Could Paul Edwards, thrower banned for life, be telling the truth?

wadawwade wrote:

Lean Cuisine wrote:

I'm no lawyer, but the legal counsel against Edwards seems to be saying "The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth are insignificant. Only the facts that deem Mr. Edwards guilty are relevant." If you have a few minutes, try reading this. It sounds like a hatchet job.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a5/Paul_Edwards_Athlete%2C_High_Court_ruling_November_2013.pdf

Worth a re read as the breaches by Kings College are clear and then the covers up are clear and now recent posts say they have broken the Data Protection Laws.

Why won’t Doping Control realise that they have to abide by the law?

How did Kings College get away without doing calibration curves to set the machines and ensure no contamination.

Like getting on weighing scales and someone had already set them at 5 lbs.You get a bum result.

How did they get away with using a HACKSAW to open the sample?

davies report wrote:

How did they get away with using a HACKSAW to open the sample?

And get away with do 58 analysis on the B sample ar 4 ml for each one. Who provided the urine.?

Why did UKSport explicitly forbid the disclosure of the chain of custody data that they held that related to the two days the sample went missing.

Why was the DHL waybill never used but UKS said it went that method but still went missing.

davies report wrote:

Why was the DHL waybill never used but UKS said it went that method but still went missing.

Why did UK Sport forbid the discussion on the Davis Report on the hidden data of the test on Edwards urine?

davies report wrote:

davies report wrote:

Why was the DHL waybill never used but UKS said it went that method but still went missing.

Why did UK Sport forbid the discussion on the Davis Report on the hidden data of the test on Edwards urine?

Why was Edwards initially refused the test data on the argument that to give him the lab results would be a health and safety breach and threaten his health if given them?

Yes … this is true!

all the questions and no answers, is this just spam then....

samulih wrote:

all the questions and no answers, is this just spam then....

The answers need to come from the various Doping Authorities.

There was and still is a continual cover up as to what actually happened to Edwards sample.

More importantly, for others, is how is the power of the drug testers to be controlled when they join together to keep the truth from coming out.

The Information Commissionaire had to use the law to get the release of the test data; so Kings College fought to release the data til the bitter end.

In other cases Kings gave all the test data freely and it did not require the Law to make them.

Why did they refuse to provide the test data to Edwards?

Kings college and uks sport told Parliament that they had done calibration work ups for Edwards but was this true?

What do you think?

Yes; Uk Parliament.

So if Kings knew they had lied to Parliament they would have every reason to hide the test data from Edwards. A cover up, and as several parties involved a conspiracy of a cover up, to deny Edwards justice.

So this would explain why they tried to use health and safety law as a last ditch attempt from keeping Edwards from his test data.

They also claimed commercial confidentiality for hiding the calibration data even though it is an universal procedure.

So; two silly reasons why Edwards could not have the calibration data that was sat there.

Then the Data Protection Law / Judge said that Kings College must produce the calibration curves that Kings College said that existed but refused to give.

So you would now think it would be a simple matter of handing them over.

Kings College ; the Doping Control Centre who did the test and gave the evidence; had their legal department state that they had never ever done the contemporaneous calibration curves.

So that there was nothing to hand over even though they gave loads of silly reasons why they could not be handed over.

So a massive big set of lies which also involved UK Sport.

And no calibration means that the results are invalid.

I N V A L I D !

And they all knew this all of the time.

Now come on Rojo ; this is a clear cut stitch up.