If being gay is not a choice then how is it possible that 98% are gay when that number is maybe 3% in the general population. Just pure coincidence that only gay women can play top level basketball? Self selecting?
If being gay is not a choice then how is it possible that 98% are gay when that number is maybe 3% in the general population. Just pure coincidence that only gay women can play top level basketball? Self selecting?
There are only about five attractive lesbians in the world, most look like Rosie O'Donnell.
You need to browse the internet more bubba.
No dunks here wrote:
It is a credit to the economics profession that the labor theory of value has largely fallen out of style. There is, however, one sector of the economy in which it continues to be taken seriously: sports.
Well the labor theory of value is vague in itself and it would be impossible to value the good. And I’m not sure the labor theory of value applies to sports... If it was, sports would have zero value because it really does have zero value in terms of social necessity.
Lets face it, lesbians athletes tend to at least look like they have more testosterone on average. So what you have his someone with higher testosterone roughing up someone with lower testosterone. It may seem personal and it well could be, but it could also be a bit like a man playing basketball versus a woman and not feeling any social stigma about playing rough like they do with other men. It's just how they play.
