Who said we were talking about "a little testosterone on Galen"? The test was, by Salazar's own admission, to determine how much would result in a positive test. In other words, the test determined how much could be used and be gotten away with.
Freudian slip? Have you set aside your impartiality?
Let's assume this arguendo. How did someone so paranoid allow "testosterone medication" to shop up on Galen's records? Wouldn't an atypically paranoid person be just the type to "execut[e] elaborate plots and schemes years in the making all boiling down to being able to dope his athletes"?
Interesting use of the qualifier "active." Why would that be? As for the no evidence of supplements, isn't that whole explanation for the "testosterone medication" on Galen's records?
You do realize that the use of thyroid and asthma medication when not medically necessary is a doping violation, right?
This is exactly what you say when you are not evaluating the activities and eligibility of the athletes.
You realize he conspired with a now banned doctor to alter medical records, a crime, to cover-up bad behavior, right? That's not a conspiracy theory, that's a conspiracy. Also, look at the efforts that folks like Armstrong went through and tell me that elaborate plots aren't possible.
I also don't think you know how Occam's Razor works. On one side you have a clean Salazar taking actions that would be consistent with doping operations (altering medical records, trying to explain away "testosterone medicine" in an athlete's file, clandestinely sending perfectly OK medication in a hollowed out book), and mutliple accusations from former athletes and coaches, but all this is actually just fine. On the other side, you have an actually dirty Salazar, acting like a doper (altering medical records, including "testosterone medicine" in an athlete's file, clandestinely sending medication in a hollowed out book), accusations from other of illegal behavior, and a previous history of athletes under his supervision using testosterone. Which of these two possibilities requires the smaller number of assumptions?