Do you plan to get euthanized / doctor assisted suicide?

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

-0997p wrote:

Prove it: In the early 1960s, the out of-wedlock birth rate in the USA was about 5-7% and direct abortion was rare. Then the sexual revolution,

Let's get back to punishing women for having sex. Churches were full then, too. Good times if you were white and male.

The most ironic part of your factoid is the enormous number of church-attending women getting abortions now. The hypocrisy is just amazing. How do you think those utilization numbers got so big?

BTw, isn't god a forgiving entity? Just ask God for forgiveness and it's all good. Oh, wait.. you want to tell others how to live. No thanks. I like my social and religious freedom just fine.

You make some of the weakest arguments on this board and they are quite ironic. Killing innocent human beings denies their every freedom. Further your complaint has this form: pop_pop!_v2.2.1 tells others that they cannot tell others how to live. You, pop_pop!_v2.2.1, are frequently face-palmingly and ironically stupid. You complain, bizarrely, that pro-lifers are punishing women for having sex. Where? Yet vivisecting human fetuses never qualifies as punishment according to you. And "punishment" would even be an understatement for the inhumanity and cruelty that abortion inflicts on the unborn.

You complain that pro-lifers tell others how to live. Yet while you do not tell others that they cannot live, you simply kill them.

I plan to drop seven hits of acid and troll my death on letsrun.

" I'm dieing now. Man does this feel great. Shit the keyboard's melting."

G.K. Chesterton on suicide: The man who kills himself, kills all men; as far as he is concerned he wipes out the world.

I was wondering wrote:

Hospice Care Giver wrote:

[quote]rcubed wrote:

I took care of one parent for just under 2 weeks of at home hospice care while dying of pancreatic cancer. This parent had survived two previous cases of brain cancer. .

Are you taliking about a "patient" or a " parent" in your reply? Big difference...

It was one of my parents who was dying. I am not a professional health care provider.

I'll add that the oncologist had scheduled a medical procedure to confirm pancreatic cancer. I asked why given the scans and other tests that were performed that indicated pancreatic cancer. He then said yes, it was pancreatic cancer and the test was not needed other than to determine medical treatment. We would have needed to drive 50 miles to the nearest hospital that performs the procedure. I also asked about treatment. He said it was harsh and typically say a man in his mid 50s may choose to go through the treatment in hopes of surviving for a few additional weeks to have a little more time to spend with their wife and children. My parent was weak and in their early 70s. This is someone who had gone through surgery for brain cancer once and chemo twice for brain cancer. I then asked about obtaining hospice care help when the time came. I thought that was a few months away. Little did I know that we would need to bring in hospice care the next day for a hospital bed and daily visits and that my parent would die within 2 weeks. Hospice offered to take my parent to one of their facilities. We declined because my parent did not want to go to a hospice care facility or hospital at end. This parent had cared for their mother as she died from breast cancer.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

-0997p wrote:

Prove it: In the early 1960s, the out of-wedlock birth rate in the USA was about 5-7% and direct abortion was rare. Then the sexual revolution,

Let's get back to punishing women for having sex. Churches were full then, too. Good times if you were white and male.

The most ironic part of your factoid is the enormous number of church-attending women getting abortions now. The hypocrisy is just amazing. How do you think those utilization numbers got so big?

BTw, isn't god a forgiving entity? Just ask God for forgiveness and it's all good. Oh, wait.. you want to tell others how to live. No thanks. I like my social and religious freedom just fine.

Yet black families WERE in some ways better off then than now: for blacks in the USA, the out-of-wedlock birth rates were about 20% circa 1960 versus roughly 70% today on top of a disproportionately high abortion rate.

To use your STUPID tactic: Why are you punishing black people?

I am afflicted with a nonlethal, but painful and debilitating chronic degenerative illness. Five years ago I procured a stash of pentobarbital sodium from a foreign source so I can /myself when the time comes. It gives me great peace of mind.

To Hospice Caregiver,

Sorry for your loss. Pancreatic cancer is one of the worst to see in a person with cancer b/c it's one of the most painful and spreads very fast. Not only did your parent go through such with the brain tumor & chemo but hopefully they went peacefully at the end. You have to be a very strong & willed person to have gone what you have with your parents/family members. Hats off to you. Makes you certainly appreciate your health and life, right? Best wishes to you.

going to spend my file days in a drugged out coma on LSD, shrooms, etc.. I'll eventually die but I'll be trippin before I go.

Donearly wrote:

I plan to get assisted suicide at 75. I feel like anything past that I can't do what I want to do in the world and might start to not remember things, drive slow..etc.

Tell that to Ed Whitlock.

EvilMinded wrote:

Donearly wrote:

I plan to get assisted suicide at 75. I feel like anything past that I can't do what I want to do in the world and might start to not remember things, drive slow..etc.

Tell that to Ed Whitlock.

Looked up the Ed Whitlock Wikipedia entry. His marathon time has increased by an entire hour in just the last few years. His body is definitely breaking down at a very rapid rate.

Wise One wrote:

Shamika wrote:

this should be the goal of everybody...after the age of 100.

live till 100, then take it year by year, and when the time is right swallow the joy juice.

At 100 you would be senile already and most people would have died a painful death before them. 60 is more realistic.

You consistently strike me as dumb. Now I think you are dumb and young.

WiseArserer wrote:

Wise One wrote:

At 100 you would be senile already and most people would have died a painful death before them. 60 is more realistic.

You consistently strike me as dumb. Now I think you are dumb and young.

I wish I am dumb, then I wouldn't think so much about things and realize all the problems. But alas, I have a 130 IQ and am too smart.

Wise One wrote:

EvilMinded wrote:

Tell that to Ed Whitlock.

Looked up the Ed Whitlock Wikipedia entry. His marathon time has increased by an entire hour in just the last few years. His body is definitely breaking down at a very rapid rate.

And I add he should be killed. Put him on a list with those to be killed via abortion. Don't call it killing, though, and don't let those Terrorists - the Christians - find out.

If I get some disease that's extremely painful and/or causes dementia, yeah. I don't see the point living in total agony, unable to do anything, and exhausting everyone around me as I slowly descend into death.

When my grandmother was dying of lung cancer, she had a year or so that was OK, then rapidly went downhill until she had low blood oxygenation even with supplemental oxygen, struggled to talk, and finally had inoperable collapsed lungs. If I have to choose between a quick exit and slowly drowning in a hospital bed, I'll choose the former. And the state has no right to tell me I can't do that.

The Haberdasher wrote:

Yet black families WERE in some ways better off then than now: for blacks in the USA, the out-of-wedlock birth rates were about 20% circa 1960 versus roughly 70% today on top of a disproportionately high abortion rate.

To use your STUPID tactic: Why are you punishing black people?

White Christians, like the KKK, were still lynching black people back in 1960. I don't think you can call that better.

You have higher abortion rates nowadays because people make more informed choices before deciding to contribute through with a pregnancy be it accidental, rape, financial, or birth defects.

Wise One wrote:

The Haberdasher wrote:

Yet black families WERE in some ways better off then than now: for blacks in the USA, the out-of-wedlock birth rates were about 20% circa 1960 versus roughly 70% today on top of a disproportionately high abortion rate.

To use your STUPID tactic: Why are you punishing black people?

White Christians, like the KKK, were still lynching black people back in 1960. I don't think you can call that better.

Wisest One wrote:

Wise One wrote:

White Christians, like the KKK, were still lynching black people back in 1960. I don't think you can call that better.

Oh it was A LOT better; just compare the statistics for black on black crime in Chicago circa1960 compared to the last 5 years.

What does any of that have to do with assisted suicide or abortion, Dumbest One?

if god created everything, he created abortions too. So he must be cool with that.