Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Best parts are the last two videos of Graham and turkey neck

https://shero.substack.com/p/everything-you-need-to-know-about?r=1ejbr&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=copy

I have no idea. Seems like a fairly straight felony to me, but I'm only trying to weigh in on things that I actually know something about.

I think this whole rally is nonsensical.

Democrats lose again!!!!

Sally Vix wrote:

How many times have we heard "game over for Trump?" 300 times? 1000 times? Wasn't it game over when Stormy Daniels appeared? Or game over when Karen McDougal showed up? Or game over when Michael Cohen went down? Or game over when (fill in the blank)__________________flipped or testified or needed to save own skin, or game over after the Yovanovich testimony, or after the etc., etc., etc.

All that proves is that the entire Republican party is complicit with whatever Trump does.

It doesn't prove what he is doing is OK or legit.

It also proves that maybe oversight to the president shouldn't fall into the hands of elected officials of the same party, or any political party.

Maybe the Supreme Court should be the judges for an impeachment without jurors.

They ares still partisan but they don't have to consider upcoming elections in their decisions.

Sally Vix wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

The longer this trial goes on for the worse off the GOP and trump are. Any curve balls will only be bad for them... there is no scenario that will somehow prove the Dems wrong in their claims. If witnesses come into play it may be game over for trump and GOP majority in Nov.

How many times have we heard "game over for Trump?" 300 times? 1000 times? Wasn't it game over when Stormy Daniels appeared? Or game over when Karen McDougal showed up? Or game over when Michael Cohen went down? Or game over when (fill in the blank)__________________flipped or testified or needed to save own skin, or game over after the Yovanovich testimony, or after the etc., etc., etc.

All that shows is how corrupt Republicans are and how stupid Trumpers like you are. Logic says that many of those things should have been the end of any President. Precedence says it too. What Trump has done is far worse than what Nixon did, and yet not one Republican yet in the Senate will say what he did is too much, too far. Sickening, and Republicans will pay the price long term for going along with this corrupt President.

jesseriley wrote:

Blah, blah, blah. I’m glad you agree that votes of the senators will determine it, even though it took you so long to say it.

Jesse, my bad. I forgot that you are not much of a reader.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

About the same number of times you have been called outrageously stupid.

Pretty good. That should be game, set and match for Sally, but she'll keep it coming.

1993 the Houston Oilers were up on the Bills 35-3. Pretty much game, set and match. But the Bills ended up winning the game 41-3.

Your plan would not work at all. How would the impeachment ever get to the Supreme Court if the oversight authority of the executive is taken away from Congress? Would the Supreme Court decide to impeach the president AND THEN try him? The Supreme Court is every bit as partisan and Congress and whichever party controls the Supreme Court could then run roughshod over the president.

Sally Vix wrote:

1993 the Houston Oilers were up on the Bills 35-3. Pretty much game, set and match. But the Bills ended up winning the game 41-3.

I remember that game. Frank Reich QBed the Bills while Jim Kelly was hurt.

But I don't remember them subtracting 32 points from the Oilers at game's end.

great read from the great Rick Wilson.

His view is that Ds should sorrta welcome Mitch's coverup during the trial...that down the road Bolton will confirm the D story. Trump and Mitch won't help them, and right wing voters will actually hold this agaisnt right wing senators. This guy's view is that right wing votes can be depended on to vote agaisnt corruption.

I'm not so sure, but wilosn has been working with the Repubs for decades getting them to vote one way or the other...he knows them better than I do.

https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson/status/1219660314267897856?s=20

agip wrote:

great read from the great Rick Wilson.

His view is that Ds should sorrta welcome Mitch's coverup during the trial...that down the road Bolton will confirm the D story. Trump and Mitch won't help them, and right wing voters will actually hold this agaisnt right wing senators. This guy's view is that right wing votes can be depended on to vote agaisnt corruption.

I'm not so sure, but wilosn has been working with the Repubs for decades getting them to vote one way or the other...he knows them better than I do.

https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson/status/1219660314267897856?s=20

But what to do about the issue of trump controlling headlines? Rs think he’s clean and Dems are just full of envy.

agip wrote:

great read from the great Rick Wilson.

His view is that Ds should sorrta welcome Mitch's coverup during the trial...that down the road Bolton will confirm the D story. Trump and Mitch won't help them, and right wing voters will actually hold this agaisnt right wing senators. This guy's view is that right wing votes can be depended on to vote agaisnt corruption.

I'm not so sure, but wilosn has been working with the Repubs for decades getting them to vote one way or the other...he knows them better than I do.

https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson/status/1219660314267897856?s=20

Rick Wilson is also the one who has been saying that Bernie Sanders could never win a general election against Trump. His arguments why he could never win are also pretty persuasive.

from Virgiinia wrote:

I have no idea. Seems like a fairly straight felony to me, but I'm only trying to weigh in on things that I actually know something about.

I think this whole rally is nonsensical.

The people at the "rally" had no idea what they were "rallying" about. Virginia wants to ban military-style assault weapons. You know, the type the kill a lot of people in a short time ... before people can run for cover; getting out of the way before a shooter has to reload.

The "ban" include a grandfather clause. People who already own assault weapons CAN KEEP THEM as long as they register their weapons before the end of a designated grace period.

Previously banned assault weapons include machine guns, and sawed-off shotguns. The only new banned is something that managed to get around the previous rules. A gun know as a "streetsweeper," which is a 12-gauge shotgun with a revolving cylinder that was designed for riot control and combat, and carry either 12, 20 or 30 rounds. This is essentially a machine gun. And below is a video of guy showing how it works.

Trollminator wrote:

agip wrote:

great read from the great Rick Wilson.

His view is that Ds should sorrta welcome Mitch's coverup during the trial...that down the road Bolton will confirm the D story. Trump and Mitch won't help them, and right wing voters will actually hold this agaisnt right wing senators. This guy's view is that right wing votes can be depended on to vote agaisnt corruption.

I'm not so sure, but wilosn has been working with the Repubs for decades getting them to vote one way or the other...he knows them better than I do.

https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson/status/1219660314267897856?s=20

But what to do about the issue of trump controlling headlines? Rs think he’s clean and Dems are just full of envy.

the idea is that more facts will come out down the road, especially Bolton's book, and if the Dems have any political skill whatsoever, they will be able to use that news to pry away the women in the suburbs.

Sure, magas will never change their votes. But Dems can win without those guys.

agip wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

But what to do about the issue of trump controlling headlines? Rs think he’s clean and Dems are just full of envy.

the idea is that more facts will come out down the road, especially Bolton's book, and if the Dems have any political skill whatsoever, they will be able to use that news to pry away the women in the suburbs.

Sure, magas will never change their votes. But Dems can win without those guys.

but it's also an act of political ju-jutsu. Letting mitch walk the R party off the cliff is pretty appealing. I mean even after a fair trial trump would never be fired anyway. So might as well let the Rs hang themselves.

And Wilson's ideas will get me through the next two weeks of mitchian excess without as much agippian suffering.

Sally Vix wrote:

... my bad. I forgot that you are not much of a reader.

You obviously meant Trump, who does not read anything.

I actually enjoyed reading about sally’s escape-the-FBI plan when trump was going to war with Iran. “They’ll never take me alive!”

She only writes well in full panic mode.

L L wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

1993 the Houston Oilers were up on the Bills 35-3. Pretty much game, set and match. But the Bills ended up winning the game 41-3.

I remember that game. Frank Reich QBed the Bills while Jim Kelly was hurt.

But I don't remember them subtracting 32 points from the Oilers at game's end.

Sally can't even get that right.

Smorbun wrote:

L L wrote:

I remember that game. Frank Reich QBed the Bills while Jim Kelly was hurt.

But I don't remember them subtracting 32 points from the Oilers at game's end.

Sally can't even get that right.

41-38 was final score. Typo.