Yes I do BELIEVE NASA faked the moon landings (but wouldn't be me life on it).
The reasons I believe they faked them are quite a number. Here's a few that stand out to me:
1) All the computer tech they had back then is less than we have now on a calculator - you can't control a 6-9 million part machine with that little.
2) The video of the "final take off" from the Moon seems way too precision (with the capsule within the frame despite the ever-changing acceleration). The would-be camera was supposedly remote-controlled from Earth - just the time delay for the relaying of signals would seem to make that impossible.
3) The quality and content of the photos - taken from cameras attached to their space suits where they couldn't even see precisely what they were looking at.
4) The tiny amount of space within their capsules as compared to the necessary huge amount of space to take all that would have really been needed: lots of batteries (both primary and back-up), a lunar rover ...
5) The totally flimsy looking "walls" (seemingly connected by duct tape).
6) Photos that show parts of the Lunar Module clearly, when they were in the shadows and thus un-illuminated.
7) That the US was well over a decade behind the Soviets, yet "caught up" in just a very few years - while the Soviets never got there. (I don't find it convincing the claim that the Soviets would have exposed the farce - because there are endless examples of the buying off of politicians; if the price is right.)
8) We still don't have anything close to fold-up cars almost 50 years after they supposedly had ones they took to and drove on the Moon.
9) #1: The Van Allen Belts (and beyond) would require manned capsules to be enclosed by thick amounts of lead - something NASA has never claimed they had.
10) Related to "7)" and "9)" above: that no country has sent humans above LOW Earth Orbit since then.
I don't buy one bit that there supposedly no reason to go back to the Moon.
Bonus points: NASA supposedly lot almost all the original tapes (cartons and cartons of them) of what was supposedly THE most historic achievement humans ever made. That they didn't have/make copies and lost the only ones seems totally unreasonable. and ...
NOT ONE SINGLE FOTO WITH STARS IN IT! The sky from the Moon's surface should be blazing with stars at least some of the time when they were supposedly there. Yet they didn't manage to take ONE single foto of them? Not one? When just one would have been so convincing? (NASA even has art-work depicting a would-be Lunar view in which the sky is chock full of stars.
btw, the first time I started to doubt the Apollo missions was while they were going on. I was a very heavy-duty peace-justice organizer back then. I began to notice this very curious pattern of that whenever we scheduled major anti-Vietnam-War rallies, NASA scheduled their latest Apollo mission. This seemed to happen repeatedly. We'd put in all this work; even the press would predict we'd have huge turnouts - yet, seemingly due to the "successes" of the Apollo Program, many fewer turned out and we ended up talking more about Apollo than we did about the slaughter of 3 million innocent victims.
The timing began to seem too "coincidental".