For those saying "definitely not short," I'd like to know the criteria by which this was determined. Does "definitely not short" mean:
1. I have my PR there, and I don't want to even think about my PR being suspect, so I'll try to stonewall any questions?
2. I don't think it's short?
3. I heard someone else say it's not short?
or
3. I've gone out and measured it by some recognized means?
GPS watches are better than they once were for measuring, and, if anything, a GPS watch should measure a course as a little long (maybe as much as 1 or 2% long if it's a course without a lot of turns, like the Liberty Bell course is). If you run the Liberty Bell course and get 3.07 miles on a GPS watch, that's actually pretty good evidence the course is short. I've never run the exact course, much less with a GPS watch on, so I have no basis to say whether it's short or not.
I am curious, though.
It is true that Saturday morning's conditions were pretty good, but probably a bit short of spectacular, for racing. No doubt about it, Sprout owns the course record, but it's very difficult to say how his effort compares with the 14:51 mentioned for Williams, other than it was 13 seconds faster on the clock. Wolfe probably doesn't run a 14:47 on his own, but he is undoubtedly a very good runner and this provides nice evidence of that.
For those suggesting a problem with marking the course this time around, there really isn't much in the way of variability to be had in the marking. City streets and curbs don't move. The canal trail doesn't move. This course layout boasts far more repeatability than traditional cross country courses. There are no corners to be marked in a grassy field somewhere. I'd be stunned to learn there was a significant marking issue.