Scrotevett wrote:
Deanouk wrote:
There are only 3 words in your post that have any worth: ‘could have’ and ‘alleged’. And those 3 words perfectly highlight the fact that there is no evidence and therefore no argument.
You’re absolutely correct. So I’m sure you’ll unbiasedly apply the same logic to El G, right?
C'mon Nips, you can do better than this. We've pointed out about a dozen different reasons to suspect El G. All you can do is keep repeating - 'but Coe could have blood doped, Coe could have taken steroids'. And that is only an 'argument' if you accept the premise that 'everybody dopes', which you can't supply any argument for at all either, and to which I've supplied numerous arguments against (for example, examples of other sports such as MMA, the healthy long lives of most of the top 50's and 60's guys who were supposed to be all loading up on crystal meth and dbol).