Hayduke wrote:
if she is not a woman, then bolt is not a man. he has no right lining up against normal men.
there should be 4 groups. Women, WomenA, Men, MenA. The A groups are for men and women who physiologically exceed even the most above average talent.
It's just not the same thing. If you are a male 100m runner, your goal is to be the best 100m runner in the world - to beat Usain Bolt (PR=9.58 sec.). If you are a female 100m runner, your goal is not to be the best 100m runner in the world. That would be impossible and delusional because no woman is ever going to beat Usain Bolt over 100m. Instead, your goal is to be the best FEMALE 100m runner in the world - to beat Elaine Thompson (PR=10.70). If a female 100m runner is required to compete against someone who doesn't belong in the female category, you are effectively putting the prospect of being the best female 100m out of reach for female runners.
The key question is whether intersex athletes should be competing in the female category, which is a hard question without any good answers. But saying that intersex athletes shouldn't compete in the women's category is not the same thing as saying that very talented people should be excluded from competition. By its nature, the defining quality of women's sports is that it excludes men because the best women are not competitive with the best men. That requires some sort of decision on who is or isn't a "woman" for purposes of competitive athletics and whether intersex athletes go in the "women's" category or "men's" category.