FoxNews (yeah, I know, stick with me here), is doing backflips over the Cohen hearing being "scheduled" for the same day Trump was in NK. Distraction, etc.
Yet not a peep about Alex Jones being on Rogan the same day, as well. Distraction?
No matter. AOC unearthed more in her 5 minutes than almost everything we suspected prior, and Mueller is coming no matter what. Oh, and Hannity implicated himself. I couldn't write this comedy if I tried.
whemmy wrote:
Rato. wrote:
Or every time you post an opposing view you call them a dunce without presenting your own evidence.
I'm not presenting evidence that something doesn't exist or isn't true, such as Santa Claus or the earth being flat or the Clinton's running an underage sex trafficking ring. The onus is on you to prove that it is true.
Why not, should be easy, no? The fact you think this falls at the Clinton’s feet suggest you have no idea.
The media is super controlled. AOC bring drama and people love that.
Alex Jones is kinda interesting. I saw this on YouTube in response to his interview with joe.
Rato. wrote:
whemmy wrote:
I'm not presenting evidence that something doesn't exist or isn't true, such as Santa Claus or the earth being flat or the Clinton's running an underage sex trafficking ring. The onus is on you to prove that it is true.
Why not, should be easy, no? The fact you think this falls at the Clinton’s feet suggest you have no idea.
Because proving a negative is illogical. As is pizzagate.
whemmy wrote:
Rato. wrote:
Why not, should be easy, no? The fact you think this falls at the Clinton’s feet suggest you have no idea.
Because proving a negative is illogical. As is pizzagate.
Proving a negative is neither illogical nor difficult. You can easily disprove Santa with a reducto ad absurdum argument, for instance. Sounds like you are unable to disprove pizzagate but that doesn't mean such a thing would be impossible.
Start with the Podesta emails and go from there. The rabbit hole is endless. Considering people are being silenced in regards to pizzagate, that should be enough evidence to know there is something to it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHGFf7xxcF8
That's the only reasonable coverage anyone in the mainstream media gave...and he was silenced because of it. And what he went into is just the tip of the iceberg if you really start looking into it.
nagoya wrote:
yawntown wrote:
I’m not surprised that a guy who trolls an online running messageboard for kicks would feel that way.
Why does that surprise you, friend?
It's called reading nagoya. Try it.
It will not only cut down on clueless bufoon responses like this one from you, but will decrease your chance of falling for the internet crap slingers like alex jones.
"We know they are hiding something because they aren't speaking and/or being silenced" is a classic formulation of conspiracy theories. Entirely circular logic.
And you my friend are what they call a sheep. Don’t trust so easily
This is the first I even heard of this podcast, yet the Cohen hearing is being talked about everywhere. Seriously LOL at the idiots that think this is so news worthy/ground breaking and 'upstaging' Trump's long time lawyer spilling the beans on how corrupt he is.
All I have to say about this is what freaking kind of podcast goes on for 4 and a half hours? I drive a lot for work and often am on the road for 3-4 hours at a time going between different cities. I would go nuts if I tried to listen to a 4+ hour podcast. I do not have to listen to this to come to the conclusion that it is 80% garbage. No one on this earth can talk about anything interesting or present any kind of arguments that are well thought out for four and a half hours.
Sure, people who insist on using their critical thinking are sheep. That's for sure how it works.
Fsgsg wrote:
And you my friend are what they call a sheep. Don’t trust so easily
If you don't think it is possible for people in power to be into human trafficking and pedophilia, just look at Jimmy Savile and Edward Heath.
Or look at the Franklin Savings and Loan/Boys Town scandal.
Look into the case of Johnny Gosch.
dfasfdas wrote:
Or look at the Franklin Savings and Loan/Boys Town scandal.
Look into the case of Johnny Gosch.
Or the Catholic Church. In fact if I said the Catholic Church was involved in widespread abuse of children 10 years ago, people on here would say I was a loon conspiracy theorist. Well guess what.....
Sure, debunk claims nobody has made and then it makes it likely that the totally unrelated claims you are making are thereby proven. Nobody has claimed it is not possible for people in power to be into human trafficking and pedophilia. I'd never heard of either of these two gentlemen, but it appears they were both accused of pedophilia (did not see anything about trafficking) but there were not enough evidence to sustain charges. Even if guilty, that has absolutely no bearing on the alleged Pizzagate.
dasfdsf wrote:
If you don't think it is possible for people in power to be into human trafficking and pedophilia, just look at Jimmy Savile and Edward Heath.
10 years ago, you mean years after the Boston Globe spotlight team won a Pulitzer prize for exposing widespread abuse of children by the Catholic Church?
Rato. wrote:
Or the Catholic Church. In fact if I said the Catholic Church was involved in widespread abuse of children 10 years ago, people on here would say I was a loon conspiracy theorist. Well guess what.....
crazies R us wrote:
10 years ago, you mean years after the Boston Globe spotlight team won a Pulitzer prize for exposing widespread abuse of children by the Catholic Church?
Rato. wrote:
Or the Catholic Church. In fact if I said the Catholic Church was involved in widespread abuse of children 10 years ago, people on here would say I was a loon conspiracy theorist. Well guess what.....
Not so crazy now is it. Others that are classified as conspiracies now will be proven with time, you just wait.
crazies R us wrote:
Sure, debunk claims nobody has made and then it makes it likely that the totally unrelated claims you are making are thereby proven.
Nobody has claimed it is not possible for people in power to be into human trafficking and pedophilia. I'd never heard of either of these two gentlemen, but it appears they were both accused of pedophilia (did not see anything about trafficking) but there were not enough evidence to sustain charges.
Even if guilty, that has absolutely no bearing on the alleged Pizzagate.
dasfdsf wrote:
If you don't think it is possible for people in power to be into human trafficking and pedophilia, just look at Jimmy Savile and Edward Heath.
If that is the misinformed conclusion you have come to then you need to educate yourself on Savile, he used power and influence to suppress exposure when he was alive, despite many knowing. It’s a case in point and demonstrates how pizzagate that is x1000 is possible.