Sorry, you're wrong. But thats OK.
Sorry, you're wrong. But thats OK.
TransparentCorruption wrote:
Trump supports corrupt regimes, eg Russia and Saudi Arabia, because they line his pockets and the pockets of the people he cares about. I don’t support the Democrats, but I can’t support someone so blatently un-American. I guess some might say that acting in the interest of greed over all else is American. I don’t agree.
If you don’t vote Democratic than you are complicit. I am a socialist, and thus I detest the Democrats,, but not nearly as much as the Republicans. It is insanity not to support the lesser of two evils.
proves it wrote:
Not quite. wrote:
Only that she IS Native American. Her DNA test PROVED it.
What actually proved it was Trump screaming he would pay $1,000,000 if she had any Native American blood. Then the DNA test. Then Trump screaming, "who cares?" Then Trump claiming he has to do the DNA test himself because, "junk science."
Elizabeth Warren proved it.
Trump cannot handle the truth.
You do realize that Warren's *most recent* DNA test reveal was a MASSIVE flop though, right? Between 1/64 and 1/1024 is laughable to CLAIM THAT AS YOUR IDENTITY ON A JOB APPLICATION.
The Cherokee Nation has told her to stop. A descendant of Pocahontas herself as told her to stop.
The anti-Trump crew over at CNN has written a few pieces now on how badly it backfired. By the next day, "Elizabeth Warren" wasn't even on their front page anymore. It was supposed to be a massive blow to Trump. But by the end of the day he was STILL calling her Pocahontas on Twitter, because she's about as much "Native American" as the rest of us.
Warren lost. Bigly.
Actually..... wrote:
Racket wrote:
There's literally a Wikipedia page on it :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_approval_ratingOh were you unable to infer we were talking about average approval ratings and not current ones? Yeah lack of inference and inability to deduce is pretty common with you guys.
(Oh my god, what a moran...)
Oh I'm sorry, were YOU unable to infer that we aren't just using one polling source (Wikipedia only uses Gallup), as that would be quite dumb when it has been proven that a poll of polls is much more accurate? Hey, why not use the Rasmussen poll for the Wikipedia page?
Yeah, but you know, lack of applying basic logic to figure things out is pretty common with you guys.
Uh oh- don't look now- but 4 poll updates just came in, and none of them were lower than 45%.
Trump is now sitting at 44.3%.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.htmlRCP Average 10/1 - 10/16 -- 44.3
FOX News 10/13 - 10/16 841 LV 47
Economist/YouGov 10/14 - 10/16 1273 RV 45
Rasmussen Reports 10/14 - 10/16 1500 LV 49
Reuters/Ipsos 10/10 - 10/16 1194 LV 45
Gallup 10/8 - 10/14 1500 A 44
ABC News/Wash Post 10/8 - 10/11 991 RV 43
CNBC 10/4 - 10/7 800 A 41
CNN 10/4 - 10/7 920 RV 43
Emerson 10/1 - 10/4 1000 RV 43
NPR/PBS/Marist 10/1 - 10/1 996 RV 43
Nice liberal deflection, you're surely the triggered one.
Did your boyfriend not put out on Election Night over the devastating loss and you're still upset about it?
Poor little Racket, he wasted his vote on Hillary Clinton and he can't get over it.
Keep crying while I'm laughing.
You're so consumed with Trump that he's won in more ways than you know.
He owns you Racket, he owns you bigtime!
Fentrekker wrote:
TransparentCorruption wrote:
Trump supports corrupt regimes, eg Russia and Saudi Arabia, because they line his pockets and the pockets of the people he cares about. I don’t support the Democrats, but I can’t support someone so blatently un-American. I guess some might say that acting in the interest of greed over all else is American. I don’t agree.
If you don’t vote Democratic than you are complicit. I am a socialist, and thus I detest the Democrats,, but not nearly as much as the Republicans. It is insanity not to support the lesser of two evils.
Yet I'm the insane one who voted for Clinton! What was I thinking?
Racket is Sad:) wrote:
Racket wrote:
u mad bro? >:)
Nice liberal deflection, you're surely the triggered one.
Did your boyfriend not put out on Election Night over the devastating loss and you're still upset about it?
Poor little Racket, he wasted his vote on Hillary Clinton and he can't get over it.
Keep crying while I'm laughing.
You're so consumed with Trump that he's won in more ways than you know.
He owns you Racket, he owns you bigtime!
OK roger that, rage confirmed.
Sure, you win and I'm wrong.
DEMOCRATS violently assault two GOP candidates. This is the direct result of DEMOCRAT leaders encouraging violence against any political dissent. This, combined with the censorship of all things conservative by the media and we truly are in a Brave New World.
https://freebeacon.com/politics/two-gop-candidates-assaulted-minnesota/
Democrats are cancer.
Silliest of Willies wrote:
proves it wrote:
What actually proved it was Trump screaming he would pay $1,000,000 if she had any Native American blood. Then the DNA test. Then Trump screaming, "who cares?" Then Trump claiming he has to do the DNA test himself because, "junk science."
Elizabeth Warren proved it.
Trump cannot handle the truth.
You do realize that Warren's *most recent* DNA test reveal was a MASSIVE flop though, right? Between 1/64 and 1/1024 is laughable to CLAIM THAT AS YOUR IDENTITY ON A JOB APPLICATION.
Warren lost. Bigly.
trumper, she never claimed that identity on a job application.
Protip: Stop listening to right wing media. They lie day and night to get you all angry .
agip wrote:
Protip: Stop listening to right wing media. They lie day and night to get you all angry .
Spoken by a true socialist. Always dictating what others should think, see, and do. I believe you're a "teacher," so it's probably better that you're wasting time on the interwebz than further spewing your commie hate-speech to our children.
Black Rifles Matter wrote:
agip wrote:
Protip: Stop listening to right wing media. They lie day and night to get you all angry .
Spoken by a true socialist. Always dictating what others should think, see, and do. I believe you're a "teacher," so it's probably better that you're wasting time on the interwebz than further spewing your commie hate-speech to our children.
dude, I work in the capital markets.
Cheers.
agip wrote:
Black Rifles Matter wrote:
Spoken by a true socialist. Always dictating what others should think, see, and do. I believe you're a "teacher," so it's probably better that you're wasting time on the interwebz than further spewing your commie hate-speech to our children.
dude, I work in the capital markets.
Cheers.
My mistake, I own it. But you don't refute the socialist part.
couple things:
1) The report goes to Rosenstein. The report will have recommendations. If Rosenstein follows the recommendations, I believe that Rosenstein can bury the report. However if Rosenstein chooses NOT to follow Mueller's recommendations, then the report goes to congress and presumably will become public.
2) If the Dems take the house they can legally demand trump's tax returns. That's an actual law, passed after Teapot Dome. Will they? And will trump comply? I'm sure it will be a legal fight, but the law is a law. But trumpers will delay handing them over, for sure.
3) The emoluments case is proceeding, probably to SCOTUS. If SCOTUS decides the constitution says trump can't profit from business with foreigners, then he can't do it. Will he follow what scotus says? Maybe. The Court does not have an army.
4) Always remember Kushner ran the campaign data project. That project had tons of info on which voters would be movable by fake news social media. I think it is more than likely he gave that info to sketchy characters linked to Russia. Probably via Cambridge analytica or some other thing.
5) Trump and Kush will be convicted of financial crimes unless pardoned or the statute of limitations runs out. Ivanka has serious fraud/bank fraud issues - she made wild promises about trump properties that were sheer lies.
Black Rifles Matter wrote:
agip wrote:
dude, I work in the capital markets.
Cheers.
My mistake, I own it. But you don't refute the socialist part.
I am not a socialist.
But you probably don't even know what Socialist means, so this discussion is empty.
Black Rifles Matter wrote:
DEMOCRATS violently assault two GOP candidates. This is the direct result of DEMOCRAT leaders encouraging violence against any political dissent. This, combined with the censorship of all things conservative by the media and we truly are in a Brave New World.
https://freebeacon.com/politics/two-gop-candidates-assaulted-minnesota/Democrats are cancer.
Suspended one week without pay. That's pretty harsh.
Alls I know is that my 401k has been stinking under Trump. He lied and told me that the market would be on “jet fuel” after the new tax regs. Yeah for a hot minute.
Also the budget stinks too. Falling into further debt won’t help my kids much. I thought he said he was the king of debt and would bring us out of debt. I’m starting to worry
Black Rifles Matter wrote:
Spoken by a true socialist.
Would you consider yourself to be a true anti-socialist?
Josh S. wrote:
Black Rifles Matter wrote:
DEMOCRATS violently assault two GOP candidates. This is the direct result of DEMOCRAT leaders encouraging violence against any political dissent. This, combined with the censorship of all things conservative by the media and we truly are in a Brave New World.
https://freebeacon.com/politics/two-gop-candidates-assaulted-minnesota/Democrats are cancer.
Suspended one week without pay. That's pretty harsh.
I can’t believe that despite Trumps constant message of unity, this still goes on.
And here we have further proof that the "moral" majority, the "Christian" right, . . . is a loosely organized branch of Satan Inc.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/evangelical-leader-pat-robertson-saudi-003944218.html
Fat dude - I respect you. And I wish that many, MANY so-called Christians were a whole lot more like you.
What is the threshold that separates a "hobbyjogger" from a "sub-elite" runner?
BREAKING: Leonard Korir not going to Paris! 11 Universality athletes get in ahead of him!
Hicham El Guerrouj is back baby! Runs Community Mile in Oxford
Do "running influencers" harm the competitive nature of the sport?
Why's it cost every household $5000 in taxes just to run a public school?