WTF SERIOUSLY: Lornah Salpeter just ran 2:19:46 Prague ein

Dan Salpeter wrote:

If you are so curious, I've learned a lot from coach Scott Simmons, Coach Renato Canova and more experts at the field of Strength training and Nutrition.

I would be happy to share with you all of my insights that is leading Lonah's progress

I would think one part of the puzzle if getting the proper mind-set. Jordan Hasay is a runner who was battling mental issues she overcame that finally got her past being really frustrated when she lost, which was not helping her.

reed wrote:

nobody capitalizes Coach, Strength, and Nutrition.

2/10 troll

Ahem....

Nobody

Reed

Learn to capitalize, troll.

Man, guys are terrible at judging weight fluctuations. That's 5lbs max, plus a load of training.

I always say there are three major things that contribute to athletic success: talent, training, and the right combination of PEDS. Obviously, the part that I’m involved in provides the greatest benefit.

Pharmacist wrote:

I always say there are three major things that contribute to athletic success: talent, training, and the right combination of PEDS. Obviously, the part that I’m involved in provides the greatest benefit.

-1/10

Mentality >>>>>>>> Physicality >>>>>>> PEDS

Without the PEDs will not make up for low physicality.

Great physicality will not overcome terribly mentality.

Running on PURE Hate wrote:

Pharmacist wrote:

I always say there are three major things that contribute to athletic success: talent, training, and the right combination of PEDS. Obviously, the part that I’m involved in provides the greatest benefit.

-1/10

Mentality >>>>>>>> Physicality >>>>>>> PEDS

PEDs will not make up for low physicality.

Great physicality will not overcome terribly mentality.

Tweaked post.

Pharmacist wrote:

I always say there are three major things that contribute to athletic success: talent, training, and the right combination of PEDS. Obviously, the part that I’m involved in provides the greatest benefit.

Cynicism with a sense of humour. It always amuses me that huge gains are typically put down to coaching, nutrition, a new training programme and a great work ethic - as though a million other athletes don't have any of that.

Running on PURE Hate wrote:

Running on PURE Hate wrote:

-1/10

Mentality >>>>>>>> Physicality >>>>>>> PEDS

PEDs will not make up for low physicality.

Great physicality will not overcome terribly mentality.

Tweaked post.

You have clearly never tried EPO, my friend.

Coevett wrote:

BTW, you're clearly somebody very close to her, maybe a coach or agent. I doubt very much some random Israeli running fan is going to come in here and launch a tirade like that in her defence. If I was an Israeli athletics fan, I'd be very concerned that somebody who appears to be the next doping bust in waiting is representing my country's flag.

You direct a question about her improvement to her coach/husband that has responded in this thread. That might get to the truth of the improvement rather than making baseless accusations.

Pharmacist wrote:

Running on PURE Hate wrote:

Tweaked post.

You have clearly never tried EPO, my friend.

And you are up to your eyeballs is usage. So, is your mile PR sub 3:45? It should be based on your massive PED use.

You are sick!

Sorry for the auto-correct capitalization.

You are pleased to contact me in my private FB (Dan Salpeter) or email (

dansalpeter@gmail.com

).

The problem is, most of you are so sick and obsessed about doping nowadays that it's just impossible to have a technical discussion.

0/10

Dan Salpeter wrote:

Sorry for the auto-correct capitalization.

You are pleased to contact me in my private FB (Dan Salpeter) or email (

dansalpeter@gmail.com

).

The problem is, most of you are so sick and obsessed about doping nowadays that it's just impossible to have a technical discussion.

0/10

Most of the PED complainers are actual PED users who have failed to become the champions they so desperately want to be despite their personal drug usage. They are failures who take their failings out on others.

Sick

And funny.

Dan Salpeter wrote:

The problem is, most of you are so sick and obsessed about doping nowadays that it's just impossible to have a technical discussion.

0/10

I can understand you being upset about doubts being raised as to your wife's performance and progression, which no doubt is incredible if clean, and an incredible achievement on your part as her coach, but.... is it really 'sick' to be sceptical about it in the light of the recent bust of the half-marathon WR holder who showed a similarly remarkable improvement. Again, I understand your frustration if you know her to be a clean athlete, but surely it's the sad state of doping in athletics that warrants that scepticism?

Armstronglivs wrote:

Pharmacist wrote:

I always say there are three major things that contribute to athletic success: talent, training, and the right combination of PEDS. Obviously, the part that I’m involved in provides the greatest benefit.

Cynicism with a sense of humour. It always amuses me that huge gains are typically put down to coaching, nutrition, a new training programme and a great work ethic - as though a million other athletes don't have any of that.

Pressups (and Jama Aden holding a stopwatch) are essentials.

PEDs work, if someone does make huge jumps in performances, you should be suspicious. One of the best examples of what rocket fuel does to a ok runner is Cathal Lombard.

https://www.iaaf.org/athletes/ireland/cathal-lombard-138431

Dan Salpeter wrote:

Sick

And funny.

Really? 'Ped complainers'? That's your name for people who are anti-doping, and you accuse them of being ped users themselves who are bitter it didn't work for them?

Dan Salpeter wrote:

Sick

And funny.

His comment is not remotely funny. You come across as a moron Dan. I do not pretend to know whether you and your wife cheat but you appear to be a jerk.