Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Gina wrote:

agip wrote:

Classic example of Republicans literally not believing GOP policies are real.

This piece finds GOPers who will vote for trump, not believing Trump wants to take away coverage for people with preexisting conditions. When of course that is exactly what the GOP is trying to do and what it has been trying to do for years.

The cognitive dissonance is amazing. It's like Nazis thinking Hitler would actually be good for the Jews.

That Dems can't get these voters...tells you something. I'm not sure what, but something important.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/01/upshot/trump-pre-existing-conditions-polls.html

Good post and good points. Bigotry is a massive part of their love for Trump.

I find it funny that you associate bigotry only with Repubs/conservatives. Many Dems just hide their bigotry better. Remember when Joy Reid was found to be one of the biggest bigots around? Oh, she got a pass on that. A conservative would have been fired in a heartbeat. Just watch the Senate hearings of Amy Coney Barrett and get ready to see some exhaustive anti-Catholic bigotry.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Gina wrote:

You don’t understand what victory laps are. The above is not an example of a victory lap, it is a funny pun about how regularly you trip yourself up and make a fool out of yourself.

No one runs more victory laps for victories that haven’t happened than you, so sit down and shut up.

Wrong. You libs are already celebrating, just like in 2016.

I can only speak for myself. I didn’t even know let’s run existed in 2016, so you’re wrong there. You’re also wrong in so much as I have never made a prediction about the upcoming election.

No one does victory laps more than you, we are all mocking you because you’d built up the debates so much and it backfired. Own it.

Biden, like myself, is a Catholic.

Please quit with the Felony Campaign finance violations. There is NO evidence that he did any such thing. NONE.

Our country WOULD LOVE having a competent woman as president.

Trump HAS had great financial success. Sure he got some money from daddy but Forbes puts his net worth at $2.5 billion even as of September 2020. He HAS been a great businessman. Not a perfect one by any means but a great one nonetheless.

Hillary committed multiple FELONIES with her e-mails. You CAN NOT send classified e-mails over the internet EVEN if they don't say "CLASSIFIED" on the document itself. Again, she committed multiple felonies in regards to her e-mails. She was asked to turn over her e-mails. Instead she destroyed 30,000 e-mails and bleached and shattered her server! Those e-mails were not hers to destroy. What kind of person would do such a thing?

L L wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

To be clear, unless your sisters were paid to have those children, they are just sluts, not whores. Words matter.

Hold on.

Surrogates are often paid to have someone's baby. They aren't whores.

Without a monetary exchange none of them are whores.

Having babies from different men doesn't make a women a slut. At best that's a year between having sex with different men. Slut shaming is misogynistic.

And Alan could have 5 sisters who each have a husband and one of them had two kids.

Then his sisters would have 6 kids and 5 baby daddies.

1) A surrogate would not be a whore, no. Different manner of impregnation too there. There are exceptions to just about every rule.

2) "Without monetary exchange none of them are whores." Agreed. Money or something of value has to be passed along for a whore to be created.

3) Alan referred to the behavior of his sisters as them being "whores". I don't know if their behavior qualifies as a slut or a whore or not. I was just making the distinction between a slut and a whore and going with his assessment since he obviously knows them and I don't.

4) I agree that slut shaming is misogynistic. I didn't do that. A slut is a slut is a slut. It's a word that has a meaning, and that meaning is - "a person, especially a woman, who is sexually promiscuous." Note that a slut does not have to be a woman. I never shamed anyone. I actually never even called anyone a slut. I just told Alan that the word he probably meant was "slut" unless they were getting paid.

Every single piece of REAL DATA points to a MASSIVE Trump victory. MN will flip to red. Trump's rallies are pulling in democrats at every stop.

https://twitter.com/GOPChairwoman/status/1311698192313004037

Keep believing in your Nate Silver polls.

Ciro wrote:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-ex-national-security-adviser-154425315.html

We also heard for months how Trump was colluding with Putin. That narrative was rammed down our throats for months. Well, it turns out, according to Robert Mueller et al., that Trump never EVER EVER conspired or colluded with Putin. We are fed so many false narratives that I don't believe any of them unless it was clearly proved.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Every single piece of REAL DATA points to a MASSIVE Trump victory. MN will flip to red. Trump's rallies are pulling in democrats at every stop.

https://twitter.com/GOPChairwoman/status/1311698192313004037

Keep believing in your Nate Silver polls.

Genuinely curious how they would know the affiliation of those who attend rallies?

I’ve never attended one so maybe I’m missing something, can you explain Rigged?

You seem particularly desperate for the attention today Sally. Have a nice day.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Every single piece of REAL DATA points to a MASSIVE Trump victory. MN will flip to red. Trump's rallies are pulling in democrats at every stop.

https://twitter.com/GOPChairwoman/status/1311698192313004037

Keep believing in your Nate Silver polls.

From Ronna McDaniel....she of the “Joe Biden can’t run from his disastrous record responding to the coronavirus,” . “The truth hurts, Joe!” tweets?

Lets just say she's completely FOS.

Sally Vix wrote:

Ciro wrote:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-ex-national-security-adviser-154425315.html

We also heard for months how Trump was colluding with Putin. That narrative was rammed down our throats for months. Well, it turns out, according to Robert Mueller et al., that Trump never EVER EVER conspired or colluded with Putin. We are fed so many false narratives that I don't believe any of them unless it was clearly proved.

Yet you believe Trump's net worth which he tells Forbes and Forbes publishes.

Sally Vix wrote:

Ciro wrote:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-ex-national-security-adviser-154425315.html

We also heard for months how Trump was colluding with Putin. That narrative was rammed down our throats for months. Well, it turns out, according to Robert Mueller et al., that Trump never EVER EVER conspired or colluded with Putin. We are fed so many false narratives that I don't believe any of them unless it was clearly proved.

Put whatever label on it that you want.

Mueller spent almost 200 pages describing “numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign.” He found that “a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.” He also found that “a Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operations” against the Clinton campaign and then released stolen documents.

While Mueller was unable to establish a conspiracy between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians involved in this activity, he made it clear that “[a] statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.” In fact, Mueller also wrote that the “investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.”

agip wrote:

Nate's model is up another tick to 79%.

He's said that if the election were today, the model would be at 91%.

Because much can happen in 32 days, the model leaves some uncertainty.

Stop relying on the media driven, narrative pushing polls. They’re only used to fool the gullible and uninformed.

Enjoy your loss.

independent ohio voter wrote:

https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1311642338272440320?s=20

Democrats lose again!!!!

Disingenuous at best. She also asked how many thought Trump won, and just 2 put their hands up. The others all said no one won.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Every single piece of REAL DATA points to a MASSIVE Trump victory. MN will flip to red. Trump's rallies are pulling in democrats at every stop.

https://twitter.com/GOPChairwoman/status/1311698192313004037

Keep believing in your Nate Silver polls.

This is a learning moment. Your text that I bolded is a victory lap. Is it beginning to make sense for you?

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

agip wrote:

Nate's model is up another tick to 79%.

He's said that if the election were today, the model would be at 91%.

Because much can happen in 32 days, the model leaves some uncertainty.

Stop relying on the media driven, narrative pushing polls. They’re only used to fool the gullible and uninformed.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/trump-s-winning-voter-registration-battle-against-biden-key-states-n1241674

Enjoy your loss.

“Stop relying on the media” as he shares a media link ???

You couldn’t make it up.

Gina wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Every single piece of REAL DATA points to a MASSIVE Trump victory. MN will flip to red. Trump's rallies are pulling in democrats at every stop.

https://twitter.com/GOPChairwoman/status/1311698192313004037

Keep believing in your Nate Silver polls.

This is a learning moment. Your text that I bolded is a victory lap. Is it beginning to make sense for you?

I cannot wait to see your reaction on election night when your candidate loses.

This is Cankles 2.0