Here's a taste of things to come...
https://twitter.com/RanttMedia/status/1293289332615393282?s=20
Here's a taste of things to come...
https://twitter.com/RanttMedia/status/1293289332615393282?s=20
Racket wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Heads must be exploding at FOX and conservative radio right now. I absolutely love how tzees were baited with the Susan Rice idea, lol. What a let down.
You have a serious obsessive problem.
Who are you again?
Great news for Maya Rudolph!
Trollminator wrote:
Dan Kahneman wrote:
She is the best choice. Its a winning ticket.
Yep - they will be tough to beat. Harris could aggressively attack trump and I can't wait for her debate with Pence.
I'm looking forward to that one too. She's a killer prosecutor with a very sharp tongue.
Trollminator wrote:
Dan Kahneman wrote:
She is the best choice. Its a winning ticket.
Yep - they will be tough to beat. Harris could aggressively attack trump and I can't wait for her debate with Pence.
I'm no fan of Pence, but he's pretty good at what passes for debates in American politics.
I recall him showing well in 2016, though now he's far more vulnerable with a record to defend and Tim Kaine wasn't a particularly sharp opponent.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Kamala Harris unfollowed Dementia Joe on Twitter. She is butthurt & will not be on the ticket.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.thepostmillennial.com/breaking-kamala-harris-has-unfollowed-joe-biden-on-twitter-as-vp-announcement
This didn't age well.
L L wrote:
Sally does lie in a similar systematic and calculated way as Trump does.
You are CORRECT about this. You are WRONG about something else you said about Sally that I will address in a separate post.
Not sure why people believe that calling another person a dumb@ss means that that person is angry. I just speak the truth, brother. You are a dumb@ss. A persistent dumb@ss, and an a$$hole to boot. Just facts. No anger associated with those comments at all. Some people are stupid and a$$holes. You are one of those.
Sally Vix wrote:
L L wrote:
Sally does lie in a similar systematic and calculated way as Trump does.
How can I lie in a systematic and calculated way if I am outrageously stupid?
It doesn't take a rocket surgeon (yes, ROCKET SURGEON) to lie, even in a systematic and calculated way.
L L wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
How can I lie in a systematic and calculated way if I am outrageously stupid?
I never called you stupid. You have me confused with others.
I think you are a relatively smart and informed liar.
Your goal is to provide misinformation.
This is one of two posts (at least that I have seen recently) where you state that Sally is "smart". You have never been so wrong. Sally is just a moron.
Monkeys typing wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Yep - they will be tough to beat. Harris could aggressively attack trump and I can't wait for her debate with Pence.
I'm no fan of Pence, but he's pretty good at what passes for debates in American politics.
I recall him showing well in 2016, though now he's far more vulnerable with a record to defend and Tim Kaine wasn't a particularly sharp opponent.
Yeah Pence will put on an aw shucks persona - pretending to be a decent human being, and Harris will overplay her hand, appearing mean and judgmental.
Dems just aren't any good at politics. Always expect them to muck things up.
Fat Hurts is a pro-life Democrat. I know several.
So, you plagiarized this. Of course you did. Do you ever do ANYTHING that is correct or ethical?
q54u wrote:
https://www.ecowatch.com/us-coronavirus-cases-2646937010.html?rebelltitem=3#rebelltitem3Anybody else remember the H1N1 flu epidemic, early in the Obama administration? SIXTY MILLION Americans were infected in that one.
Yeah, and 12,469 deaths compared to over 160,000 now with projections to get north of 300,000. Politicization of this virus by Trump and acceptance of that by his stupid minions has caused the infection rate and thus the number of deaths to explode.
L L wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
The answer to that is 40% will support trump no matter what.
And more than 50% want Trump voted out no matter what.
The election is do you want Trump in or do you want Trump out.
And how motivated are you to vote for that result.
CORRECT! This election is a comment on Trump. Doesn't matter anything about the Democrat candidate.
Trollminator wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
NO, you attacked her because she is a conservative and a woman. You can't endure such a combination. You would never attack a liberal and a woman. They are off limits. Liberal politicians can do anything and they will never be criticized. You hate that the fact that a woman can be conservative.
That is a weird thought process and you are of course incorrect. I have attacked Katie Hill and AOC just to give you two examples.
Did you want to make a strong case for Palin? lol
CORRECT! Of course Sally is wrong again. Tulsi Gabbard is horrible, and I have said so here. We don't hate women or conservatives. I'm against stupid. Sarah Palin is flat stupid...got upset with a reporter when she was asked what books or magazines she read. Means she doesn't read. Ignorant and stupid.
q54u wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Sally is no troll. Sally is just outrageously stupid.
To the contrary, SV *is* a troll, and a rather successful one. People like you keep feeding it.
Some months back someone posted a perfect summary of SV's trolling process, including making a palpably false statement, making it again and again, finally "thanking" someone for debunking it (with material that was already posted multiple times), moving to the next falsehood, etc., etc.
You're being played. If you (and everyone else) would stop feeding the troll(s), this thread and the whole board would be better.
Nope. Sally is just an idiot. I read that summary, and it's incorrect. Sally is just an a$$hole moron.
L L wrote:
I don't think Sally stupid.
This is the second place where you said something like this (as I mentioned earlier). You have never been so wrong about something in this thread (most of the time you are right).
If Sally isn't stupid, then that word has no meaning.
losing again wrote:
agip wrote:
Well I'm glad it's Kamala. She will bring some energy and charisma to the ticket. She cost any votes, and hard for anyone to say that she is not qualified.
She's been elected in a bid diverse state and has been vetted over time.
Only downside is her lackluster presidential campaign, but she'll have a better staff now.
I'm comfortable with her leading the D party after Biden steps back.
That affirmative action trash is hated more than hillary.
Democrats lose again!!!
Wishful thinking on your part, brother. No one in politics in America (other than Trump now) is hated as much as Hillary Clinton.
agip wrote:
Monkeys typing wrote:
I'm no fan of Pence, but he's pretty good at what passes for debates in American politics.
I recall him showing well in 2016, though now he's far more vulnerable with a record to defend and Tim Kaine wasn't a particularly sharp opponent.
Yeah Pence will put on an aw shucks persona - pretending to be a decent human being, and Harris will overplay her hand, appearing mean and judgmental.
Dems just aren't any good at politics. Always expect them to muck things up.
Nah, not going happen. Pence will never debate Harris.
....because Trump will announce by this Friday that he replacing Pence with Nikki Haley as his running mate and VP nominee.