So if she is not doping, how do you explain the 21.66 and 10.83. There is nowhere on this earth a female can run below 22 secs and 11 secs and not be on performance enhancing drugs. The IAAF/WADA has been covering up positive tests.
So if she is not doping, how do you explain the 21.66 and 10.83. There is nowhere on this earth a female can run below 22 secs and 11 secs and not be on performance enhancing drugs. The IAAF/WADA has been covering up positive tests.
Think This One Through "Coach" wrote:
TrackCoach wrote:You can't say a female athlete is doping because they are muscular or becomes more muscular. With that logic, I would have to say 2/3rds of female sprinters are doping.
You really are not much of track coach to make a statement that "2/3rds of female sprinters are doping." You simply don't think things through by making such a ridiculous statement as that! If Dafne and the other "2/3rds of the female sprinters" are doping then why aren't they getting flagged on the steroidal & growth hormone module of the ABP? It's impossible to use PE substances at a dose large enough to produce any significant performance-enhancing benefit without triggering a flag (recall that her name and any female sprinter wasn't on the hacked WADA list of suspicious or likely doping cases).
Also keep in mind they're storing the samples now for future retesting as the technology is evolving at more efficient detection capabilities of micro-dose usage of drugs. The last thing Dafne and other top sprinters would what is the utter embarrassment of one of their samples testing positive 5 or 10 yrs from now and everything they've worked so hard for going down the toilet in an instance.
With the new technological advancements and ABP of anti-doping it's not like the wild, crazy & free-for-all times of the pre-passport days. Think this one through "coach" as you're casting aspersions on these athletes without sufficient evidence to support your claims. 👈
You missed my point, I don't think 2/3rds of female sprinters are doping. I have been around female body builders and fitness competitor etc., I know that some girls have higher naturally accruing t-levels and bulk up easier those with lower T. Some girl struggle to put on muscle, while other have to scale back because they get too muscular.
Whoever said Dafne looks "feminine" made my night - still laughing lol!!
What ya talking about?
Take a look at her Rio medal party.
Look at the pretty smile and beautiful eyes.
She's overwhelmed with emotion.
She's an attractive women.
I like Dafne 😊
Macdaddy wrote:
Whoever said Dafne looks "feminine" made my night - still laughing lol!!
What ya talking about?
Take a look at her Rio medal party.
Look at the pretty smile and beautiful eyes.
She's overwhelmed with emotion.
She's an attractive women.
I like Dafne 😊
https://youtu.be/4jBo-mY_bCsShe looks skinny and has breasts, maybe it's the off season but a hardcore doper would look much more muscular and leaner. That said she is still running doper type times and could be micro dosing.I like Dafne wrote:
Macdaddy wrote:Whoever said Dafne looks "feminine" made my night - still laughing lol!!
What ya talking about?
Take a look at her Rio medal party.
Look at the pretty smile and beautiful eyes.
She's overwhelmed with emotion.
She's an attractive women.
I like Dafne 😊
https://youtu.be/4jBo-mY_bCs
they are both roided out of their skulls !
actually youre wrong.im heavily into body building,and women cannot stack on muscle naturally,not without a lot of drugs.the only way they can do it naturally is if they already have large amounts of testosterone in the first place,probably making them genetically intersex.as for 2/3rds of female sprinters doping,id say its much MUCH more than that,at the elite leval.and even higher with men.when their trapezius sticks up theyre doping,period.
Uncle Beemer wrote:
covfefea wrote:Right, so the failure in reasoning here is that acne means unnaturally higher levels of testosterone-no woman can have acne without steroids as it's impossible.
Who said anything about acne?
High levels of testosterone.
Look at her for Chrissakes.
There are women who can achieve that type of musculature naturally with weight work. They exist. They are rare, but they exist.
High testosterone isn't the only cause of acne. Her Mother apparently also had high acne into her 30s. Do you think her Mother was doping?
Think This One Through "Coach" wrote:
Also keep in mind they're storing the samples now for future retesting as the technology is evolving at more efficient detection capabilities of micro-dose usage of drugs. The last thing Dafne and other top sprinters would what is the utter embarrassment of one of their samples testing positive 5 or 10 yrs from now and everything they've worked so hard for going down the toilet in an instance.
With the new technological advancements and ABP of anti-doping it's not like the wild, crazy & free-for-all times of the pre-passport days. Think this one through "coach" as you're casting aspersions on these athletes without sufficient evidence to support your claims. 👈
Hi Gary!
Right, that's why Bolt and Gay and Gatlin and Farah and so on are all clean since at least 2009. And the lady sprinters run 10.8 or under because of their talent, and because of the Dutch women being tall and muscular. You crack me up.
I do agree however that today's athletes' doping is somewhat curbed. No 10.6s anymore, or low 1:50s over 800 m (except maybe for Caster). Doesn't mean they are clean. Just look at the wide range of allowed off-scores for example.
El Keniano wrote:
So what's her "beef" with Elaine Thompson?
Is that a Freudian slip?
compelling Dynamos wrote:
you work with Matt Centrowitz?
Typing Dynamos wrote:If acne means doping, the half of my office mates are doping like crazy!!!
They must really be hitting the needle hard since they have worse acne tha Dafne!
Glad I know why some of these accounting ladies are in need of skin care, it's the freaking drugs!!!
😂😂😂😂😂
Macdaddy wrote:
Whoever said Dafne looks "feminine" made my night - still laughing lol!!
She's muscular but still looks very female (nice legs). Now compare her to very muscular, unfeminine types such as Semenya, Wambui and that doped-up beast Yanit who tested positive for T & stanozolol. You'll soon change your mind and stop laughing 😉
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nevin_Yan%C4%B1t_Baltac%C4%B1My w8 is f9 wrote:
She looks skinny and has breasts, maybe it's the off season but a hardcore doper would look much more muscular and leaner. That said she is still running doper type times and could be micro dosing.
Off season?
That photo I believe was taken a short time after Rio during a party celebrating her silver.
If she's running doper's times, then so is the likes of Felix, Bowie & Gardner. But yet there's much less aspersions & accusations of these athletes. Is it because Dafne is simply more muscular than these gals? 🤔
I like her looks and admirer that aggressiveness during competition. She's not intimidated by the Americans & Jamaicans.
She makes the Dutch proud.
I like Dafne.
Think This One Through "Coach" wrote:
TrackCoach wrote:You can't say a female athlete is doping because they are muscular or becomes more muscular. With that logic, I would have to say 2/3rds of female sprinters are doping.
You really are not much of track coach to make a statement that "2/3rds of female sprinters are doping." You simply don't think things through by making such a ridiculous statement as that! If Dafne and the other "2/3rds of the female sprinters" are doping then why aren't they getting flagged on the steroidal & growth hormone module of the ABP? It's impossible to use PE substances at a dose large enough to produce any significant performance-enhancing benefit without triggering a flag (recall that her name and any female sprinter wasn't on the hacked WADA list of suspicious or likely doping cases).
Also keep in mind they're storing the samples now for future retesting as the technology is evolving at more efficient detection capabilities of micro-dose usage of drugs. The last thing Dafne and other top sprinters would what is the utter embarrassment of one of their samples testing positive 5 or 10 yrs from now and everything they've worked so hard for going down the toilet in an instance.
With the new technological advancements and ABP of anti-doping it's not like the wild, crazy & free-for-all times of the pre-passport days. Think this one through "coach" as you're casting aspersions on these athletes without sufficient evidence to support your claims. 👈
LOL. So, you know the only reason anything came to light about Sochi, and RUSADA was because of a journalist.
And you know the only reason the IAAF's most recent bribery scandal was because the scale of corruption was so great international law enforcement made arrests.
I don't know if Dafne is doping or not, but, the IAAF certainly doesn't care if an athlete dopes if they attract an audience, and win.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
I don't know if Dafne is doping or not, but, the IAAF certainly doesn't care if an athlete dopes if they attract an audience, and win.
How do you know if "the IAAF doesn't care if an athlete dopes if they attract an audience, and win?" Any specific examples, with proof, of athletes attracting audiences and winning where the IAAF allows them to dope? On the contrary, if an athlete isn't attracting an audience nor winning, the IAAF would then be concerned if they're doping?
Using your logic on this; where would you say Sumgong fits into your equation? I don't know if she attracts audiences being on the roads, but she did won gold on the sport's biggest stage. So, is Sumgong one of those athletes not important enough to get protection, and therefore the IAAF allowed the positive test for EPO? 🤔
igf-1 lr3 ..........the speed peptide .
other peds but this is the important one
after the worlds might start to see where all these fast times and speed
is coming from ,
countries performances built on this stuff and all wada/iaaf aided
You said that vNiekerk is using this. Shouldn't he be much bigger?
Speak My Mind wrote:
So if she is not doping, how do you explain the 21.66 and 10.83. There is nowhere on this earth a female can run below 22 secs and 11 secs and not be on performance enhancing drugs. The IAAF/WADA has been covering up positive tests.
Testosterone.
See for example the Jamaican clenbuterol positives, covered up by IAAF, and Radcliffe's passport violation, also covered up by the IAAF.