Fine, maybe she has a genetic condition that helps her run fast. Doesn't mean she should be discriminated against and hated on. She is following the rules and competing where she is allowed. Makes sense to most reasonable people.
Fine, maybe she has a genetic condition that helps her run fast. Doesn't mean she should be discriminated against and hated on. She is following the rules and competing where she is allowed. Makes sense to most reasonable people.
When social misfits that are the SJWs look at the W800 finish and see gender misfits making the women that have the looks of their "oppressors", i.e. the cute, popular girls of their youth, cry in despair, it brings a song to their dark, twisted, starved little hearts.
All the women that got beat are humans too. Disadvantaged women! I think you are the ignorant one.
This is such a thoughtful, nuanced, and intelligent post.
What are you doing on this forum?
They have XX chromosomes. Perhaps nature is changing what women look like. Africans are ahead of the evolution curve. It's simply evolution bitches.
Justice4caster wrote:
GD wrote:_______________________________
Are you going to actually address anything I posed above? There is no argument in this quote. Athletics is inherently discriminatory. The question here is what sort of categories (and categories are inherently discriminatory) are the most defensible.
Fine, maybe she has a genetic condition that helps her run fast. Doesn't mean she should be discriminated against and hated on. She is following the rules and competing where she is allowed. Makes sense to most reasonable people.
_____________________________
To be clear, you are taking the stance that there should be a gender binary in athletics, and that any athletes that live as women ought to be able to compete as women? Is identity the basis upon which somebody can compete as a woman?
Justice4caster wrote:
GD wrote:_______________________________
Are you going to actually address anything I posed above? There is no argument in this quote. Athletics is inherently discriminatory. The question here is what sort of categories (and categories are inherently discriminatory) are the most defensible.
Fine, maybe she has a genetic condition that helps her run fast. Doesn't mean she should be discriminated against and hated on. She is following the rules and competing where she is allowed. Makes sense to most reasonable people.
It doesn't make Semenya run fast though. His biology indicates that he is a mediocre 800m male runner. The question is, why doesn't he race the men, accept the competition and what he has to do in order to be competitive, and see if he can make a semi final in the appropriate race? Why not challenge himself and race fairly?
What is it that makes him female enough to run in a race designed for women because of the biological differences between the sexes? Being accidently raised as a girl? He's got over that now. He has enjoyed a lengthy education at university and as an athlete supported by the state. This is a farce, and as usual, it is women that suffer because people like you don't like women, want to oppress them and feel threatened by their achievements.
And you actually think its not 100% obvious. Pathetic.
Nerd Vengeance wrote:
When social misfits that are the SJWs look at the W800 finish and see gender misfits making the women that have the looks of their "oppressors", i.e. the cute, popular girls of their youth, cry in despair, it brings a song to their dark, twisted, starved little hearts.
^ This!
It's a man's world, baby. If there's an athletic contest giving out awards, it should be men getting those awards, even if it's the "women" category. Let the biologically female fairer sex stay home and have babies. Sports are no place for them.
Jaqeme wrote:
They're MEN. They have XY chromosomes, not two X chromosomes. It's 1000 times more unfair than doping. What the hell does this have to do with ignorance?
/thread
The ignorance is on those who are too stupid to get it.
macdaddy wrote:
celery wrote:My favorite part of this event was the athlete introduction.... they showed Jozwik blow a kiss to the camera.
...I'm so glad Jozwik took the opportunity to show what a fully female athlete is like.
LOL. That's what it takes to be a "fully female athlete"?
You gotta be kidding me.
+1 that's pretty stupid evidence of femininity....seriously blowing kisses?
Jaqeme wrote:
They're MEN. They have XY chromosomes, not two X chromosomes. It's 1000 times more unfair than doping. What the hell does this have to do with ignorance?
Why is it so hard for intersexed men to understand this, and why do they keep calling themselves women, when they are men, and not women at all.
Maybe it is because they think just thinking they want to be women makes them women. Therefore any gay man who wants to think a woman just goes ahead, calls himself a woman, pretends to be a woman, and wants to compete against women. After all, for physical competitions this is easier for men to do then to compete against men. But that does not make it right, no more right then it ever was right, because it never was right, it is wrong, and it has always been wrong.
If there's a sin, then men trying to run in women's competitions is a sin.
TheRealDMC wrote:
Those three WOMAN have worked harder and endured more than you will in your entire life.
If you really feel empathy for the 3 women whose medals were stolen by them by 3 freaks, then you should be standing up for them, instead of standing up for the freaks, i.e. the people on exhibition as an example of a strange deviation from nature, i.e. monsters who should be in a different event, but are forcing their way into a women's event where they don't belong.
I hope karma comes back to bite you in the ass for your hateful views and inability to see the world for what it is. A world of different but equally beautiful people no matter what their chromosomes say or how they look or who they love.
The men who invade women's events are not so beautiful, they are freaks. If you don't want them to be freaks, then keep them out of the women's events.
Oh so now it is a sin for Caster to be herself is it? I think she has probably endured more hate and confusion than anyone here. If running a race in the sex she is identified with brings her a bit of joy, then we should respect that
Nerd Vengeance wrote:
When social misfits that are the SJWs look at the W800 finish and see gender misfits making the women that have the looks of their "oppressors", i.e. the cute, popular girls of their youth, cry in despair, it brings a song to their dark, twisted, starved little hearts.
jamin wrote:
^ This!
celery wrote:
My favorite part of this event was the athlete introduction.... they showed Jozwik blow a kiss to the camera.
I'm so glad Jozwik took the opportunity to show what a fully female athlete is like.
macdaddy wrote:
LOL. That's what it takes to be a "fully female athlete"?
You gotta be kidding me.
I concur wrote:
+1 that's pretty stupid evidence of femininity....seriously blowing kisses?
Yes, women with love and compassion,
real women who run in women's events because they are women,
and which you don't comprehend.
Monsters, freaks you call them. They may not look pretty to you, but it is you who is the hateful monster. Sadly, you seem to represent the majority opinion of this website.
Justice4caster wrote:
Oh so now it is a sin for Caster to be himself is it?
When he's being a freak and invading the women's events, then yes he's committing a sin.
I think he has probably endured more hate and confusion than anyone here. If running a race in the sex he is identified with brings him a bit of joy, then we should respect that
When he runs with the men, then I'll respect him for that.
When you seek justice for women, then I'll respect you for that.
But I cannot will not respect either of you for being monsters and creeps.
Justice4caster wrote:
Monsters, freaks you call them. They may not look pretty to you, but it is you who is the hateful monster. Sadly, you seem to represent the majority opinion of this website.
Yes they are Monsters, and you are a monster.
Dictionary.com
Freak: a person on exhibition as an example of a strange deviation from nature; monster.
No, they are not pretty to me, they are monsters, putting themselves on example as strange deviations from nature, not women, but pretending to be women and invading the women's events, instead of running with the men.
It is them you are the hateful monsters, and you, all of you being hateful to all real women in the world and not having any compassion for them, only focusing on your own hateful brutality. If I represent the majority opinion of this website, then bravo. The sooner you are out of the women's events, the better.
Monsters and Freaks wrote:
Dictionary.com
Freak: a person on exhibition as an example of a strange deviation from nature; monster.
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday