John Utah wrote:
1. Amateur sports are not intended to be a profit center. They are funded by the school. Do any high school sports make money? No, but they are all still there.
2. Do some research. The vast majority of football programs lose money. If you see something that says otherwise then there is some Enron-type accounting going on. Remember that there are something like 120 d1 schools. Also, most of the p5 schools are not Ohio State, Texas, etc. there are more Kansas type schools in p5 than usc type schools.
Also, even at the big time schools, their expenses are over the top. Totally over the top.
You absolutely make no sense at all Johnny Utah.🤔 The non-revenue sports (e.g., XC, T&F, wrestling, volleyball, etc.) have to be supported by the revenue making sports which are only football & B-ball. For example, all of Nebraska's non-revenue sports lost dough last year (imagine that) and only the football team made revenue...which is supporting these non-revenue making sports. Better thank the Husker faithful that sells out 85,000 seat Memorial Stadium every fall Saturday.
And you're wrong Johnny Utah; a lot of FBS programs have made revenue. And the lower tier P5 schools for football (e.g., Kansas...that you pointed out) get revenue sharing from the bowl games that other teams from the conference go to. Go to a BCS bowl and that's a big payday for the conference. And besides, Kansas B-ball is one of the nations top programs (who would have thought) and brings in some revenue.
Newsflash: FBS football continues to support & SAVE the non-revenue making sports...nothing new there.
https://m.herosports.com/college-football/nebraska-football-athletics-revenue-volleyball-17-million-ahahhttps://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/5/6/11362094/ncaa-football-revenue-chart-profit