Coachy Coach wrote:
I think for college coaches the sport does the work for them. It's pretty obvious who is a good sprinter, distance runner, or shot putter just by looking at their marks. Taking that to the next level and it SHOULD BE fairly obvious how they are going to do. But say football for example they are playing against boys that suck and then they have play against men that are good. With the top few in football it's obvious they are going to do well but with the rest it's not. How many sacks you get in high school doesn't really equate to what you will do in college. How fast you run the 100 in high school tells you what they can already run in college.
Everything Coachy Coach has said up to this point is correct.
College track & field and cross country is not football, basketball, baseball, or hockey.
There is very little money involved.
Coaches have thousands of kids to recruit from (Do you realize that over 4000 high school boys in America each year run under 2 minutes for the 800? This is well documented by websites, except for the fact many marks are not
reported by the high school coach. Similar marks are achieved by athletes of both genders in every event.)
As a college coach how many kids do you want to deal with? Do you really want your kid to be the one who is known to have the pushy parents?
Coachy Coach, myself, and others did not say parents should not be involved at all. Of course you care about your kid and help them in as many ways as possible. That is why you Do Not talk to the coach or email him unless he asks you to, and in some cases he will.
Many parents think their kid is so great college coaches should come running. But you have to understand there are so many great kids that get overlooked every year. Be smart. Do the leg work and have your kid do some as well.
You will not learn all there is to learn about recruiting on LRC, any more than you will learn all there is to learn about
electricity. It's complicated and hard work for college coaches.