As he said post game, he was protesting men who don't other their children.
As he said post game, he was protesting men who don't other their children.
Screech wrote:
Tycobb wrote:Why do people who worship the 2nd Amendment hate the 1st. Aren't you guys always accusing the Democrats of intolerance?
Just shut up!!!
Read my lips - EVERYONE SHOULD STAND FOR THE NATIONAL ANTHEM. I haven't read the constitution myself per say, but it says you should be respectful.
Anyone who doesn't do this is a liberal!!
#makeamericagreatagain. #benghazi! #alllivesnatter
Maybe you SHOULD read the Constitution and not get back to us until you find the part where it says you have to stand for the national anthem.
Sick to the teeth. wrote:
The facts are that blacks, the least educated thirteen percent of the population, the least productive, most criminal, and most dependent on governmental charity, dominate national politics.
Virtually everything revolves around what blacks want, demand, do, or can’t do.
Their power seems without limit.
Courses of instruction in the schools, academic rigor, codes of dress, rules regarding unceasing obscenity, all must be set to suit them, as must be examinations for promotion in fire departments, the military, and police forces.
Blacks must be admitted to universities for which they are not remotely qualified, where departments of Black Studies must be established to please them.
Corporate work forces, federal departments, and elite high-schools must be judged not on whether they perform their functions but on whether they have the right number of blacks.
Do laws requiring identification to vote threaten to end multiple voting? The laws must go.
Do blacks not like Confederate flags? Adieu, flags.
We must never, ever say or do anything that might upset them, as virtually everything does - it is positively astonishing - America is dominated from the slums.
The dominance of the media by blacks is also impressive.
If a white shoots a black to defend himself, it becomes national news for weeks, or months, and riots follow, but when blacks engage in their unending racial attacks on whites, the media demurely look the other way.
The attackers are never black.
They are “teens.†Reporters who say otherwise are likely to be fired.
In effect, the thirteen percent censor the national press.
And don’t get me started about Obama.
Go back to Stormfront, Heinrich.
Only in the US are sporting events prefaced by a national anthem and taxpayer supported flyovers by military jets. If we're so special why do we need to make sure everyone agrees?
douglas burke wrote:
The NFL did NOT allow the Dallas Cowboys to wear a Blue Lives Matter badge, but says it is Kapernicks choice to not stand during National Anthem.
As a private entity, they should be able to require he stand during the National Anthem.
Hopefully the players demand he be kicked out of the league for his being Anti-American.
Fans should boycott watching NFL games as long as he is in the league.
When did you realize that you hate America? If it has been a while, have you considered leaving this great and free nation?
Dora the Agoraphobiac wrote:
Sick to the teeth. wrote:The facts are that blacks, the least educated thirteen percent of the population, the least productive, most criminal, and most dependent on governmental charity, dominate national politics.
Virtually everything revolves around what blacks want, demand, do, or can’t do.
Their power seems without limit.
Courses of instruction in the schools, academic rigor, codes of dress, rules regarding unceasing obscenity, all must be set to suit them, as must be examinations for promotion in fire departments, the military, and police forces.
Blacks must be admitted to universities for which they are not remotely qualified, where departments of Black Studies must be established to please them.
Corporate work forces, federal departments, and elite high-schools must be judged not on whether they perform their functions but on whether they have the right number of blacks.
Do laws requiring identification to vote threaten to end multiple voting? The laws must go.
Do blacks not like Confederate flags? Adieu, flags.
We must never, ever say or do anything that might upset them, as virtually everything does - it is positively astonishing - America is dominated from the slums.
The dominance of the media by blacks is also impressive.
If a white shoots a black to defend himself, it becomes national news for weeks, or months, and riots follow, but when blacks engage in their unending racial attacks on whites, the media demurely look the other way.
The attackers are never black.
They are “teens.†Reporters who say otherwise are likely to be fired.
In effect, the thirteen percent censor the national press.
And don’t get me started about Obama.
Go back to Stormfront, Heinrich.
Typical liberal response. You don't have the intellect to refute anything he or she said so you are helpless and forced to make an idiotic response. Go back to Loserville, Dora. LOL.
L'Average wrote:
Macdaddy wrote:Like it or not, soldiers fought for his right to do this. (But if you don't like it, why don't you just leave?)
Everyone who doesn't like someone or something should just leave.
Except me. I think I'll stay.
Now if the rest of you bums would just get the heck out of my country what a great place this would be!
Screech wrote:
Tycobb wrote:Why do people who worship the 2nd Amendment hate the 1st. Aren't you guys always accusing the Democrats of intolerance?
Just shut up!!!
Read my lips - EVERYONE SHOULD STAND FOR THE NATIONAL ANTHEM. I haven't read the constitution myself per say, but it says you should be respectful.
Anyone who doesn't do this is a liberal!!
#makeamericagreatagain. #benghazi! #alllivesnatter
The Constitution says you should be respectful? Really? Which article?
"Their power seems without limit"..... Yeah, kinda makes you wish you were born black, eh? Huh? You're glad to be white?! But the whole world revolves around 'them'. Why wouldn't you wish your kids were black too???
Conundrum wrote:
Tycobb wrote:Why do people who worship the 2nd Amendment hate the 1st. Aren't you guys always accusing the Democrats of intolerance?
I would be all for him doing what he wants on his private time. When he goes home, he can burn or spit on the flag if that makes him happy. I don't care.
But while he is being payed, and while tons of fans are paying to see a game, and listen to our national anthem, he should be required to show respect.
No one is forcing him to work for the NFL.
If he wants complete freedom, quit your job, and do whatever you want whenever you want to do it.
Goodell has no judgement, so what he decides will probably be wrong.
I'm a Democrat by the way.
Wow, what an idiot you are! Amazingly stupid!
Conundrum wrote:
Silent-majority wrote:Shut up, halfbreed loving democrat.
I don't think you read my post. I don't Kapernick should be allowed to disrespect the flag during the time he is working for and representing the NFL.
I happen to love this country and if we make you so mad, maybe you should move and try a different country.
Double down on stupid! You go, girl!
thejeff wrote:
Rocky Mountain non-Druggie wrote:That's funny. Because that is exactly the question you should be asking of yourself. If you hate America so much, why don't you just leave?
I see what you are trying to say, but there is a big difference between disrespecting the core values of our society and disrespecting the people who disrespect the core values of our society.
Even people who don't like certain actions of our country should respect the national anthem and the flag, because without the republic for which they stand, they wouldn't have the freedom to disagree with said actions.
Your comment is a cute quote, but misunderstands and exacerbates the problem.
Wrong on all counts. Even the "cute" part.
Choosing to not stand for the national anthem is not disrespecting the "core values" of our society (whatever those may be - care to define them?). In this particular case it is protesting the situation in this country WRT the lives of black people.
Do you think that the right to shoot black people for no reason and with no personal price being paid for these murders is a "core value" of our society? Because that is what C.K. is protesting.
Deg fineman wrote:
Dora the Agoraphobiac wrote:Go back to Stormfront, Heinrich.
Typical liberal response. You don't have the intellect to refute anything he or she said so you are helpless and forced to make an idiotic response. Go back to Loserville, Dora. LOL.
There's nothing to refute, you moran. None of it makes sense. Blacks are the least educated, most poverty-ridden, and most jailed, yet somehow they have "unlimited" political power? Are you kidding me?
I'm not about go write a five page essay explaining why most of his views on affirmative action, the confederate flag, voter fraud, AND police brutality are wrong, when I already know he won't hear it.
Beatles wrote:
I hate this line of logic. No the fans aren't paying him. He is being paid by his team and the NFL. The fans are paying admission to the team for the right to watch the team play. No fan is directly handing him money so to claim that the fans are paying him is complete Bulls*it.
Are you paying Samuel L Jackson when you go see a movie that he is in? No. He has already been paid according to his contract - the same thing applies here.
Conundrum wrote:Of course its the NFL's decision how they want their employees to comport themselves during the national anthem.
And as far as who is paying him, all the fans are paying his salary.
If he was my employee, representing my company to the paying public I would require him to respect our country while on the job.
I think he taking one helluva liberty expressing his own personal controversial opinion to such a widespread audience on his employers dime.
That a very minor part of the total argument.
Nevertheless, fans pay the nfl, the nfl takes that money and pays the players. So where does the money actually come from. Semantics.
Respect Ooh Yea! wrote:
Double down on stupid! You go, girl!
Think about what you want to say, put together a cogent argument supporting your views or just leave the posting to the adults.
"Steven" wrote:
Not a very convincing "urban" impression. Not very bling-y at all. Sad!
I just so Fridays with Iced Tea on the coloreds network, so that was my inspiration, didn't fool you.
I'm a limousine liberal. I live in a gated community and send my kids to private school but love everything Obama and Hillary stands for.
Conundrum wrote:
Respect Ooh Yea! wrote:Double down on stupid! You go, girl!
Think about what you want to say, put together a cogent argument supporting your views or just leave the posting to the adults.
Says the person who spelled paid "payed."
Rocky Mountain non-Druggie wrote:
thejeff wrote:I see what you are trying to say, but there is a big difference between disrespecting the core values of our society and disrespecting the people who disrespect the core values of our society.
Even people who don't like certain actions of our country should respect the national anthem and the flag, because without the republic for which they stand, they wouldn't have the freedom to disagree with said actions.
Your comment is a cute quote, but misunderstands and exacerbates the problem.
Wrong on all counts. Even the "cute" part.
Choosing to not stand for the national anthem is not disrespecting the "core values" of our society (whatever those may be - care to define them?). In this particular case it is protesting the situation in this country WRT the lives of black people.
Do you think that the right to shoot black people for no reason and with no personal price being paid for these murders is a "core value" of our society? Because that is what C.K. is protesting.
Core Values: Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
I do not think the right to murder is a core value, but you knew that when you asked.
There are ways to protest social and legal happenings without disrespecting the society that gives you the right to protest them.
If it makes you feel any better, nothing about your last reply was cute.
Thats a worse impression.
thejeff wrote:
Rocky Mountain non-Druggie wrote:Wrong on all counts. Even the "cute" part.
Choosing to not stand for the national anthem is not disrespecting the "core values" of our society (whatever those may be - care to define them?). In this particular case it is protesting the situation in this country WRT the lives of black people.
Do you think that the right to shoot black people for no reason and with no personal price being paid for these murders is a "core value" of our society? Because that is what C.K. is protesting.
Core Values: Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
I do not think the right to murder is a core value, but you knew that when you asked.
There are ways to protest social and legal happenings without disrespecting the society that gives you the right to protest them.
If it makes you feel any better, nothing about your last reply was cute.
There are lots of ways of protesting. Nobody could disagree with that. But there is nothing wrong with protesting by not standing for the national anthem.
Further, regarding, "the society that gives you the right to protest them" - No, society does not give anyone the right to protest. One intrinsically has that right. "Society" can merely trample on that intrinsic right but cannot give it in the first place.
Oh, and no, it really doesn't make me feel any better. None of your posts (or any other posts on here) make me feel any way at all.