Are "products that breaks down into the same metabolites that one would get from using steroids" the only substances involved, as in no actual banned substances are contained in the supplments? I was under the, probably false, impression that actual banned substance were in the dietary supplments as this exerpt from the article on the letsrun front page suggests: "Tests carried out last year showed 94 out of 634 samples from non-hormonal dietary supplements were found to contain anabolic-androgenic steroids not listed on the label."
If substances are included that are not listed on the label, and it's NOT just that listed ingredients produce metabolites that are incriminating, then it seems reason for litigation, no?