Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

My name is Eric A Blair and I am an addict

But I've just gone 10 days without a political posting on Facebook.

Youse guys are riding the shock wave of that abstinence - but I'm sure you can handle it.

hey exthrower - honest question -

you ok with Jared Kushner having such a major role?

-negotiating middle east peace

-solving opiod epidemic

-diplomacy with Mexico

-diplomacy with china

-reforming veteran care

-reforming the entire federal government

You ok with that?

and would you be ok if Obama had put his (black) son in law in charge of all that?

LOL @ Flagpole Flagpoling and now trying to make a comeback.

Hey, can we recap Obama's lies please?

Punish bankers

Close Guantanamo

Save families $2500/yr on health insurance

You can keep your plan

Benghazi was because of a drawing

We didn't give Iran a planeload of cash negotiating with terrorists

DONALD TRUMP WILL NOT BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!

Hahaha

Looks like the upcoming spending bill is not going to have the border wall.

And surprising Mexico has not offered to pay for it.

Obamacare repeal isn't happening.

The Muslim ban isn't going so well.

What significant campaign promise will Trump keep by the 100 day mark?

L L wrote:

Looks like the upcoming spending bill is not going to have the border wall.

And surprising Mexico has not offered to pay for it.

Obamacare repeal isn't happening.

The Muslim ban isn't going so well.

What significant campaign promise will Trump keep by the 100 day mark?

None of that worries me as much as the reported 20% tariff on Canadian lumber. That would be a YUGE mistake. Hopefully it will be stopped.

I think you make a perfect example.

Trump supporters don't care about anything he accomplishes or doesn't do as long as it's their guy in there.

They're not going to do the Canadian tariff or Mexican tariff or anything like that.

This 15% corporate tax rate is not likely to stick either.

L L wrote:

I think you make a perfect example.

Trump supporters don't care about anything he accomplishes or doesn't do as long as it's their guy in there.

They're not going to do the Canadian tariff or Mexican tariff or anything like that.

This 15% corporate tax rate is not likely to stick either.

Hillary is not President, and Gorsuch is on the SC. Everything else is gravy. Given that every institution in the US is fighting against Trump I would be shocked if he got anything done. I just don't want anything bad to happen, and tariffs are bad. I hope it's just some negotiating ploy. Probably is. Let's see what happens.

You are too busy trying to destroy Trump and his supporters to take in what's happening. Relax a little and soak it up for a while. Nothing disastrous has happened yet.

Right. It's more about Hillary not being there to you.

I get the SC thing.

"Nothing disastrous has happened yet."

Is there a reason you included the word "yet"?

Expecting something disastrous?

Trump destroys himself.

He is all BS.

And I know that's fine with you but it really shouldn't be fine.

DiscoGary wrote:

L L wrote:

I think you make a perfect example.

Trump supporters don't care about anything he accomplishes or doesn't do as long as it's their guy in there.

They're not going to do the Canadian tariff or Mexican tariff or anything like that.

This 15% corporate tax rate is not likely to stick either.

Relax a little and soak it up for a while. Nothing disastrous has happened yet.

Yes, disastrous things have happened.

Trump has burneed the good name of the US around the world, with the muslim bans, with the badmouthing allies and flattering hostiles, with the incessant lying - endless, endless lying. With calling the press the enemy of the people, with the killing off environmental regulations, with the hollowing out of the federal government, with the awful precedent that a candidate can lie and lie and lie, win, break all his promises but still have the support of 80% of his voters.

but oh yeah, gorsuch. What a mighty achievement. A prez with an IQ of 75 and a major stroke could have "done" that.

L L wrote:

Right. It's more about Hillary not being there to you.

I get the SC thing.

"Nothing disastrous has happened yet."

Is there a reason you included the word "yet"?

Expecting something disastrous?

Trump destroys himself.

He is all BS.

And I know that's fine with you but it really shouldn't be fine.

Sure. Trump could easily do something wrong. He isn't an ideologue, so nothing he does is based on principle, economic theory, or sound ideological foundations. He's a loose cannon which could easily turn around and fire at me. If Trump does something wrong it won't be because he meant to do it. He just won't know any better.

But that's infinitely better than Hillary and the Democrats which are a battery of artillery aimed directly at me, firing non-stop. Hillary and the Democrats' ideas are based corrupt principles, bad economic theory, and unsound ideology. Democrats intentionally do horrible things all the time. They know exactly what they are doing.

Therefore, Trump.

eric a blair wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Relax a little and soak it up for a while. Nothing disastrous has happened yet.

Yes, disastrous things have happened.

Trump has burneed the good name of the US around the world, with the muslim bans, with the badmouthing allies and flattering hostiles, with the incessant lying - endless, endless lying. With calling the press the enemy of the people, with the killing off environmental regulations, with the hollowing out of the federal government, with the awful precedent that a candidate can lie and lie and lie, win, break all his promises but still have the support of 80% of his voters.

but oh yeah, gorsuch. What a mighty achievement. A prez with an IQ of 75 and a major stroke could have "done" that.

He has the support of 96% of his voters. If you don't understand why, I can try to explain it, but if you didn't understand it before the election you probably won't understand it now.

DiscoGary wrote:

eric a blair wrote:

Yes, disastrous things have happened.

Trump has burneed the good name of the US around the world, with the muslim bans, with the badmouthing allies and flattering hostiles, with the incessant lying - endless, endless lying. With calling the press the enemy of the people, with the killing off environmental regulations, with the hollowing out of the federal government, with the awful precedent that a candidate can lie and lie and lie, win, break all his promises but still have the support of 80% of his voters.

but oh yeah, gorsuch. What a mighty achievement. A prez with an IQ of 75 and a major stroke could have "done" that.

He has the support of 96% of his voters. If you don't understand why, I can try to explain it, but if you didn't understand it before the election you probably won't understand it now.

Noted that of course you deflect from 'disasters' to 'support of his voters.'

Gawd Repubs are infuriating.

And I do understand why 80% of Repubs support him.

Eric a blair wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

He has the support of 96% of his voters. If you don't understand why, I can try to explain it, but if you didn't understand it before the election you probably won't understand it now.

Noted that of course you deflect from 'disasters' to 'support of his voters.'

Gawd Repubs are infuriating.

And I do understand why 80% of Repubs support him.

They do seem to be grasping at straws.

That 96% were asked if they would still vote for him again. Yes, 96% of Trump voters would still rather have Trump than Hillary. That's not a very meaningful statistic. Frankly, the 4% slip might mean he would lose if the same election were held today.

Btw I'm sure BHO had the support of at least 80% of Dems or 96% of his voters - same as trump. By your logic that makes BHO a successful president, with major accomplishments. You think that, right? Right?

Could you just try to be a little analytical and evenhanded? A little try?

Fat hurts wrote:

They do seem to be grasping at straws.

That 96% were asked if they would still vote for him again. Yes, 96% of Trump voters would still rather have Trump than Hillary. That's not a very meaningful statistic. Frankly, the 4% slip might mean he would lose if the same election were held today.

I didn't do the exact math, but if 4% of Trump voters switched or stayed home, it looks like Hillary would have easily won Michigan, Wisconsin, Florida, and Pennsylvania.

The news is not that 96% of his supporters are still with him. It's that 4% of his supporters already regret their vote after only 100 days. If he doesn't turn things around it will spell big trouble in the midterms.

This poster really got under your skin, must have nothing to do with you being gay

Hillary is not President, and Gorsuch is on the SC. Everything else is gravy.

You are gullible simpleton if that's your standard for a POTUS

I just don't want anything bad to happen

Sure you don't, just like millions who voted for Trump. They just hated Hillary so much and that always more right.

You are basically admitting Trump could be absolutely disastrous yet you side with that high probability of failure over HRC, who would have been status quo - great display of logic there. You drank the cool aid and now you are experiencing buyer's remorse.

You are a real dimwit if you really believe A) things are that black and white and B) the GOP doesn't use the same strategies and are not aware of what they are doing

DiscoGary wrote:

eric a blair wrote:

Yes, disastrous things have happened.

Trump has burneed the good name of the US around the world, with the muslim bans, with the badmouthing allies and flattering hostiles, with the incessant lying - endless, endless lying. With calling the press the enemy of the people, with the killing off environmental regulations, with the hollowing out of the federal government, with the awful precedent that a candidate can lie and lie and lie, win, break all his promises but still have the support of 80% of his voters.

but oh yeah, gorsuch. What a mighty achievement. A prez with an IQ of 75 and a major stroke could have "done" that.

He has the support of 96% of his voters. If you don't understand why, I can try to explain it, but if you didn't understand it before the election you probably won't understand it now.

You throw these high %s around as if holds some absolute meaning. A 1.5% variation of votes in the election would have tipped the scale the other way, that's how close it was. Yes, the map looks red because of winner takes all, but the margins of victory were ridiculously close in several states. Lets just say it was too close for you trumpkins to still be running victory laps months later. But I get it, it's the one little victory you have to hang on to. Stay asleep and don't wake up, you'll be very disappointed.