So there are two girls on my track team that I want to date but I'm not sure which one I should go for.
Girl A is an 8/10, nice face, great body and a decent personality
Unfortunately she only runs 63.2 for the 400 (which is her main event)
Girl B is 6/10, face is just average, nice body and a great personality
She runs 57.5 for the 400 (Her main event is the 400 hurdles)
Help me out here
Girl A or Girl B?
B
High School or College?
B- all running aside a better personality makes a big difference
mediocresprinter wrote:
So there are two girls on my track team that I want to date but I'm not sure which one I should go for.
Girl A is an 8/10, nice face, great body and a decent personality
Unfortunately she only runs 63.2 for the 400 (which is her main event)
Girl B is 6/10, face is just average, nice body and a great personality
She runs 57.5 for the 400 (Her main event is the 400 hurdles)
Help me out here
Girl A or Girl B?
Are you an amateur? Date both at the same time.
Bone A
Date B
Politico wrote:
Bone A
Date B
Be honest,,, you DO NOT stand a chance with either one.
Which one is DTF?
Dr. Obvious wrote:
Are you an amateur? Date both at the same time.
Best advice /thread
Go with the one you click with more.
But as others have said, is this really a choice. Almost never is a person able to look at two people and "decide" you will date one of them. Those girls have to pick you, too.
You certainly shouldn't date a girl based on her quarter time.
You go by looks if you have a real choice.
Especially in high school.
Dating a hot girl leads to dating more girls when other hot girls see who you are dating.
False.
Bears Beets Battlestar Galactica.
Star wrote:
You certainly shouldn't date a girl based on her quarter time.
You go by looks if you have a real choice.
Especially in high school.
Dating a hot girl leads to dating more girls when other hot girls see who you are dating.
True, but I have a reputation to protect. How can I be seen dating someone who can't even break a minute for a 400 when she trains for it?
mediocresprinter wrote:
Star wrote:You certainly shouldn't date a girl based on her quarter time.
You go by looks if you have a real choice.
Especially in high school.
Dating a hot girl leads to dating more girls when other hot girls see who you are dating.
True, but I have a reputation to protect. How can I be seen dating someone who can't even break a minute for a 400 when she trains for it?
So your reputation is dependent on how fast the girl you dates is?
Which one is your sister?
Again, are you in HS or college?
I hope you date neither of them, for their sakes.
mediocresprinter wrote:
True, but I have a reputation to protect.
Reputation of dating ugly chicks?
This has to be a joke. A guy would make a dating decision on track time? No way. Hot girl yes even if she runs 2:00 400.
Colin Sahlman runs 1:45 and Nico Young runs 1:47 in the 800m tonight at the Desert Heat Classic
Molly Seidel Fails To Debut As An Ultra Runner After Running A Road Marathon The Week Before
Female coach having affair with male runner. Should I report it?
Megan Keith (14:43) DESTROYS Parker Valby's 5000 PB in Shanghai
Hallowed sub-16 barrier finally falls - 3 teams led by Villanova's 15:51.91 do it at Penn Relays!!!
Need female opinions: I’m dating a woman that is very sexual with me in public. Any tips/insight?