Stanford canceled their home XC meet this year. Not sure why they did that but the high school teams really counted on them hosting a big meet. If they don’t care about home XC, maybe they won’t care about home track meets either. In that case, ops becomes secondary to filling the other positions.
Cardinals wrote:
Look, all we want is a distance coach so we have a plan for the XC season. All this other stuff is insane BS. An opps person to run the meets is a close second though.
Your new Director certainly has already said no to Ryan Vanhoy and fiancé, Robert and Rita Gary, Corey Ihmels, and Joe Franklin. Expect a very young men’s coach with only a little bit of experience or a former alelite athlete.
Dear Cardinal wrote:
Cardinals wrote:
Look, all we want is a distance coach so we have a plan for the XC season. All this other stuff is insane BS. An opps person to run the meets is a close second though.
Your new Director certainly has already said no to Ryan Vanhoy and fiancé, Robert and Rita Gary, Corey Ihmels, and Joe Franklin. Expect a very young men’s coach with only a little bit of experience or a former alelite athlete.
I have been telling everyone I can that Ondrasek is going to be the distance coach at Stanford for as long as I can. It’s done. Just waiting on other positions to be filled for the announcement. This isn’t brian science people.
Thiat would be the dumbest move ever. What has he ever done to merit getting this opportunity?
Dumbest ever wrote:
Thiat would be the dumbest move ever. What has he ever done to merit getting this opportunity?
He was at OU and Texas A&M before that. He knows what it takes to run for a big program and his approach is very scientific. Other than Magness at Houston, you can’t find a better young coach that understands the new science of running. Stanford would be crazy to pass on him, and from what I have heard they have not. Look for the announcement soon.
What’s going on at OU? Anyone have any idea?
Yaterat wrote:
Dumbest ever wrote:
Other than Magness at Houston, you can’t find a better young coach that understands the new science of running.
Dude this is about the dumbest thing I’ve seen on here in a long while. Not a chance, cheerleader!
Furd terguson wrote:
What’s going on at OU? Anyone have any idea?
Every XC guy has been spotted at another university in the last few weeks. Look for massive transfers out of the program. I am not sure how they are going to field a XC team with at least 5 guys so they can record a score.
Everyone should care wrote:
focus wrote:
It's not Stanford's job, nor the job of it's coaches to support distance running for the US nor the World. Their job it to take care of THEIR student-athletes. Even if Stanford stopped hosting home meets, distance running will go on.
I'm not saying the meets/DirOps should be the highest priority of JJ/Stanford Athletics. I am saying that the Stanford meets are the most important part of Stanford Track & Field to the sport of Track & Field. I think things have gone astray a bit here because some think that all the posts about the the Stanford meets/Ops are by the same person. They are not.
I understand and respect what you're saying. I'm just saying that I don't believe it's Stanford's job serve the sport, but rather to serve their own constituents.
If Stanford doesn't host meets it could even be a good thing for distance runners if the quality of competition spreads out a bit. No doubt the large majority of NCAA qualifiers come from Stanford meets; so getting into a meet at Stanford is often make or break to getting an NCAA qualifier. Politics (getting into their meets) become more important to qualifying than necessarily being one of the top runners.
At the same time, I don't care because if you can't qualify to the first round by racing at a smaller competition, then you're not a legit player anyway. The point (to me) isn't simply to get to the first round, but advance through rounds and ultimately score.
Palo Alto XC wrote:
Stanford canceled their home XC meet this year. Not sure why they did that but the high school teams really counted on them hosting a big meet. If they don’t care about home XC, maybe they won’t care about home track meets either. In that case, ops becomes secondary to filling the other positions.
Lol they canceled it two years ago and it was fine. Don't be so dramatic.
Dear Cardinal wrote:
Your new Director certainly has already said no to Ryan Vanhoy and fiancé, Robert and Rita Gary, Corey Ihmels, and Joe Franklin. Expect a very young men’s coach with only a little bit of experience or a former alelite athlete.
I know for a hard cold fact that one of the coaches listed here never ever considered the position and there was never a chance of it happening. So therefore, the concepts of the other coaches listed here being in consideration/turned down are highly dubious at best. I'd chalk this poster up to being a troll.
focus wrote:
Everyone should care wrote:
I'm not saying the meets/DirOps should be the highest priority of JJ/Stanford Athletics. I am saying that the Stanford meets are the most important part of Stanford Track & Field to the sport of Track & Field. I think things have gone astray a bit here because some think that all the posts about the the Stanford meets/Ops are by the same person. They are not.
I understand and respect what you're saying. I'm just saying that I don't believe it's Stanford's job serve the sport, but rather to serve their own constituents.
If Stanford doesn't host meets it could even be a good thing for distance runners if the quality of competition spreads out a bit. No doubt the large majority of NCAA qualifiers come from Stanford meets; so getting into a meet at Stanford is often make or break to getting an NCAA qualifier. Politics (getting into their meets) become more important to qualifying than necessarily being one of the top runners.
At the same time, I don't care because if you can't qualify to the first round by racing at a smaller competition, then you're not a legit player anyway. The point (to me) isn't simply to get to the first round, but advance through rounds and ultimately score.
You're looking at it from a collegiate perspective, and that's fine. But the perspective from those in the pro/international side of things would be quite different.
Just heard the two finalists for Stanford are Gerry Lindgren and Jack Daniels. Heard it here first, take it to the bank.
What if JJ forgot he had to hire people?
Point Park new coach (was interim) :
and Frostburg State.... long way from SW Oklahoma
Dear Cardinal wrote:
Cardinals wrote:
Look, all we want is a distance coach so we have a plan for the XC season. All this other stuff is insane BS. An opps person to run the meets is a close second though.
Your new Director certainly has already said no to Ryan Vanhoy and fiancé, Robert and Rita Gary, Corey Ihmels, and Joe Franklin. Expect a very young men’s coach with only a little bit of experience or a former alelite athlete.
Too bad some of those coaches named actually said no thanks to Stanford. Not the other way around. Stanford may be a great name and tradition but that doesn't mean everyone is drawn to it.
Chelsea France to Maryland for distance.
Wasn’t she JUST named cross country coach at SCAD in June?
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Guys between age of 45 and 55 do you think about death or does it seem far away
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06