Sieg Heil !
S i e g H e i l !
S i e g H e i l !
S i e g H e i l !
S i e g H e i l !
S i e g H e i l !
Sieg Heil !
S i e g H e i l !
S i e g H e i l !
S i e g H e i l !
S i e g H e i l !
S i e g H e i l !
Hello Hillary lovers. Still butt hurt?
Hahahahaha!!!!!!
Mueller? Mueller? Mueller?
Hahahahaha!!!!!!
I am so obsessed with Hillary that I constantly giggle to myself. Tee he he he he he he .... :\
Obvi wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I don't know what he might have thought, or why it really matters.
In other words you recognize the absurdity of your thought process and don't have the integrity to admit it.
Got it.
Why is it absurd that I don't know or care what some creature millions of years ago was thinking? Is this something that keeps you up at night?
Gentleman Jane wrote:
"Georgia's lieutenant governor on Monday threatened to prevent Delta Air Lines from getting a lucrative tax cut after the company ended its discount program with the National Rifle Association, in the latest fallout from a deadly school shooting in Florida.
Delta is part of a growing chorus of businesses cutting ties with the NRA after the Valentine's Day shooting at a Florida high school left 17 people dead. But now the airline is coming under attack, with Georgia's lieutenant governor threatening a sales tax exemption making its way through the legislature.
Republican Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle, president of the state Senate and a leading candidate to succeed Gov. Nathan Deal, tweeted that he would use his position to sink the proposed sales tax exemption on jet fuel.
"I will kill any tax legislation that benefits @Delta unless the company changes its position and fully reinstates its relationship with @NRA," Cagle tweeted. "Corporations cannot attack conservatives and expect us not to fight back." "
https://www.yahoo.com/news/georgia-republicans-upset-delta-cuts-210140600.htmlThis is one of the most shocking acts I have ever seen from a politician - using the power of the state to attempt to coerce Delta into supporting the Lt Gov's favorite organization.
This is not about the NRA. You can love them or hate them - doesn't matter. This is about a profound abuse of power by an elected official. If the Lt Gov is not slapped down HARD then this will be a terrifyingly clear signal that we have already become a banana republic
I agree. But Cagle's move does make sense. He's running for governor and facing a tough primary. In Georgia, you can't win a Republican primary without strong support from the NRA.
Fat hurts wrote:
Gentleman Jane wrote:
"Georgia's lieutenant governor on Monday threatened to prevent Delta Air Lines from getting a lucrative tax cut after the company ended its discount program with the National Rifle Association, in the latest fallout from a deadly school shooting in Florida.
Delta is part of a growing chorus of businesses cutting ties with the NRA after the Valentine's Day shooting at a Florida high school left 17 people dead. But now the airline is coming under attack, with Georgia's lieutenant governor threatening a sales tax exemption making its way through the legislature.
Republican Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle, president of the state Senate and a leading candidate to succeed Gov. Nathan Deal, tweeted that he would use his position to sink the proposed sales tax exemption on jet fuel.
"I will kill any tax legislation that benefits @Delta unless the company changes its position and fully reinstates its relationship with @NRA," Cagle tweeted. "Corporations cannot attack conservatives and expect us not to fight back." "
https://www.yahoo.com/news/georgia-republicans-upset-delta-cuts-210140600.htmlThis is one of the most shocking acts I have ever seen from a politician - using the power of the state to attempt to coerce Delta into supporting the Lt Gov's favorite organization.
This is not about the NRA. You can love them or hate them - doesn't matter. This is about a profound abuse of power by an elected official. If the Lt Gov is not slapped down HARD then this will be a terrifyingly clear signal that we have already become a banana republic
I agree. But Cagle's move does make sense. He's running for governor and facing a tough primary. In Georgia, you can't win a Republican primary without strong support from the NRA.
"Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer!"
Brannenly wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
I agree generally with this. Some points though:
1) Democrats have had to respond to almost daily chaos out of the White House, so that has limited much of what they can do with regard to inspiring others to vote for them.
2) Normally, being against the sitting President isn't enough, but this time it likely is. Trump's approval rating is 35%, and he's the most hated President ever.
3) The gun issue will be big too. 7 in 10 Americans believe we should have some more gun control.
Jesus, you're still living in la-la land.
1) Supposed "chaos" from the White House should help the Dems gain support, no? The problem this time around is the steady stream of information coming out about the Dems/HRC/DNC actually being more corrupt and collusion-prone that the accused POTUS. America's greatly reduced confidence in our political and intelligence institutions is completely justified at the moment. As long as they continue to be exposed, the Dems will have trouble gaining power.
2) Not a single poll has Trump at 35%. In the non-intentionally-low (based on 2016 election and recent accuracy) polls, he is on a steady uptrend. One of the more accurate with regard to Trump's popularity has him at 50%.
Remember, Obama's average for his entire 8 years was 47%, so it really doesn't mean much anyhow.
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html3) Gun control matters little.
1) Dude, you are 100% wrong with your point #1. Chaos is in the White House, as I said, and for the 2018 election, that is more than enough for Democrats this time. You are the one in La La Land.
2) You linked polls that were older than the one I quoted -- Latest CNN poll (and yes, you will say it is biased, but for CNN it was the lowest showing even for Trump -
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/25/politics/cnn-poll-trump-approval-matches-low/index.html- poll shows he has dropped 5% since Jan. So, you said "not one poll". Well, you are wrong and I am right.
3) The gun thing will matter little. I agree, but it will matter a little. Republicans certainly aren't on the winning side of this, so that can't help them.
Also, to the delusional dude who said that Hillary and the Democrats have been shown to be more corrupt than the President, know this:
1) Mueller will present information about Trump that will shock you. Won't shock me, because I know what a crook he is, but you will be shocked...or you will believe it is a conspiracy against the President, in which case someone (electro-shock therapy technician) should shock you.
2) History will remember that Donald Trump and his associates were the criminals here and the great threat to our democracy. Robert Mueller will be remembered as a patriot and savior of our democracy...at least until the next conservative despot rears his (and it will be his) ugly head.
3) Anyone who has witnessed what has gone on since Trump became President and thinks that the Democrats have been shown to be worse is brainwashed by someone.
4) You conservatives get a few days past the latest round of indictments and then there's another major news story, and for some reason you think Trump will be just fine. He is in serious trouble, and no other major news story will prevent him from having to pay the piper. Mueller and his staff quietly continue their work.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Republicans will definitely lose on the gun issue as they “enjoy” much more support from the NRA and have to swallow this pill of scrutiny for as long as this is a hot topic. Their fearless leader talking about going in to confront the shooter with his bare hands will ensure the conversation continues.
hare wrote:
Moving right along: I think it's important that people understand what SCOTUS did and did not do with regard to DACA.
It simply did not grant the Administration's request for an immediate decision about whether the Administration can shut down DACA. Instead, it said that SCOTUS expected an appeals court to proceed "expeditiously" to decide the case. The effect is that those currently enrolled in DACA may continue in it until the court(s) make a final decision.
As a practical matter, this means that the "Dreamers" who did not sign up for DACA are still subject to deportation at any time; and that those who are enrolled remain in limbo until/unless Congress finally comes up with some kind of immigration plan that the President would approve--which, now that the pressure of a March 5th deadline is off, will probably not happen before the legal process plays out, and almost certainly not before this year's midterm elections.
Bottom line: SCOTUS's decision not to bypass the appeals process leaves things pretty much as they are, while court challenges continue. It does not count as a major defeat for the Administration or major win for Dreamers.
Libs: can anyone actually defend the district court judge's ruling? If Obama had the power to create DACA, it seems self evident that Trump has the power to undo the exact same action whenever he wants (it seems people expect the Supreme Court to side with him). Sounds like a ridiculous usurpation of a judge's authority with bad implications, yet the media cheers only because it is a 'setback' to Drumpfcheetonazi.
Jeff Wigand wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/25/politics/cnn-poll-trump-approval-matches-low/index.htmlBrannenly wrote:
2) Not a single poll has Trump at 35%.
LOL- CNN, seriously? That "poll" coincidentally came out the DAY AFTER Rasmussen's 50% and The Economist's 47%. Why do you think that is? Hmmm
Again- You don't say someone "has a rating of XX%" based on a single poll. You always take a poll of polls.
You Lefties are falling into the same trap you did leading up to the Great Flagpole of 2016. Echo chamber polling is not good polling.
From John Dean (Watergate):
"Mueller is throwing everything he can against Manafort, including Gates who can nail him. Increasingly it appears Manafort is the link to Russian collusion. If Gates can testify that Manafort was acting with Trump’s blessings, it’s the end of his presidency. That’s substantial."
Flagpole wrote:
Also, to the delusional dude who said that Hillary and the Democrats have been shown to be more corrupt than the President, know this:
1) Mueller will present information about Trump that will shock you. Won't shock me, because I know what a crook he is, but you will be shocked...or you will believe it is a conspiracy against the President, in which case someone (electro-shock therapy technician) should shock you.
2) History will remember that Donald Trump and his associates were the criminals here and the great threat to our democracy. Robert Mueller will be remembered as a patriot and savior of our democracy...at least until the next conservative despot rears his (and it will be his) ugly head.
3) Anyone who has witnessed what has gone on since Trump became President and thinks that the Democrats have been shown to be worse is brainwashed by someone.
4) You conservatives get a few days past the latest round of indictments and then there's another major news story, and for some reason you think Trump will be just fine. He is in serious trouble, and no other major news story will prevent him from having to pay the piper. Mueller and his staff quietly continue their work.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
1) You hope.
2) You hope.
3) You believe.
4) You hope again.
WTF was that all about? You're like a child. A stupid, stupid child. More has been exposed about the Democrats and their collusion with Russia and conniving with the domestic MSM than a single piece of evidence about Trump. Mueller has done a fine job going after Manafort (a damn career lobbyist for Christ's sake! ...which is evident by his indictments being from well before helping Trump in the summer of 2016). His indictments mean nothing to the Trump presidency. No one outside of the Lib echo chamber cares. The Dem reactionary memo to the Nunes memo was a massive fail, and in fact contradicts statements that Comey made last year regarding the timing of the FISA warrants.
Mueller has not, and will not, be coming.
The clown has always been (since late 2015), and will continue to be, Flagpole.
Oh, and of course, Flagpole WILL... probably have to go to more counseling because of POTUS45, DONALD J TRUMP!!!
Tick, tick.
Flagpoller wrote:
LOL- CNN, seriously? That "poll" coincidentally came out the DAY AFTER Rasmussen's 50% and The Economist's 47%. Why do you think that is? Hmmm
Again- You don't say someone "has a rating of XX%" based on a single poll. You always take a poll of polls.
You Lefties are falling into the same trap you did leading up to the Great Flagpole of 2016. Echo chamber polling is not good polling.
Read what was written originally.
Then read what was posted in response.
The statement that "not a single poll has Trump at 35%" was disproven.
It's just one poll. One poll that could have oversampled one group, or undersampled another.
But it's one poll that has Trump at 35%.
Hardloper wrote:
Libs: can anyone actually defend the district court judge's ruling? If Obama had the power to create DACA, it seems self evident that Trump has the power to undo the exact same action whenever he wants (it seems people expect the Supreme Court to side with him). Sounds like a ridiculous usurpation of a judge's authority with bad implications, yet the media cheers only because it is a 'setback' to Drumpfcheetonazi.
I am no legal scholar, but I agree with you that it sure SEEMS like Trump out to be able to undo DACA if he wishes.
Jeff Wigand wrote:
Flagpoller wrote:
LOL- CNN, seriously? That "poll" coincidentally came out the DAY AFTER Rasmussen's 50% and The Economist's 47%. Why do you think that is? Hmmm
Again- You don't say someone "has a rating of XX%" based on a single poll. You always take a poll of polls.
You Lefties are falling into the same trap you did leading up to the Great Flagpole of 2016. Echo chamber polling is not good polling.
Read what was written originally.
Then read what was posted in response.
The statement that "not a single poll has Trump at 35%" was disproven.
It's just one poll. One poll that could have oversampled one group, or undersampled another.
But it's one poll that has Trump at 35%.
I'm still waiting to see that 35% poll show up in the poll of polls. RealClear uses the CNN polls. Here it is, again showing CNN at 39%. That was the day the supposed "35%" poll came out.
It was, again, fake news.
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/Flagpoller wrote:
Jeff Wigand wrote:
Read what was written originally.
Then read what was posted in response.
The statement that "not a single poll has Trump at 35%" was disproven.
It's just one poll. One poll that could have oversampled one group, or undersampled another.
But it's one poll that has Trump at 35%.
I'm still waiting to see that 35% poll show up in the poll of polls. RealClear uses the CNN polls. Here it is, again showing CNN at 39%. That was the day the supposed "35%" poll came out.
It was, again, fake news.
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
Latest poll shows Trump at 50%!! Yay! I'll run with that one!
You guys and your reciting what the MSM tells you.... zero ability to think rationally in the face of tribalism.
EPlC Flagpole [a.k.a. HardLoper] wrote:
^Nuthingburger
Flagpole wrote:
Hardloper wrote:
Libs: can anyone actually defend the district court judge's ruling? If Obama had the power to create DACA, it seems self evident that Trump has the power to undo the exact same action whenever he wants (it seems people expect the Supreme Court to side with him). Sounds like a ridiculous usurpation of a judge's authority with bad implications, yet the media cheers only because it is a 'setback' to Drumpfcheetonazi.
I am no legal scholar, but I agree with you that it sure SEEMS like Trump out to be able to undo DACA if he wishes.
I don't count as a liberal, but when I have disagreed with a Federal judge's ruling I have always found it instructive to actually READ the ruling.
All of these rulings are readily available online, and easy to find with a quick Google search. They tend to produce a more nuanced understanding of cases that are very rarely cut and dried. To use one hoary example, whether you agree with Roe v. Wade or not, the reasoning for that decision is laid out very clearly.
Reading the lower-court rulings in these DACA cases doesn't take terribly long, and will make it easier to understand the later Appellate and SCOTUS decisions that will be coming down.
Bottom line: Try to avoid having an opinion about a judicial decision until you have read the judicial decision.
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Guys between age of 45 and 55 do you think about death or does it seem far away
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday