you are behind the times wrote:
I haven't done a survey but I would be quite surprised if there were more than a handful of chapters using "association for retarded citizens" as their name at this point. Can you link to your local chapter?
Yes, I can, but I'd rather not.
I haven't been involved with the organization in a long time, so I don't know what discussions there have been in recent years regarding the use of the word "retarded" in the name. But I would guess that the considerations are similar to what they were decades ago: "Association for Retarded Citizens" may sound "behind the times" to many people -- including me -- but it is a well-recognized name for a number of highly-regarded organizations that have done a tremendous amount of good for thousands of people over many years. In contrast, although I don't doubt that many people now know what "The Arc" is, it's still a non-descriptive name that has no real meaning apart from its origin as an acronym for "Association for Retarded Citizens." It's O.K. for people to have different opinions about whether chapters should continue to use the "r word" in their names, but these decisions have been made thoughtfully by good and knowledgeable people who actually care a great deal about the interests and sensitivities of the disadvantaged population that they serve.
Many other organizations deal with these kinds of issues. For example, throughout their history, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and the United Negro College Fund (UNCF) have been confronted by allegations that their names include terminology that is outdated or offensive. But they have carefully considered those allegations. It would be absurd to accuse these distinguished organizations of ignorance or insensitivity toward the millions of people whom they have served so ably for so long.
(I don't mean to suggest, by the way, that your particular comments have been unreasonable or inappropriate. A physician who currently uses the word "retarded" as a medical term to describe persons with such disabilities should, at the very least, be aware of how that usage may be perceived.)