✔
worked for me wrote:
He's not wrong.
tony the tiger wrote:
Did they drug test these guys after the race ?
I doubt it
Go Mo wrote:
Why would Mo run this minor race?
shohohe wrote:
In this podcast (Danish) at 26:46:
"If Mo Farah was there tomorrow, he would not win. He wouldn't. He would demand a lot of money to come, and he would be a huge crowd puller (...), but he wouldn't win. First, he is not hungry enough, and second, he cannot run fast enough."
The race was won in the fourth fastest time ever in 58:40. Three men under 59 minutes, five under Mo's PR of 59:32, seven under one hour.
Interesting... wrote:
Are the athletes drug tested? I'm suspiscous of this half marathon as well as the Czech road races.
tony the tiger wrote:
Did they drug test these guys after the race ?
I doubt it
just my two cents wrote:
Drug testing is best performed in the buildup to a major race. Dopers will go off-cycle in the weeks leading up to the target race to avoid a positive finding in the likely post-competition test. But they are using whatever they can during the buildup.
So for instance - if you wanted to nab anyone doping for NYC - the best time to test them would be to do it right now while the athletes are about 6 weeks out and in the meat of their marathon training.
Zede wrote:
shohohe wrote:
In this podcast (Danish) at 26:46:
"If Mo Farah was there tomorrow, he would not win. He wouldn't. He would demand a lot of money to come, and he would be a huge crowd puller (...), but he wouldn't win. First, he is not hungry enough, and second, he cannot run fast enough."
The race was won in the fourth fastest time ever in 58:40. Three men under 59 minutes, five under Mo's PR of 59:32, seven under one hour.
So, people winning in Copenhagen could run a 26.40/50 10km? Mmmhhh i don't think so.
Farah Maybe is not hungry enough, but could be fast enough.
