"No one is is slaughtering people in the name of a religion. Only Muslims."
If you remove one 'is' from the first sentence, it makes sense on its own but is false. It cannot be true at the same time as the second "sentence."
"No one is is slaughtering people in the name of a religion. Only Muslims."
If you remove one 'is' from the first sentence, it makes sense on its own but is false. It cannot be true at the same time as the second "sentence."
Red Pill Giver wrote:
MeHereYouWhere?! wrote:There are good people of every nationality, race, religion, etc. There are bad people of every nationality, race, religion, etc. Doesn't matter if you are white, black, Asian, American, Catholic, Muslim, whatever.
Some religions have a higher proportion of bad people than others.
There are 100 times as many white people in the USA as Religion of Peace adherents yet the latter commit a majority of terrorist acts.
There's a reason "Hinduphobia" doesn't exist.
Light on the facts as usual.
"In the past decade, extremist Hindus have increased their attacks on Christians, until there are now several hundred per year. But this did not make news in the U.S. until a foreigner was attacked. In 1999, Graham Staines, an Australian missionary who had worked with leprosy patients for three decades, was burned alive in Orissa along with his two young sons. The brutal violence visited on Muslims in Gujarat in February 2002 also brought the dangers of Hindu extremism to world attention. Between one and two thousand Muslims were massacred after Muslims reportedly set fire to a train carrying Hindu nationalists, killing several dozen people."
http://www.hudson.org/research/4575-hinduism-and-terrorkrispy kremlin. wrote:
The Washington Post has some warped definitions that need to be addressed by its readership.
Remember when we were having "nearly one mass shooting every day"? Their definition was at least 4 people wounded by gun fire - a tragedy but not what most people would call a mass shooting.
I'd be interested in how this, again, blatantly-liberal publication comes to their definition of "white supremacists".
Not everyone holding a Confederate flag is a white supremacist.
Lol
jjjjjjj wrote:
"No one is is slaughtering people in the name of a religion. Only Muslims."
If you remove one 'is' from the first sentence, it makes sense on its own but is false. It cannot be true at the same time as the second "sentence."
Sure it can. Islam is not a religion. Islam is a fascist political movement.
His dad supported HRC wrote:
Jimmy the Macedonian wrote:http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/24/majority-of-fatal-attacks-on-us-soil-carried-out-b/The Orlando night club guy killed 49 by himself. I thinking that "study" may have left out some data?
Of course it did. You don't even have to read just. This is how the left argues. They something in print and call it fact.
Road trip. wrote:
Reel K5 wrote:[quote]Chewbaccca wrote:
No one is is slaughtering people in the name of a religion.
Never heard of Israel?
Thank you.
Slaughtering in the name of Allah, then yes.
Just a couple thoughts:
1. I think it's impossible, and pointless, to try and prove that one group of people are exclusively responsible for evil. All men are capable of evil, regardless of religion, race, or class.
2. With that said, we do need to take a hard look at Islam in light of what has become a pattern of evil actions manifested in violence. The same scrutiny that is applied to other groups must also be applied to this one if we ever expect meaningful change. For example, supporting your family or being proud of your heritage are not evil intentions, but the KKK is an evil manipulation of what could be wholesome ideas and feelings. Christian doctrine is a positive force of good in our country, but west bourough baptist church is an evil manipulation of that theology. We can make these distinctions because we have honestly scrutinized these groups and beliefs, we would be foolish not to do the same to Islam.
3. In response to the conversation regarding immigration policy, remember that government operates between two ideological poles, one being "compassion" and the other being "control". The poem at the bottom of the Statue of Liberty eloquently extols the virtues our nation is built upon, however, we cannot be virtuous if we lose control over a situation. Control allows us to be compassionate, without it, our country can be neither. That is why it's not only rational to vet this violent situation and secure our borders, but it is also the compassionate thing to do.
jjjjjjj wrote:
Red Pill Giver wrote:Some religions have a higher proportion of bad people than others.
There are 100 times as many white people in the USA as Religion of Peace adherents yet the latter commit a majority of terrorist acts.
There's a reason "Hinduphobia" doesn't exist.
Light on the facts as usual.
"In the past decade, extremist Hindus have increased their attacks on Christians, until there are now several hundred per year. But this did not make news in the U.S. until a foreigner was attacked. In 1999, Graham Staines, an Australian missionary who had worked with leprosy patients for three decades, was burned alive in Orissa along with his two young sons. The brutal violence visited on Muslims in Gujarat in February 2002 also brought the dangers of Hindu extremism to world attention. Between one and two thousand Muslims were massacred after Muslims reportedly set fire to a train carrying Hindu nationalists, killing several dozen people."
http://www.hudson.org/research/4575-hinduism-and-terror
You have to go back 20 years to find an instance of a Hindu attack?
What...? wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:Slaughtering in the name of Allah, then yes.
What's the difference between people murdering in the name of Islam and people murdering in the name of Judaism?
One (murdering in the name of Judaism) is non-existent. The other - murdering in the name of Islam is frequent.
SAlly V wrote:
Sbeefyk1 wrote:This dude was probably in America for at least 10-15 years. Us being in the Middle East pisses off muslims because we've literally destroyed their lands.
Ummm.... the French and the Belgians were never in their lands. Look what these animals did to them, putting nails and other instruments in their bombs to exact the most damage to the little girls and boys that they killed and maimed. Were they in the Middle East? NO, idiot.
The French and Belgians... seriously?
Open a fvcking book.
His dad supported HRC wrote:
Jimmy the Macedonian wrote:http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/24/majority-of-fatal-attacks-on-us-soil-carried-out-b/The Orlando night club guy killed 49 by himself. I thinking that "study" may have left out some data?
There is a lot of "data" missing surrounding Orlando.
I looked up Hindu terrrorist attacks - the only one I saw was the one 20 years ago.
Here is a list of Muslim terrorist attacks JUST IN 2016 - there are 1274. Look at your discretion. It is not a pretty sight.
What...? wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:Slaughtering in the name of Allah, then yes.
What's the difference between people murdering in the name of Islam and people murdering in the name of Judaism?
YUUUUUUGE difference. Israelis who do relocate to the USA are not terrorist threats unlike Abdul from Somalia.
Jimmy the Macedonian wrote:
Within any population, there is going to be violence.
So why are Americans tolerant of white nationalist violence, but completely intolerant of violence when it involves muslims?
Come on now, we tolerate all kinds of racial violence--ever heard of the little city called Chicago? 8 dead and 62 wounded over the Thanksgiving Day weekend. No white nationalist involved. And no one seems to care.
SAlly V wrote:
I looked up Hindu terrrorist attacks - the only one I saw was the one 20 years ago.
Here is a list of Muslim terrorist attacks JUST IN 2016 - there are 1274. Look at your discretion. It is not a pretty sight.
https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/terror-2016.htm
Not disagreeing with the propensity of Muslims to immigrate, refuse to assimilate, then act violently towards their adoptive hosts.
Remember King Leopold? To say Belgium has clean hands would ignore about 200+ years of genocide and imperialism in central Africa. I'm sure ISIS is well-versed.
France isn't much better.
I'm not saying any of the bullshit happening now is justified in any way.
It's 2016. No one (except euro-cucks) has time for Neanderthal-tier religions. Until people can put their backward ideologies behind themselves they should stay put. Let 'em fvck up their own "civilizations."
When did this embed feature get implemented to the boards? Been gone a while ...
doot doot wrote:
His dad supported HRC wrote:The Orlando night club guy killed 49 by himself. I thinking that "study" may have left out some data?
There is a lot of "data" missing surrounding Orlando.
Pretty crazy that an article left out a shooting that happened a year after it was published
Trews wrote:
The KKK are still here....and growing.
Planned Parenthood have killed more blacks than the KKK
Idontreallyknow wrote:
doot doot wrote:There is a lot of "data" missing surrounding Orlando.
Pretty crazy that an article left out a shooting that happened a year after it was published
Not what I was referring to.
Mostly interesting how a man trying to buy his first "assault weapon" was reported by the gun seller as suspicious then was able to carry said weapon and ten magazines into a club two weeks later to commit his act with near perfect execution. That's all. Nothing to see her. Just a disgruntled homosexual who's father claims to be the president-in-exile of Afghanistan. 🙈🙉
Not on US soil and not random killings.