Have you ever met a climate change denier?
Have you ever met a climate change denier?
Cornell grad_ wrote:
Have you ever met a climate change denier?
No, but I have met many Global Warming Dupes and they always make me laugh with their gullibility. They are pretty stupid.
Yeah, I meet people all the time that deny that the climate has always been changing.
Coach Bb wrote:
Cornell grad_ wrote:Have you ever met a climate change denier?
No, but I have met many Global Warming Dupes and they always make me laugh with their gullibility. They are pretty stupid.
You have to give kudos to the architects of this hysteria though. Duped an entire generation and only a matter of time until they start stealing our wealth.
Cornell grad_ wrote:
Have you ever met a climate change denier?
Did I ever coach you at Cornell? Please email if so. I've never taken a course on the subject and would like to hear someone smart give me the facts. So please email me.
Until I get the facts from you, I guess my main thought on climate change is this. I'm worried about us all dying in a heat wave - a nuclear heat wave. The people who think we'll all die due to global warming clearly don't understand statistics. The odds of a nuclear holocaust wiping us all out in the next 200 years are way greater than climate change killing us in 1000.
And I doubt I'll be alive to see either occur.
Coach Bb wrote:
Cornell grad_ wrote:Have you ever met a climate change denier?
No, but I have met many Global Warming Dupes and they always make me laugh with their gullibility. They are pretty stupid.
When you meet global warming deniers it´s advisable not to laugh, or else:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqNMjZpSbnURojo you are a shallow thinker.
Hardly anyone is saying that the world and humanity will end due to climate change in the next 100 or 200 years. But it will need adaptation and the consequences will likely contribute to continued and increased strife.
Nuclear issues aside, overpopulation and exponential growth are the biggest long term threats. It's not sustainable.
I wish you would either get some education in these matters or just shut up.
Formerly lived on Sapsucker Woods Road
rojo wrote:
Cornell grad_ wrote:Have you ever met a climate change denier?
Did I ever coach you at Cornell? Please email if so. I've never taken a course on the subject and would like to hear someone smart give me the facts. So please email me.
Until I get the facts from you, I guess my main thought on climate change is this. I'm worried about us all dying in a heat wave - a nuclear heat wave. The people who think we'll all die due to global warming clearly don't understand statistics. The odds of a nuclear holocaust wiping us all out in the next 200 years are way greater than climate change killing us in 1000.
And I doubt I'll be alive to see either occur.
Yeah, you know the old saying:
Don't ever worry about any problem but the most likely one.
Or the other old saying:
Don't worry about any generation beyond your own.
observer of nutjobs wrote:
rojo wrote:Did I ever coach you at Cornell? Please email if so. I've never taken a course on the subject and would like to hear someone smart give me the facts. So please email me.
Until I get the facts from you, I guess my main thought on climate change is this. I'm worried about us all dying in a heat wave - a nuclear heat wave. The people who think we'll all die due to global warming clearly don't understand statistics. The odds of a nuclear holocaust wiping us all out in the next 200 years are way greater than climate change killing us in 1000.
And I doubt I'll be alive to see either occur.
Yeah, you know the old saying:
Don't ever worry about any problem but the most likely one.
Or the other old saying:
Don't worry about any generation beyond your own.
Also:
Don't concern yourself with anything unless it is likely to kill everyone. Not a human extinction event? Not a problem.
rojo wrote:
Cornell grad_ wrote:Have you ever met a climate change denier?
Did I ever coach you at Cornell? Please email if so. I've never taken a course on the subject and would like to hear someone smart give me the facts. So please email me.
Until I get the facts from you, I guess my main thought on climate change is this. I'm worried about us all dying in a heat wave - a nuclear heat wave. The people who think we'll all die due to global warming clearly don't understand statistics. The odds of a nuclear holocaust wiping us all out in the next 200 years are way greater than climate change killing us in 1000.
And I doubt I'll be alive to see either occur.
I suggest you look at this intuitive comic for some easy to digest information.
https://xkcd.com/1732/A person wrote:
rojo wrote:Did I ever coach you at Cornell? Please email if so. I've never taken a course on the subject and would like to hear someone smart give me the facts. So please email me.
Until I get the facts from you, I guess my main thought on climate change is this. I'm worried about us all dying in a heat wave - a nuclear heat wave. The people who think we'll all die due to global warming clearly don't understand statistics. The odds of a nuclear holocaust wiping us all out in the next 200 years are way greater than climate change killing us in 1000.
And I doubt I'll be alive to see either occur.
I suggest you look at this intuitive comic for some easy to digest information.
https://xkcd.com/1732/
Good chart for showing the current warming is nothing out of the ordinary.
Blah Blah. wrote:
A person wrote:I suggest you look at this intuitive comic for some easy to digest information.
https://xkcd.com/1732/Good chart for showing the current warming is nothing out of the ordinary.
Well yeah. I mean as long as 1 = 10 then yes, quite right!
Otherwise, not so much.
That chart is a joke.
rojo wrote:
Until I get the facts from you, I guess my main thought on cigarette smoking is this. I'm worried about us all dying in a heat wave - a nuclear heat wave. The people who think we'll all die due to cigarette smoking clearly don't understand statistics. The odds of a nuclear holocaust wiping us all out in the next 200 years are way greater than cigarette smoking killing us.
.
Rojo with reasoning from the 50's.
Coach Bb wrote:
That chart is a joke.
Compelling counter-argument. You really backed it up well.
observer of nutjobs wrote:
Coach Bb wrote:That chart is a joke.
Compelling counter-argument. You really backed it up well.
There is nothing there. The graph post 2016 is pure alarmist speculation. The data from 2000 to 2016 is fake; there has been no warming. Remove those two phony sections and there is nothing left.
Blah Blah. wrote:
observer of nutjobs wrote:Compelling counter-argument. You really backed it up well.
There is nothing there. The graph post 2016 is pure alarmist speculation. The data from 2000 to 2016 is fake; there has been no warming. Remove those two phony sections and there is nothing left.
I love all the LRC RWNJs who are EXPERTS on ALL topics becuase they have spent AT LEAST an hour googling biased terms that will result in searches supporting their tin-foil hat beliefs.
Here is the definitive answer for you all from LRC poster fat hurts....
Fat hurts wrote:
The scientific community overwhelmingly accepts anthropogenic global warming.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_changeGiven that fact, there are three possibilities:
1) The scientific community is made up of stupid people.
2) The scientific community is engaged in a global conspiracy.
3) The scientific community is made up of smart people who know how to do their jobs and are therefore very likely to be correct.
Those who think they know better than the scientists are picking #1. For example, you might hear someone say something to the effect of "Don't you know that some of the thermometers are in urban areas? It's hotter there."
Those who are paranoid are picking #2. For example, on talk radio I often hear, "The global warming crowd is out to destroy capitalism. It's all a hoax!"
Those who are well grounded in reality choose #3.
/EOT
All I had to do was look what that chart showed for 1998 and the first decade of this century. Just looking at that proved that chart is a joke.
From Fat Hurts.... wrote:
Blah Blah. wrote:There is nothing there. The graph post 2016 is pure alarmist speculation. The data from 2000 to 2016 is fake; there has been no warming. Remove those two phony sections and there is nothing left.
I love all the LRC RWNJs who are EXPERTS on ALL topics becuase they have spent AT LEAST an hour googling biased terms that will result in searches supporting their tin-foil hat beliefs.
Here is the definitive answer for you all from LRC poster fat hurts....
Fat hurts wrote:
The scientific community overwhelmingly accepts anthropogenic global warming.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_changeGiven that fact, there are three possibilities:
1) The scientific community is made up of stupid people.
2) The scientific community is engaged in a global conspiracy.
3) The scientific community is made up of smart people who know how to do their jobs and are therefore very likely to be correct.
Those who think they know better than the scientists are picking #1. For example, you might hear someone say something to the effect of "Don't you know that some of the thermometers are in urban areas? It's hotter there."
Those who are paranoid are picking #2. For example, on talk radio I often hear, "The global warming crowd is out to destroy capitalism. It's all a hoax!"
Those who are well grounded in reality choose #3.
/EOT
If they are "very likely to be correct" why do they continually have to go back and change what they previously predicted?
Pollly P wrote:
All I had to do was look what that chart showed for 1998 and the first decade of this century. Just looking at that proved that chart is a joke.
You still jibbering about 1998?
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
Guys between age of 45 and 55 do you think about death or does it seem far away