Sally - let me try to dumb this down as much as possible. Consider the following scenarios:
A) I state on this thread that I am worth $100M. It's safe to say you won't believe me just by reading that. (there would be something wrong with you if you did btw)
B) I state on this thread that I am worth $100M. Then during a visit to Manhattan or in a news segment, you see me driving up 5th Ave in a Lambo. You might easily believe my statement then.
If you bother to do some research on his life, you will find that a similar technique as in B) has been used by him over and over. In fact, he is a walking advertisement of the supposed wealth he has. Now of course all I did in B) is spend a couple of thousand dollars to rent a Lambo over a weekend to show off and pretend to be rich. The difference is he has been doing this on a much bigger scale his whole life AND he got a head start with millions from daddy. He has his name posted on buildings, most of which are not owned by him. He can land somewhere in his trump branded helicopter and have paid security guards waiting his arrival to lead him to an expensive limo. He can pay people to show up to rallies and pump up the crowd. He has relatively cheap and effective weapons at his disposal to con to his heart's desire. All this has led to him making more money and thus in his mind validating his reckless and unethical strategies.
Now you might say well he's no different than other rich guys then but I don't question them. My response is 1) most people who have tremendous wealth do not feel the need to advertise it and 2) We have seen tangible evidence of what others are worth (e.g. Bill Gates' ownership stake in MS) and Mitt Romney's tax returns and audited financial records proving he has a couple hundred million), but has has done everything to keep his financial position hidden. You should be questioning why - that's a huge red flag.
So the question is how do you respond to scenario B)? I don't blame you for falling for it, most would, but if you've seen the trick enough times you would do well to be more cynical. He is a known chronic liar and con artist. I really don't understand why you would give him any benefit of the doubt. And to believe he means only to do well as the POTUS when he's legally above so many laws is kind of insane no?