Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Conundrum wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

JOe Biden BRAGGED at how he got the prosecutor fired. How simple is that?

You are changing the goal posts here. In your last statement you correctly left out the reference to the Bidens. Your last statement is simply correct the way is was stated.

"The absolutely the worst thing you can do to a troll, is ignore them. They hate that. Their whole purpose of being is to get a reaction. Once a troll has been demonstrated to purposely lie and link to false information they become a waste of time." - Conundrum

Sally Vix wrote:

No I don't. I think he should have his minions testify. In a normal time, I would be outraged. But what you Liberals have turned everything on its head. You have been pursuing him for 3 years. You want to overturn the 2016 election. He was duly elected but you will never let that sink in. He WAS duly elected. You don't care about that. It is YOU who is doing wrong.

The 2018 election was about reigning in Trump's excesses. Why do you want to overturn the 2018 election?

Why does anyone waste their time replying to Sally?

Ignore, it’ll drive him mad.

Why do you hate democracy? wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

No I don't. I think he should have his minions testify. In a normal time, I would be outraged. But what you Liberals have turned everything on its head. You have been pursuing him for 3 years. You want to overturn the 2016 election. He was duly elected but you will never let that sink in. He WAS duly elected. You don't care about that. It is YOU who is doing wrong.

The 2018 election was about reigning in Trump's excesses. Why do you want to overturn the 2018 election?

The 2018 election re-established the Republican majority in the Senate. Why do you ignore that? But you have a good point, will give you that.

The latest talking point is just denying that the impeachment inquiry exists. Although ignorance of the Constitution is profound among trumpettes, impeachment is pretty well known. It still carries weight, especially within government. The tidal wave of witnesses has just started.

jesseriley wrote:

The latest talking point is just denying that the impeachment inquiry exists. Although ignorance of the Constitution is profound among trumpettes, impeachment is pretty well known. It still carries weight, especially within government. The tidal wave of witnesses has just started.

The "tidal" wave of witnesses has just started? Name 3 witnesses. Thanks!

Sally Vix wrote:

Conundrum wrote:

Do you belief Trump is right in the way he has fought impeachment.

Is it right for him to declare executive privilege:

To prevent himself from testifying,

To prevent others who are witnesses from testifying

To prevent documents from being released.

If you think this is ok, you are basically saying the a president could never be impeached. He could always block any needed to impeach him.evidence.

Sad interpretation of our constitution.

No I don't. I think he should have his minions testify. In a normal time, I would be outraged. But what you Liberals have turned everything on its head. You have been pursuing him for 3 years. You want to overturn the 2016 election. He was duly elected but you will never let that sink in. He WAS duly elected. You don't care about that. It is YOU who is doing wrong.

And Nixon was duly elected in the 1972...

jesseriley wrote:

The latest talking point is just denying that the impeachment inquiry exists. Although ignorance of the Constitution is profound among trumpettes, impeachment is pretty well known. It still carries weight, especially within government. The tidal wave of witnesses has just started.

Do you know what "inquiry" means? It is the process for "asking for information." Do you understand the impotency of that? Asking for information? Trump committed multiple acts of impeachment and the Dems in the House are 'asking" for information? What happens if those they are asking refuse to provide that information? The askers are rebuffed. What do the "askers" do then? Beg for information? LOL.

foo wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

No I don't. I think he should have his minions testify. In a normal time, I would be outraged. But what you Liberals have turned everything on its head. You have been pursuing him for 3 years. You want to overturn the 2016 election. He was duly elected but you will never let that sink in. He WAS duly elected. You don't care about that. It is YOU who is doing wrong.

And Nixon was duly elected in the 1972...

Nixon never faced an impeachment "inquiry." LOL.

Sally Vix wrote:

Conundrum wrote:

Do you belief Trump is right in the way he has fought impeachment.

Is it right for him to declare executive privilege:

To prevent himself from testifying,

To prevent others who are witnesses from testifying

To prevent documents from being released.

If you think this is ok, you are basically saying the a president could never be impeached. He could always block any needed to impeach him.evidence.

Sad interpretation of our constitution.

No I don't. I think he should have his minions testify. In a normal time, I would be outraged. But what you Liberals have turned everything on its head. You have been pursuing him for 3 years. You want to overturn the 2016 election. He was duly elected but you will never let that sink in. He WAS duly elected. You don't care about that. It is YOU who is doing wrong.

Nope, none of what you state overturns trump’s criminality. Maybe it’s best you to back to attacking Biden.

Nothing better than watching hillary lovers continue to have meltdowns!!!

Bring it you, democrat pieces of trash!!!

You want civil war??? You got it and you will be destroyed!!!

Thanks for the civics lesson, Maria Butina.

Witnesses include everyone that Mueller convicted (way more than 3, babuschka). Stone hasn’t been tried yet.

DatDude wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

No I don't. I think he should have his minions testify. In a normal time, I would be outraged. But what you Liberals have turned everything on its head. You have been pursuing him for 3 years. You want to overturn the 2016 election. He was duly elected but you will never let that sink in. He WAS duly elected. You don't care about that. It is YOU who is doing wrong.

Nope, none of what you state overturns trump’s criminality. Maybe it’s best you to back to attacking Biden.

Please ignore Sally, he’s trolling.

It’s like talking to a wall and the conversation goes in circles and he just shifts the goal posts when cornered.

Can’t believe anyone still engages him.

Fat hurts wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

This is correct:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/07/opinions/donald-trump-should-resign-ghitis/index.html

I wrote that almost verbatim a year ago based on the facts of the time.

He will never resign.

He might not, but it's probably his best option. He should make a deal.

Flagpole wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

He will never resign.

He might not, but it's probably his best option. He should make a deal.

Huh? Why would it be his best option? He is president of the greatest nation in the world. Why would resigning be his best option? You have continually said that he is open to criminal prosecution when he is no longer president. Why oh why would resigning be his best option? Please clarify Flagpole because that was not a very smart thing to say.. He can continue to be president OR he can resign and face criminal prosecution. Yet you say resigning is his best option? Please elaborate.

Sally Vix wrote:

Rayquon Jones wrote:

Question:

Let’s say my babymomma was about to get evicted. She then calls me to say she needs a stack(that’s $1,000 for the white folks out there). I say sure........but I “need you to do me a favor though”. I say I want her to come by and swallow the anaconda.

Would that be whats called a quid pro quo???

If so, how is that different than what Trump did?

Presidential candidate Joe Biden bragged at how he was able to fire the special prosecutor of his son, Hunter. Extortion 101. I am not a lawyer but that seems Extortion 101 and he will never be president.

Sally, you have been told several times about how you are not right in your assessment of this. You look more and more foolish every time you bring it up. There is no debate on this. You are just flat wrong.

Flagpole wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Presidential candidate Joe Biden bragged at how he was able to fire the special prosecutor of his son, Hunter. Extortion 101. I am not a lawyer but that seems Extortion 101 and he will never be president.

Sally, you have been told several times about how you are not right in your assessment of this. You look more and more foolish every time you bring it up. There is no debate on this. You are just flat wrong.

The foolish one is you wasting your time on Sally.

Deprive him of the attention he craves.

Witnesses, since you asked, include Mueller himself, his whole team, and everyone who cooperated. Hundreds, at least.

Advantages to resigning/making a deal include retaining pension/presidential perks. It saves time as well, trump isn’t young or healthy in case you missed it.

Flagpole wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Presidential candidate Joe Biden bragged at how he was able to fire the special prosecutor of his son, Hunter. Extortion 101. I am not a lawyer but that seems Extortion 101 and he will never be president.

Sally, you have been told several times about how you are not right in your assessment of this. You look more and more foolish every time you bring it up. There is no debate on this. You are just flat wrong.