Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Ah, yes, another lecture on the law from a traitor!

Reality calling wrote:

Sally, of the three is most grounded in reality. Sally is not a true believer, he did not drink from Trump's steady in diet of Trump kool aid. Sure he trolls, all three of them do, and he likes to mix it up with the libs just to annoy them but he is not a true believer.

Sally is clearly not grounded in reality.

Sally believes that scientists all over the world are participating in a global conspiracy on climate change. He can't explain how this is possible, but he still believes it.

Sally also believes that he understands climate science better than the scientists themselves. Therefore, this accountant is able to draw different conclusions from everyone who is a practicing climate scientist.

Both of these beliefs require a manufactured reality that does not exist in the real world.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Reality calling wrote:

Iggy you are deluding yourself. None of the people you mentioned lie pathologically to the degree of trump. You know he is lying to you because none of us in reality believe him and he knows that. Do you not know that? That is the reality that you are denying! Yes lets remove him at the ballot box but the house and the senate also need to do their jobs and remove a president who breaks the law and the constitution.

If congress didn't impeach they would be remiss in fulfilling their sworn duty.

You though are supporting a process that is a sham. A true impeachment inquiry would be above the board and not conducted as this one is. The House Democratic leadership is not above the law either.

What the hell are you talking about? This impeachment inquiry is completely above board and legal. The House has been more than fair. What is it you incorrectly believe House leadership is doing illegally? You are wrong, dude.

"Above the board" and "above the law"???

What laws are Dems breaking at the moment? You do know that it was the GOP that is responsible for Dems not needed to put a vote on impeachment proceedings right? It is 100% certifiably legal much to your or anyone else's disliking. And you know exactly what would happen if Dems didn't grow a spine and do it this way - the GOP would undermine their authority and trump would be harassing and tampering. This way, we know we have limited trump meddling. And don't start with the fairness bs, there are GOP members on these committees so it's absurd to cry foul. You would never be satisfied with any way they do it. Trump gave them a more than valid reason to try to impeach, sorry that his lawlessness bothers you so much.

a) people who equate Trump's open corruption and unfitness to serve with HRC, Biden, Booker and Sanders is just not paying attention.

b) the reason to impeach is to warn future presidents that congress will not put up with corruption, abuse of the public trust, self dealing, felonies and asking foreign nations to help with your campaign.

Pretty simple.

Fat hurts wrote:

Reality calling wrote:

Sally, of the three is most grounded in reality. Sally is not a true believer, he did not drink from Trump's steady in diet of Trump kool aid. Sure he trolls, all three of them do, and he likes to mix it up with the libs just to annoy them but he is not a true believer.

Sally is clearly not grounded in reality.

Sally believes that scientists all over the world are participating in a global conspiracy on climate change. He can't explain how this is possible, but he still believes it.

Sally also believes that he understands climate science better than the scientists themselves. Therefore, this accountant is able to draw different conclusions from everyone who is a practicing climate scientist.

Both of these beliefs require a manufactured reality that does not exist in the real world.

Yet, NOT ONE Global Warming alarmist here will answer this one question. No one have ever answered this because if they do answer truthfully Global Warming is shot down.

Fat Hurts and everyone else ... here is the question. Don't be cowardly. Just answer truthfully ... Is the Earth going to keep warming and warming and warming until everyone on Earth perishes? Or, will the Earth in the not-too-distant future transition into a cooling phase and all the Global Warming hysteria will be forever over? Please answer that one easy question. The former or the latter ...

Shut up troll - no one cares

This is what I call a "Triple A (AAA)" question. Asked And Answered. You just don't like the answer Fat Hurts gave you. Move on to another topic, brother.

Night Observer,

Is this Presidential? I say no.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/21/politics/mitt-romney-pierre-delecto-twitter-account/index.html

Flagpole wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Yet, NOT ONE Global Warming alarmist here will answer this one question. No one have ever answered this because if they do answer truthfully Global Warming is shot down.

Fat Hurts and everyone else ... here is the question. Don't be cowardly. Just answer truthfully ... Is the Earth going to keep warming and warming and warming until everyone on Earth perishes? Or, will the Earth in the not-too-distant future transition into a cooling phase and all the Global Warming hysteria will be forever over? Please answer that one easy question. The former or the latter ...

This is what I call a "Triple A (AAA)" question. Asked And Answered. You just don't like the answer Fat Hurts gave you. Move on to another topic, brother.

It HAS NOT been answered. If it has please tell me again what the answer was, Flagpole. You can repeat your caveats and everything else so just remind me what the answer was. It HAS NOT been answered because no one here has the BALLS to be honest and answer truthfully. Just a little bitty question. It is not going to bite you.

Shut up troll

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

This is what I call a "Triple A (AAA)" question. Asked And Answered. You just don't like the answer Fat Hurts gave you. Move on to another topic, brother.

It HAS NOT been answered. If it has please tell me again what the answer was, Flagpole. You can repeat your caveats and everything else so just remind me what the answer was. It HAS NOT been answered because no one here has the BALLS to be honest and answer truthfully. Just a little bitty question. It is not going to bite you.

sally is it your point that it's ok to melt the icecaps for 5000 years and lose virtually every current coastline in the world... because eventually there will probably be another ice age?

Is that what you are getting at?

agip wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

It HAS NOT been answered. If it has please tell me again what the answer was, Flagpole. You can repeat your caveats and everything else so just remind me what the answer was. It HAS NOT been answered because no one here has the BALLS to be honest and answer truthfully. Just a little bitty question. It is not going to bite you.

sally is it your point that it's ok to melt the icecaps for 5000 years and lose virtually every current coastline in the world... because eventually there will probably be another ice age?

Is that what you are getting at?

Not my point at all. I think the widespread Global Warming hysteria today is unwarranted. The Earth was warmer during Roman times and the Middle Ages. How come when Global Alarmists shout out that this year "Fill in the most current year" is the warmest "on record" do they never mention that "on record" only goes back to 1880 when the Earth is 4.6 Billion years and that other times in history the Earth was warmer. Why do the not mention these things? Because they are not forthcoming about the history of the Earth in regard to Temps and climate. They want to scare everyone (The Earth is falling!!!) and that is why no one on here will mention that the Earth goes through warming and cooling trends and it is very likely the Earth will cool relatively soon. No one will admit that!

Back in the ol days, trolls at least knew when their tired act was overplayed and moved on to a different persona or topic. This is just getting kind of sad at this point.

No one is man enough especially you Raquet to address any of my points.

Sally Vix wrote:

Racket wrote:

Back in the ol days, trolls at least knew when their tired act was overplayed and moved on to a different persona or topic. This is just getting kind of sad at this point.

No one is man enough especially you Raquet to address any of my points.

ok well never mind. Clearly you don't trust science and data and knowledge and experts. Better to go with your gut, right?

agip wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

No one is man enough especially you Raquet to address any of my points.

ok well never mind. Clearly you don't trust science and data and knowledge and experts. Better to go with your gut, right?

I don't trust the "experts." They are continually wrong and have been found manipulating data because that data didn't support the "narrative." Would you trust those "experts?" I think it is only logical NOT to trust them.