P wrote:
So, you are doubling down on stupid, are you?
^ Such immaturity.
P wrote:
So, you are doubling down on stupid, are you?
^ Such immaturity.
P wrote:
Roe-v-Wade wrote:
You just just plain stupid. The GOP bill ONLY provided for JAIL TIME for doctors in the very limited number of abortions where the fetus had a heartbeat, no matter how faint, weak or unstable.
Have you signed up for the Sally Pledge to adopted as many of those fetuses as possible, AND pay for their care entirely on you won? Of course you have NO intention of ever doing so. It is someone else's problem which you want to meddle in.
So, you are doubling down on stupid, are you?
Once again, the wonderfulness of Sally or me (or any other individual that you might want to name) has nothing whatsoever to do with the rightness of the bill in question.
Now, you might think that the bill in question is basically nonsense (this is the CORRECT position to take, by the way). Or you may think that protecting women's rights to abortion is extremely important. Or you may think any number of other things. But your stance on any issue and/or any bill does not give you carte blanche to go into full bore moron mode.
Try defending your positions using logic rather than stupidity.
Here, let me try helping you out a bit more.
Assuming that you have a non-zero IQ, you should be capable of simple thought experiments, no? Well, you clearly are suggesting that the bill in question is not a good idea and you are backing up that notion with the accusation that Sally (or I) has/have not adopted a bunch of fetuses.
So, the obvious thought experiment is this: Suppose that Sally has indeed adopted 17 babies whose parents did not want them. Would the bill in question suddenly have more merit? Of course not. That fact would have ZERO impact on the wisdom of the bill. Likewise, presuming Sally to have not adopted any unwanted babies has exactly ZERO impact on the wisdom of the bill.
Try to think logically, not stupidly.
And you're welcome.
University System wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
okay here is another rankings system - UT is 22 in the nation and 31 IN THE WORLD. Nothing wrong with me. UT Austin a very great university. Second richest (or maybe third) university in the country.
Foolish Sally. UT is a system if NINE schools. Dived by NINE before comparing them to other singular schools.
https://thebestschools.org/features/richest-universities-endowments-generosity-research/
Quite apparent that you are not a Rhodes Scholar.
rayyyyyyyyycist!!!
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1152307567634391041?s=21
P wrote:
P wrote:
So, you are doubling down on stupid, are you?
Once again, the wonderfulness of Sally or me (or any other individual that you might want to name) has nothing whatsoever to do with the rightness of the bill in question.
Now, you might think that the bill in question is basically nonsense (this is the CORRECT position to take, by the way). Or you may think that protecting women's rights to abortion is extremely important. Or you may think any number of other things. But your stance on any issue and/or any bill does not give you carte blanche to go into full bore moron mode.
Try defending your positions using logic rather than stupidity.
Here, let me try helping you out a bit more.
Assuming that you have a non-zero IQ, you should be capable of simple thought experiments, no? Well, you clearly are suggesting that the bill in question is not a good idea and you are backing up that notion with the accusation that Sally (or I) has/have not adopted a bunch of fetuses.
So, the obvious thought experiment is this: Suppose that Sally has indeed adopted 17 babies whose parents did not want them. Would the bill in question suddenly have more merit? Of course not. That fact would have ZERO impact on the wisdom of the bill. Likewise, presuming Sally to have not adopted any unwanted babies has exactly ZERO impact on the wisdom of the bill.
Try to think logically, not stupidly.
And you're welcome.
Awwwww. Frowny face.
No racist bone wrote:
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/07/16/politics/white-supremacists-cheer-trump-racist-tweets-soh/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F
Blacks are wearing M-AGA hats. And the libs of LR are in shock. The dems keep playing Project "Race Card" and losing.
Trump wins again!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1152191081313918977Be afraid dems, be very afraid!
#BlacksForTrump2020
KAG2020
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/sub-mrz071019-color-1-5-mb_orig.jpg?itok=qYaTlPw3semsur wrote:
Wow... you morons just spent like 4 pages arguing over whether or not AOC is intelligent?
Her intelligence is irrelevant. Her alma mater is irrelevant. She and the rest of 'The Squad' are unpopular, the "Green New Deal" is a joke, and these ladies will likely be voted out in 2020.
That's all you need to know. Stop wasting time bickering like children over things that have no relevance.
“Clueless about history” - remind me what Trump said on the Fourth of July about the airports?
See you’re okay with second rate politicians so long as they’re your guy.
I posted a political cartoon and you of course jump to all kinds of conclusions.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
I posted a political cartoon and you of course jump to all kinds of conclusions.
Yeah, I know, right? There is no way that anyone can justify labeling you a Trumpette with all of the balanced and thoughtful posting that you do.
Shameful!
Where have I gone wrong Ghost?
I’m happy to stand corrected if you offer something reasonable, ample evidence on this thread to suggest you support Trump. Am I wrong?
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
US News is the one most people look at for undergraduate rankings. It's not a good tool to decide where to attend, but it's what most people are talking about when they discuss college rank.
I still don't think you got into UT Austin.
You have problems with the english language, you have no idea how to use the past passive, you think there are 100s of schools worldwide that are ranked higher than UT Austin, and you are saying you don't think I got into UT when I had a 3.99 GPA. Seriously, dude?
Yes, seriously. I don't think you had a high GPA either. Your reasoning skills would be much better if you were a good student.
Ciro wrote:
Where have I gone wrong Ghost?
I’m happy to stand corrected if you offer something reasonable, ample evidence on this thread to suggest you support Trump. Am I wrong?
Point one, the discussion was on AOC’s academic credentials and intelligence. Point two, I am free to support whomever I choose, something you seem to forget, it is a free country. Last point(s), AOC and the “Squad” are making it very hard for the Democratic Party to counter Trump. I am sure she (and the “Squad”) is/are very smart, but also politically naive and more than a little obnoxious.
Lets get back to politics, my thoughts on where we are right now.
I think the Democrats certainly have the edge in 2020 but the Democrats can easily lose in 2020 too. The election will probably come down to the swing states of Wisconsin, Pennsylvania , Ohio and Florida. Telling someone who was born in the United States to go back where you came from whether directed at a black, Asian or Muslim is a very bigoted and racist thing to say. But additionally calling or being shocked by Trump saying this is nothing new and will not change his popularity. Some movement with borderlines may occur but the effect of comments like this are forgotten in a couple weeks. It will not help Democrats in 2020. Polls show Trump's strength in the South is stronger than it has ever been.
Trump is very good politically for Omar and the self named "squad". A vicious attack by Trump on a young minority makes them the darling of the Democrat party. Omar and the squad are suddenly getting more coverage than the Democratic candidates . Omar is very radical and out of step with the Democratic party. Her support of BDS is amazingly one sided and against our ally Israel. Omar was a nobody until Trump helped her by attacking her. The squad is a very appealing and media attention drawing group. This is bad for the Democratic party.
The economy is not as robust as Trump pretends it to be. The job growth for Obama's last two years were stronger than Trump's first two years. The national debt has exploded (and it didn't need to) and many economist think we are basically on a sugar high right now. The advantage has not been evenly spread.
On the international level things are falling apart and we are not respected. There has been no consistent policy.
Moving to the left is a losing platform for Democrats. The self identified social democrats is a losing branding for the democrat party. (polls have indicated this). Threatening to take away private insurance is a losing platform, adding a public option is a winning platform. Open borders, free college, reparations for slavery, minimal income for everyone, erasing all student loans are all ideas that will lose in the general election.
Trump is an amazingly unpopular president but don't for a minute think this election is an easy win for Democrats.
Republicans are afraid to hold Trump accountable because of the price they will have to pay if they do this. Trump has been doing every thing he can to consolidate power and be above the law. Trump is dangerous to our democracy, its really important for the Democrats to win in 2020. Let's not blow it.
Conundrum wrote:
Lets get back to politics, my thoughts on where we are right now.
I think the Democrats certainly have the edge in 2020 but the Democrats can easily lose in 2020 too. The election will probably come down to the swing states of Wisconsin, Pennsylvania , Ohio and Florida. Telling someone who was born in the United States to go back where you came from whether directed at a black, Asian or Muslim is a very bigoted and racist thing to say. But additionally calling or being shocked by Trump saying this is nothing new and will not change his popularity. Some movement with borderlines may occur but the effect of comments like this are forgotten in a couple weeks. It will not help Democrats in 2020. Polls show Trump's strength in the South is stronger than it has ever been.
Trump is very good politically for Omar and the self named "squad". A vicious attack by Trump on a young minority makes them the darling of the Democrat party. Omar and the squad are suddenly getting more coverage than the Democratic candidates . Omar is very radical and out of step with the Democratic party. Her support of BDS is amazingly one sided and against our ally Israel. Omar was a nobody until Trump helped her by attacking her. The squad is a very appealing and media attention drawing group. This is bad for the Democratic party.
The economy is not as robust as Trump pretends it to be. The job growth for Obama's last two years were stronger than Trump's first two years. The national debt has exploded (and it didn't need to) and many economist think we are basically on a sugar high right now. The advantage has not been evenly spread.
On the international level things are falling apart and we are not respected. There has been no consistent policy.
Moving to the left is a losing platform for Democrats. The self identified social democrats is a losing branding for the democrat party. (polls have indicated this). Threatening to take away private insurance is a losing platform, adding a public option is a winning platform. Open borders, free college, reparations for slavery, minimal income for everyone, erasing all student loans are all ideas that will lose in the general election.
Trump is an amazingly unpopular president but don't for a minute think this election is an easy win for Democrats.
Republicans are afraid to hold Trump accountable because of the price they will have to pay if they do this. Trump has been doing every thing he can to consolidate power and be above the law. Trump is dangerous to our democracy, its really important for the Democrats to win in 2020. Let's not blow it.
You Dems keep saying no one, not even the president is above the law. So my question is how come illegals are?
I’ll wait.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Ciro wrote:
Where have I gone wrong Ghost?
I’m happy to stand corrected if you offer something reasonable, ample evidence on this thread to suggest you support Trump. Am I wrong?
Point one, the discussion was on AOC’s academic credentials and intelligence. Point two, I am free to support whomever I choose, something you seem to forget, it is a free country. Last point(s), AOC and the “Squad” are making it very hard for the Democratic Party to counter Trump. I am sure she (and the “Squad”) is/are very smart, but also politically naive and more than a little obnoxious.
Point one, this thread is about politics and in particular Donald Trump.
Where have I ever suggested you are not free to support whoever you want? You’re much smarter than this. You’re deflecting, I pointed out a glaring irony on the Donald Trump thread and you’ve had a little tantrum. BTW I’m not a fan of the squad, although if obnoxiousness isn’t your thing, then surely you’ll concede that Trumps race tinged attacks on them are unhelpful. Best wishes.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Conundrum wrote:
Lets get back to politics, my thoughts on where we are right now.
I think the Democrats certainly have the edge in 2020 but the Democrats can easily lose in 2020 too. The election will probably come down to the swing states of Wisconsin, Pennsylvania , Ohio and Florida. Telling someone who was born in the United States to go back where you came from whether directed at a black, Asian or Muslim is a very bigoted and racist thing to say. But additionally calling or being shocked by Trump saying this is nothing new and will not change his popularity. Some movement with borderlines may occur but the effect of comments like this are forgotten in a couple weeks. It will not help Democrats in 2020. Polls show Trump's strength in the South is stronger than it has ever been.
Trump is very good politically for Omar and the self named "squad". A vicious attack by Trump on a young minority makes them the darling of the Democrat party. Omar and the squad are suddenly getting more coverage than the Democratic candidates . Omar is very radical and out of step with the Democratic party. Her support of BDS is amazingly one sided and against our ally Israel. Omar was a nobody until Trump helped her by attacking her. The squad is a very appealing and media attention drawing group. This is bad for the Democratic party.
The economy is not as robust as Trump pretends it to be. The job growth for Obama's last two years were stronger than Trump's first two years. The national debt has exploded (and it didn't need to) and many economist think we are basically on a sugar high right now. The advantage has not been evenly spread.
On the international level things are falling apart and we are not respected. There has been no consistent policy.
Moving to the left is a losing platform for Democrats. The self identified social democrats is a losing branding for the democrat party. (polls have indicated this). Threatening to take away private insurance is a losing platform, adding a public option is a winning platform. Open borders, free college, reparations for slavery, minimal income for everyone, erasing all student loans are all ideas that will lose in the general election.
Trump is an amazingly unpopular president but don't for a minute think this election is an easy win for Democrats.
Republicans are afraid to hold Trump accountable because of the price they will have to pay if they do this. Trump has been doing every thing he can to consolidate power and be above the law. Trump is dangerous to our democracy, its really important for the Democrats to win in 2020. Let's not blow it.
You Dems keep saying no one, not even the president is above the law. So my question is how come illegals are?
I’ll wait.
1) People who are in this country illegally are not above the law.
2) The term "illegals" is moronic. I am certain that you have taken illegal actions. Are you an illegal?
Do you have anything intelligent to say?
I'll wait.
Bad Engrish wrote:
Quite apparent that you are not a Rhodes Scholar.
^ An example of an incomplete sentence.
They call them illegals to imply they’re not human. This is your trumper.
semsur wrote:
Wow... you morons just spent like 4 pages arguing over whether or not AOC is intelligent?
Her intelligence is irrelevant. Her alma mater is irrelevant. She and the rest of 'The Squad' are unpopular, the "Green New Deal" is a joke, and these ladies will likely be voted out in 2020.
That's all you need to know. Stop wasting time bickering like children over things that have no relevance.
They have been in Congress since the 3rd week of January 2019 and are extremely popular. Who is your rep in Congress? You probably don't even know and I bet they don't do a damn thing. LOL....you called them unpopular.
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!
