am sure that Biden did this. In the early 90s, men could get away with stuff like that. Senators' offices were filled with young pretty girls for a reason back then.

Biden is a liar. He had to drop out of the presidential race because he lied about his academics. His best debate against Bernie was the one where he lied continuously. Biden needs to drop out. He is sundowning and is now incredibly vulnerable on corruption with his son's dealings in Ukraine and on sexual assault. The DNC went after Bernie hard on electability grounds and cannot ignore the fact that Biden is an incredibly weak candidate. I don't care whether it is Bernie, Warren, Pete, Amy or whoever the smoke filled room chooses. If #metoo means anything, Biden has to go.

Stoppit Smith wrote:

Unlike the Kavanaugh/Blasey Ford issue, it seems that too much adds up to the fact that something happened. The problem is that Biden and his team have both rhetoric and the media to help him. He also is getting fuel from colleagues in the House and Senate.

What do I mean?

Over the course of time, the idea of unwanted touching morphed from the definition of sexual harassment to the more modern sexual assault. Ms. Reade is not incorrect to use the term sexual assault if Biden did anything close to what is being represented.

Unfortunately, Biden is also not incorrect, technically, if and only if he is using the old definitions, in which case, at that time, would not yet have been considered sexual assault since that term was usually used for rape at that time.

While this court document is not binding as evidence, it would allow the media to confront Biden about what actually happened and, furthermore, if he ever even touched Ms. Reade. If he did, then it would allow reporters to ask what that contact looked like.

But they won't do that because it would make the Democratic party side look incomplete and as their goal is a victory over Trump, it would not help.

Couple that with prominent female lawmakers like Ms. Pelosi and Ms. Feinstein supporting Biden, and you have a muddled story because nobody is willing to take Biden to task on the specifics, which actually do exist in this situation.

Nobody is willing to pursue the full story, which is very wrong considering what is being presented.