Never ever wrote:
Well, if you understand the history of UKS/UKAD/IAAF/IOC, you understand that Edwards has no chance whatsoever.
Sorry!
Michelle V wrote:This seems nothing to do with the Edwards case .
Let's all keep focus .
The power of the internet is such that the truth is harder than ever to hide. Many people in society will view someone being falsely accused and convicted as a worse situation than someone doping and getting away with it. Combine those two things and suddenly one has a chance at justice where they wouldn't have in the past.
I've been reading about Paul and this case on and off since starting the thread and I'm still quite confused as to all the different players, how they tie together, what all was not done by the book, etc. Maybe it's just me, but being able to look at a single image, likely a flowchart, could help the general public understand this much better and much faster.
A flowchart can easily be posted on social media as well, whereas the amount of text written out in standard paragraph form is too voluminous to hold the attention of many of us in this information age.