35 sex assaults of young girls at Swedish concert....by guess who?

smile wrote:

Instead, he thinks I'm some sort of bigot who thinks all Muslims are rapists. And as such, he thinks I'm merely capitalizing on the widespread sexual assault of European women by refugees as an opportunity to demonize all Muslims as people.

First line is faulty inference.

Second line is true.

smile wrote:

surely? wrote:

The dept. of justice doesn't record all instances of attempted rape or actual rape. Are you stupid?

No, I'm not stupid. Though it's unsurprising you would characterize me as such. This is what irrational people tend to do when faced with disagreement. They get angry, attribute negative characteristics to the people with whom they disagree, and call them names. This also tends to happen more online because the veil of anonymity removes the consequences that bad behavior typically carries.

surely? wrote:

So many girls, as in the vast majority, do not report these crimes to the police for a number of reasons.

According to the Department of Justice, 80% of the sexual assaults of college women go unreported.

So that bumps up the rate of sexual assault to 3.05% from 1995 - 2013 and 2.4% from 2010 - 2013.

I.e., still not a rape culture. Sorry.

What if these SJWs can't keep perpetuating the rape culture myth? What are these wannabe activists gonna rage against? I mean, who cares about massive waves of mid-80 IQ people with no skills invading your country, carrying out terrorist attacks, and supplanting Western civilization? C'mon, there are microaggressions to worry about here!

Islam is not the most evil religion, but its adherents are the least reformed. No way the actions of Muslims in modern times are excusable.

Stagger Lee wrote:

What if these SJWs can't keep perpetuating the rape culture myth? What are these wannabe activists gonna rage against? I mean, who cares about massive waves of mid-80 IQ people with no skills invading your country, carrying out terrorist attacks, and supplanting Western civilization? C'mon, there are microaggressions to worry about here!

Deny deny deny

Minimize minimize minimize

Ignore ignore ignore

Wait, are we talking about Muslim perps? Oh well in that case...

No comment about how the Republicans in the House continue to do business the Hastert way?

gggggggggggg wrote:

Stagger Lee wrote:

What if these SJWs can't keep perpetuating the rape culture myth? What are these wannabe activists gonna rage against? I mean, who cares about massive waves of mid-80 IQ people with no skills invading your country, carrying out terrorist attacks, and supplanting Western civilization? C'mon, there are microaggressions to worry about here!

Deny deny deny

Minimize minimize minimize

Ignore ignore ignore

Wait, are we talking about Muslim perps? Oh well in that case...

Unfortunately, your tactics don't work like they used to. When reality doesn't fit your worldview, well, just deny reality. I feel sorry for your ilk. Self-hatred is a terrible thing.

Weird that you're replying to a post that was directed at someone else.

It "debunked" it because the methodology was inaccurate. This survey considered sex while intoxicated as rape. This is the sort of masturbation of language third wave feminists use to define rape, i.e., nonsense.

The study that produced the 1 in 5 statistic was from a survey which examined the responses of 5000 women and 1000 men at two universities. The study that I cited examined the responses of 160,000 people.

The only individuals interested in splitting the difference between an accurate study like the one I cited and an inaccurate study like the one you cited are those (read: you) interested in inflating the actual numbers.

No, you don't wonder.

You've attributed imagined views to me, i.e., all Muslims are rapists, and think I'm using the widespread sexual assault of European women as a means of expressing such views, rather than what I'm actually doing, which is being honest about the problem.

jjjjjj wrote:

No comment about how the Republicans in the House continue to do business the Hastert way?

Did I miss something? Is someone on here defending, excusing or diminishing what Hastert did?

The first two paragraphs clearly state that the initial reports that these assaults were perpetrated by refugees were not only wrong but were changed within hours of the initial reports. So this entire 6+ page thread is based on something that was inaccurate and corrected days ago. If you bothered to read the article the final quote from the Swedish police "These are all young men" would give you your common denominator. It has nothing to do with religion, or immigrant status, or anything else except for a bunch of boys who went to the Brock Turner school of dating.

gggggggggggg wrote:

smile wrote:

Instead, he thinks I'm some sort of bigot who thinks all Muslims are rapists.

First line is faulty inference.

Nope. It's spot on.

gggggggggggg wrote:

smile wrote:

And as such, he thinks I'm merely capitalizing on the widespread sexual assault of European women by refugees as an opportunity to demonize all Muslims as people.

Second line is true.

Indeed. It is true that you think that. And as I pointed out, it doesn't map onto reality.

Again, this is the hallmark of the regressive left. Demonize those who disagree with you via attributing to them nefarious views that they don't actually hold.

MM3307 wrote:

The first two paragraphs clearly state that the initial reports that these assaults were perpetrated by refugees were not only wrong but were changed within hours of the initial reports. So this entire 6+ page thread is based on something that was inaccurate and corrected days ago. If you bothered to read the article the final quote from the Swedish police "These are all young men" would give you your common denominator. It has nothing to do with religion, or immigrant status, or anything else except for a bunch of boys who went to the Brock Turner school of dating.

But we know that the authorities are actively trying to cover up crimes committed by Muslim refugees as a matter of policy, so if the source is the "Swedish police", then it's not reliable. The only way to get reliable information about immigrant and Muslim crime from these fascist societies is through independent news sites.

Gary, can you please explain why it is ok to seek out and kill children?

I'd like to know before I learn about it through independent news sites.

MM3307 wrote:

The first two paragraphs clearly state that the initial reports that these assaults were perpetrated by refugees were not only wrong but were changed within hours of the initial reports. So this entire 6+ page thread is based on something that was inaccurate and corrected days ago. If you bothered to read the article the final quote from the Swedish police "These are all young men" would give you your common denominator. It has nothing to do with religion, or immigrant status, or anything else except for a bunch of boys who went to the Brock Turner school of dating.

No it didn't. It didn't say any such thing. Nor did she site any sources for her information. All she said was that the initial statement was "taken down". What does that mean exactly? She was very choosy in her words and what she quoted to help her with the message she wanted to deliver. She wasn't putting any effort into factual accuracy or detail.

If you actually did research you will see that the error they made was saying that all 7 suspects (in one of the two festivals at which sexual assaults occurred) were all "unaccompanied minors". That was the error. It turns out that only 2 of the 7 were "unaccompanied minors". The other 5 have not been identified as refugees or immigrants or locals and the police in Sweden generally refuse to do so. The only error being clarified here was that they were not unaccompanied minors. That's it. Is it possible that all 7 suspects are immigrants or refugees? Yes, it is.

Also -to be clear - the 17 year old in the original story, clearly said she was molested by immigrants - we do not know if the 7 suspects arrested include the "immigrants" who molested her.

You need to stop being an idiot. You have an agenda, good for you, but it is not based on fact but what you want to believe. Is it possible that people other than refugees/immigrants were involved in the sexual assaults? Yes - but what we do know, is that for certain the some suspects are and witnesses have identified being attacked by immigrants . It could well be that all of the people involved were "immigrants", time will tell - although I'm sure interest will die away before we know the answer.

The one thing that can't be asserted right now - is that no immigrants were involved. Quite the opposite. Based on suspects and victim testimony, they were involved. So - time for you to stop with your agenda or do better research to back up the view your are trying to push on everyone.

smile wrote:

gggggggggggg wrote:

First line is faulty inference.

Nope. It's spot on.

gggggggggggg wrote:

Second line is true.

Indeed. It is true that you think that. And as I pointed out, it doesn't map onto reality.

Again, this is the hallmark of the regressive left. Demonize those who disagree with you via attributing to them nefarious views that they don't actually hold.

Please explain how you were demonized?

Do you always play the victim card?

not impressed wrote:

Islam is not the most evil religion, but its adherents are the least reformed. No way the actions of Muslims in modern times are excusable.

It is worst religion. No other beheading children. Gutter religion as Jesse might say.

Hillary for rapefugees wrote:

Luckily, in November the American people will vote for a staunch supporter of sexual predators. She likes them so much she's even married to one.

Compared to Trump who is being investigated for raping numerous 13 year olds. And who has been pegged as a rapist by his ex-wife. No big deal tho.

What a choice we have!

smile wrote:

Nope. Rapefugees.

Not surprised you hadn't heard about it though. European leaders are doing a good job covering it up in the media and preventing citizens from criticizing it via hate speech laws.

Thank heavens there's an ocean between us and them.

So you only have a problem with refugees independent of other attributes? Only refugee status, yes? If so, I am sorry. So very sorry.

The Swedish media thought they had successfully covered up the gang rape of a young Swedish girl inside a flat in Malmberget, situated in the municipality of Gällivare, according to news outlet Fjällsjö news. Facebook promptly censored the posts of the family friend, in an attempt to further silence the story

In another post, she states:

According to SIX people who know the girl’s family, there was a large group of Muslim men involved in the horrific and brutal rape.

As the media did not report on the attack, since it was commit by Muslim migrants, the post on Facebook quickly gained attention. Facebook promptly censored the posts of the family friend, in an attempt to further silence the story.

However, local politicians have blamed ethnic Swedes for not helping the migrants successfully integrate into Swedish society.