EmilyPost wrote:This young fellow could say his "exposure" was inadvertent and it was the publishing of it that is the crime.
Inadvertent? Only if they play football in g-strings. It was a dumb prank and he's responsible for it. Blaming the yearbook editors or adviser for a successful prank is putting the responsibility in the wrong place.
The official overreaction is still foolishness. The police should never have been involved in this.
yaaah wrote:
EmilyPost wrote:This young fellow could say his "exposure" was inadvertent and it was the publishing of it that is the crime.Inadvertent? Only if they play football in g-strings. It was a dumb prank and he's responsible for it. Blaming the yearbook editors or adviser for a successful prank is putting the responsibility in the wrong place.
Obviously the exposure wasn't inadvertent, but how did this not get spotted by the yearbook staff? I imagine that dozens of people see the publication before it goes to print. Since football is a fall sport, it isn't like the picture was taken at the last minute and thrown in right as the thing was finalized.
It is the kid's fault and I'm not going to say that the yearbook committed a crime, but it is sloppy work.
yaaah wrote:
EmilyPost wrote:This young fellow could say his "exposure" was inadvertent and it was the publishing of it that is the crime.Inadvertent? Only if they play football in g-strings. It was a dumb prank and he's responsible for it. Blaming the yearbook editors or adviser for a successful prank is putting the responsibility in the wrong place.
The official overreaction is still foolishness. The police should never have been involved in this.
They dropped the charges against this kid today.
Pretty much every other country deals with that situation as a public order offence, not a sex offence. Ticket with a fine and done.
sloppy work wrote:
yaaah wrote:Inadvertent? Only if they play football in g-strings. It was a dumb prank and he's responsible for it. Blaming the yearbook editors or adviser for a successful prank is putting the responsibility in the wrong place.
Obviously the exposure wasn't inadvertent, but how did this not get spotted by the yearbook staff? I imagine that dozens of people see the publication before it goes to print. Since football is a fall sport, it isn't like the picture was taken at the last minute and thrown in right as the thing was finalized.
It is the kid's fault and I'm not going to say that the yearbook committed a crime, but it is sloppy work.
I didn't say it was inadvertent, I said he could claim it as a defense.. They were at a team picture day... so he didn't wear a jock or a cup for that. he was going COMMANDO.
It's a little late to claim the "wardrobe malfunction" defense since he already admitted he did it as a prank.
The world of no tolerance wrote:
A huge overreaction to fairly harmless juvenile stupidity.
Right... now they say it was no big thing... and they set him free...
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Guys between age of 45 and 55 do you think about death or does it seem far away
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06