another perspective wrote:
zxcvzxcv wrote:
More reason to spend government dollars directly on public pre-k and child care facilities, rather than funnelling it into private interests with subpar facilities and limited oversight, as in this case.
Completely wrong answer. Funneling money through government is never the best way to do something, whether it is directly like you want or through private companies using subsidies. Govt being involved in much of anything other than public safety and public infrastructure projects is the wrong way to go, its just a magnet for corruption. We'd all be shocked how easy it'd be to balance local, state, and federal budgets with current tax receipts if we could magically get rid of all the fraud.
This is all correct, but there's one issue: many industries would run out of control without government involvement (even with the corruption). Specifically, healthcare, childcare, and banking. The first two would raise prices to the moon and the third would take on risky investments and lose everyone's money for at least the fourth time (1907, 1929, 2007). You're right in that the government being involved is never efficient, but the government not being involved may be less efficient.
The best solution is unknown.