Just read the article. Wow, 44 races in 12 years. And he may have (or probably) cheated in every one. But as of now there are only three DQ’s. As far as I know there is no statement from CIM about what caused their two (is that true?), just FM claiming there was a problem with his splits and he agreed with them very graciously. And I don’t like the wording used by LAM in their DQ. Did anyone else think they seemed to tip toe around the real issue? Nothing they said can’t be explained by FM’s phony pee story. He can say he re-entered the course in a slightly different place (like one building down) and there was an eyewitness of it. So big deal. As for the impossible split he can say well that’s an issue with the chip or mat and he’ll once again agree that it’s wrong. LAM, or any other race, if they actually have the evidence, need to be blunt and say FM re-entered the course 6 miles from where he exited it and eyewitnesses saw him get into or out of a car, etc. Otherwise it gives FM wiggle room to keep lying. And for some reason that bugs me.
CIM made a brief statement, it was included in my initial article. What you would expect. Suspicious splits, lack of photos.