Conundrum wrote:
Trump former aide, Sam Nunberg, defies his subpoena, says he won't testify and tells Mueller to arrest him.
"They want me to testify against Roger," Nunberg said. "They want me to say that Roger was going around telling people he was colluding with Julian Assange."
That idiot makes his mentor Roger Stone look guilty. I hope they do arrest him.
This dude is off the freakin' chain..
DiscoGary wrote:
This is good. Its about time that people stopped cooperating with this government coup. Everyone should just refuse to talk to Mueller and his henchmen.
Because the rule of law doesn't mean anything.
This is where DiscoGary states that Democrats have ignored the rule of law since they came into existence, and will point to IRS targeting (which Congress investigated and found no evidence that the IRS was acting on any orders from the Obama administration), Hilary Clinton selling US uranium to Russia (which didn't happen, since she wasn't actively involved in the transaction and her department was only one of several involved, and the donor for which she supposedly made this quid pro quo for had sold of his interest in Uranium One three years before the transaction and 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state), Bill Clinton lying under oath (who was impeached and acquitted on party lines), and maybe Andrew Johnson's attempt to fire Edwin Stanton (during an era in which the Republican and Democratic party platforms were essentially reversed from where they stand today, and a violation of the Tenure of Office Act for which he was impeached).
But even if you accepted all that right wing tripe as factual and relevant, since when does the opposition ignoring the law mean that it's then okay for you to ignore the law? That's only the case if you have no moral foundation, something we see regularly now.
Jeff Wigand wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
This is good. Its about time that people stopped cooperating with this government coup. Everyone should just refuse to talk to Mueller and his henchmen.
Because the rule of law doesn't mean anything.
This is where DiscoGary states that Democrats have ignored the rule of law since they came into existence, and will point to IRS targeting (which Congress investigated and found no evidence that the IRS was acting on any orders from the Obama administration), Hilary Clinton selling US uranium to Russia (which didn't happen, since she wasn't actively involved in the transaction and her department was only one of several involved, and the donor for which she supposedly made this quid pro quo for had sold of his interest in Uranium One three years before the transaction and 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state), Bill Clinton lying under oath (who was impeached and acquitted on party lines), and maybe Andrew Johnson's attempt to fire Edwin Stanton (during an era in which the Republican and Democratic party platforms were essentially reversed from where they stand today, and a violation of the Tenure of Office Act for which he was impeached).
But even if you accepted all that right wing tripe as factual and relevant, since when does the opposition ignoring the law mean that it's then okay for you to ignore the law? That's only the case if you have no moral foundation, something we see regularly now.
You are forgetting that Gary doesn’t live in reality. In his world, facts don’t matter, the FBI concocted a fake reason so that they could spy on Trump, and Mueller is driven by political enemy motives. He doesn’t see it as “rule of law” because he ate up the Fox fantasy narrative.
DiscoGary wrote:
Conundrum wrote:
Trump former aide, Sam Nunberg, defies his subpoena, says he won't testify and tells Mueller to arrest him.
"They want me to testify against Roger," Nunberg said. "They want me to say that Roger was going around telling people he was colluding with Julian Assange."
That idiot makes his mentor Roger Stone look guilty. I hope they do arrest him.
This is good. Its about time that people stopped cooperating with this government coup. Everyone should just refuse to talk to Mueller and his henchmen.
So they should stop cooperating with an investigation with over a dozen indictments and multiple cooperating witnesses? What ever happened to "law and order"?
Good evening! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine PM?
this is it wrote:
Conundrum wrote:
Trump former aide, Sam Nunberg, defies his subpoena, says he won't testify and tells Mueller to arrest him.
"They want me to testify against Roger," Nunberg said. "They want me to say that Roger was going around telling people he was colluding with Julian Assange."
That idiot makes his mentor Roger Stone look guilty. I hope they do arrest him.
This dude is off the freakin' chain..
Maybe being arrested for refusing to honor a subpoena, is better than being arrested for something that might be uncovered during testimony.
I really can't see how anyone would cheer on his illegally attempting to obstruct the investigation.
This video bring tears of joy to my eyes. RIP Trump Panama. Hehehe.
DiscoGary wrote:
Conundrum wrote:
Trump former aide, Sam Nunberg, defies his subpoena, says he won't testify and tells Mueller to arrest him.
"They want me to testify against Roger," Nunberg said. "They want me to say that Roger was going around telling people he was colluding with Julian Assange."
That idiot makes his mentor Roger Stone look guilty. I hope they do arrest him.
This is good. Its about time that people stopped cooperating with this government coup. Everyone should just refuse to talk to Mueller and his henchmen.
That is the most ridiculous thing you have said, and that's a high bar. You are suggesting that the rule of law be ignored. He will go to prison if he does that. He laughed when interviewed tonight and said, "I'm not going to go to prison, come on." Umm...want to bet? You can't just ignore a subpoena like that, especially in such a public way...the would be insane to allow him to just defy the order...that would embolden all people getting subpoenas in the country. He might get them to request fewer e-mails, but he will have to fall in line or go to prison.
Ridiculous to say that people should not cooperate with Mueller.
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
this is it wrote:
Conundrum wrote:
Trump former aide, Sam Nunberg, defies his subpoena, says he won't testify and tells Mueller to arrest him.
"They want me to testify against Roger," Nunberg said. "They want me to say that Roger was going around telling people he was colluding with Julian Assange."
That idiot makes his mentor Roger Stone look guilty. I hope they do arrest him.
This dude is off the freakin' chain..
"I'm going to end up cooperating with them," he said.
He made similar remarks to CNN and NBC News.
It was a reversal from his tone throughout the day, when he lashed out at Mr. Trump and his campaign and, in a series of interviews, threatened to defy Mueller.
He is a true nothing burger or should I say none-burger.
A very stable genius! wrote:
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
Pretty good but not as good as Trump’s pal Ichan after avoiding a giant sell off in steel stocks by dumping $30M worth just a couple of days before Trump’s tariff hike announcement. Yeah, he’s just a good money manager, no issue there.
Flagpole wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
This is good. Its about time that people stopped cooperating with this government coup. Everyone should just refuse to talk to Mueller and his henchmen.
That is the most ridiculous thing you have said, and that's a high bar. You are suggesting that the rule of law be ignored. He will go to prison if he does that. He laughed when interviewed tonight and said, "I'm not going to go to prison, come on." Umm...want to bet? You can't just ignore a subpoena like that, especially in such a public way...the would be insane to allow him to just defy the order...that would embolden all people getting subpoenas in the country. He might get them to request fewer e-mails, but he will have to fall in line or go to prison.
Ridiculous to say that people should not cooperate with Mueller.
Man you are such an obnoxious subjective lunatic of a person, how does your family put up with you? Too much snow in Ohio setting your dumb side off? Grow up already.
Gaglygooch wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
That is the most ridiculous thing you have said, and that's a high bar. You are suggesting that the rule of law be ignored. He will go to prison if he does that. He laughed when interviewed tonight and said, "I'm not going to go to prison, come on." Umm...want to bet? You can't just ignore a subpoena like that, especially in such a public way...the would be insane to allow him to just defy the order...that would embolden all people getting subpoenas in the country. He might get them to request fewer e-mails, but he will have to fall in line or go to prison.
Ridiculous to say that people should not cooperate with Mueller.
Man you are such an obnoxious subjective lunatic of a person, how does your family put up with you? Too much snow in Ohio setting your dumb side off? Grow up already.
There is no content in your post.
///
.
.
.
.
.
.
(how did I do, Conundrum?)
PIO! wrote:
Gaglygooch wrote:
Man you are such an obnoxious subjective lunatic of a person, how does your family put up with you? Too much snow in Ohio setting your dumb side off? Grow up already.
There is no content in your post.
///
.
.
.
.
.
.
(how did I do, Conundrum?)
Why the hell were you so nice to that freakin idiot!!
Flagpole has dominated this thread and I find his intelligence slightly arousing. Here's a pro life tip: Women like me gravitate toward smart men with good values and morals. They are natural leaders.
As for you, jamin, hardloper, disco, dff and so forth, there is an easy explanation for your frustration and anger.
Typical cry baby whining liberals, complain over someone's response to a post.
Your handle aptly fits you conundrum.
What a certified dipsh*t, LOL!!!!
Noticer of dominance wrote:
Flagpole has dominated this thread and I find his intelligence slightly arousing. Here's a pro life tip: Women like me gravitate toward smart men with good values and morals. They are natural leaders.
As for you, jamin, hardloper, disco, dff and so forth, there is an easy explanation for your frustration and anger.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/gy893x/conservatives-are-whining-because-no-one-wants-to-date-them-vgtrn
Hi Flagpole!
Just another normal day at the WH:
Conway violated the hatch Act - twice
Sam Nunberg goes into hiding
More questions about Ichan's steel stock dumping
Trollminator wrote:
Just another normal day at the WH:
Conway violated the hatch Act - twice
Sam Nunberg goes into hiding
More questions about Ichan's steel stock dumping
Just like the Clinton days, right?
Conundrum wrote:
PIO! wrote:
There is no content in your post.
///
.
.
.
.
.
.
(how did I do, Conundrum?)
Why the hell were you so nice to that freakin idiot!!
Dang, I can't do anything right!
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!