Depends. Just another early peaker. From a running standpoint it made no difference what she did - she would have still faded. Socially she really missed out on the college thing. Doing a degree later sucks compared to the 18-22 age experience.
Depends. Just another early peaker. From a running standpoint it made no difference what she did - she would have still faded. Socially she really missed out on the college thing. Doing a degree later sucks compared to the 18-22 age experience.
jimmy bobby wrote:
Stanford Fan wrote:I'm sure Elise Cranny is going to make bank after college. She is going to make Cain look like a chump. Cain only made one World Championship. Cranny is going to make at least 4 teams.
+1
Isn't the whole point of this thread and in fact the Mary Cain story...that predicting which girls will become national team women...is impossible? There's no way to know about Cranny...she may, she may not. There's nothing anyone can point to about her and say 'she is different - she is a lock"
einstwine wrote:
Depends. Just another early peaker. From a running standpoint it made no difference what she did - she would have still faded. Socially she really missed out on the college thing. Doing a degree later sucks compared to the 18-22 age experience.
How do you possibly know about her social experience, and what "would have been better" for somebody else? Are you an expert on the social development of people you don't know? Very presumptuous of you to think you know.
I shouldn't respond but I can't help it. Troll 1, me 0.