Cunliffe 10.99 legal in first 100m for Ducks

It's called getting on the gear. You don't improve by a half second suddenly in the 100 meters without some chemical asistance.

This. I saw her run this past weekend and her body now has that unnaturally ripped look.

People don't know this but she was almost as fast as she is now her senior year of high school but then she had a big injury that set her back a lot at the very beginning of the season. She didn't "improve" from then to now as much as people think. Just because a time isn't on record in a meet doesn't mean she hasn't run that fast or close to that fast before.

Hmm, a simple lookup of her bio on the Oregon team website lists her PR before the season started as 11.58 so I have no idea what high high school times you're talking about. Please don't come back with non-fully automatic times or wind aided marks.

times that she ran at practice not in a meet. Ive seen her timed in practice. If you don't want to think they are legit then fine but its not surprising to me seeing her break sub 11 after seeing the times she ran in practice in high school.

AW Pharmacy wrote:

This. I saw her run this past weekend and her body now has that unnaturally ripped look.

I have examined your writing today and it has a cretinesque quality

Amazing what you can find at letsrun

Yeah, I know...huge time improvement, changes to her body...nothing to see here, move along. How dare anyone point it out. Oh and this just in: the African distance runners are all clean also.

Stop lying. She ran wind-aided 11.40 and 11.41 in high school, and the fastest of those converts to the same 11.58 that her bio lists. She did NOT run faster than that before. Also, the reason she left Oklahoma was that Kevin Tyler, her coach, left for ALTIS, and Tyler had coached a world indoor championship gold medalist. Tyler is not chopped liver as a coach. Progressions like this only happen at Oregon (English Gardner went from 11.56 to 11.03 as a freshman an Oregon).

Oregon = East Germany

lol, I'm not lying but ok. If you don't want to believe me then cool idc. My point is simply that sometimes you cannot get a 100% complete picture of a person's progression just by looking at the times they run on record in meets.

coach d wrote:

Stop lying. She ran wind-aided 11.40 and 11.41 in high school, and the fastest of those converts to the same 11.58 that her bio lists. She did NOT run faster than that before. Also, the reason she left Oklahoma was that Kevin Tyler, her coach, left for ALTIS, and Tyler had coached a world indoor championship gold medalist. Tyler is not chopped liver as a coach. Progressions like this only happen at Oregon (English Gardner went from 11.56 to 11.03 as a freshman an Oregon).

Oregon = East Germany

And your heroine Caryl Smith is a proverbial slaughterhouse for sprinters. Everyone at USC who isn't hurt is going backwards. How do you explain the disastrous state of that program?

Isn't it tine for SC to clean house and start over? Or is smith still letting you do laundry on away meet weekends?

I have been around track a long time but have never seen even one sprinter who ran 0.6 seconds faster for 100m in practice than their meet PR. Not even hand timed vs FAT or wind aided vs non-wind aided.

coach d wrote:

Stop lying. She ran wind-aided 11.40 and 11.41 in high school, and the fastest of those converts to the same 11.58 that her bio lists. She did NOT run faster than that before. Also, the reason she left Oklahoma was that Kevin Tyler, her coach, left for ALTIS, and Tyler had coached a world indoor championship gold medalist. Tyler is not chopped liver as a coach. Progressions like this only happen at Oregon (English Gardner went from 11.56 to 11.03 as a freshman an Oregon).

Oregon = East Germany

She only ran once last year outdoors at Oklahoma before coach Genius booted her out of the program.

Her improvement is over a two year period. So was English Gardner's. She didn't run in high school because of ACL surgery. But what the hell, why should the facts get in the way of a good defamation from an a$$ hole like you.

Oh and enjoy:

LOL dem haters will hate that what happens when Oregon wins so many National Champions in track keep up the great work Hannah and coach Taylor. Also I would love to see Oregon recruit a sprinter or 2 on the Men's side. U$C gets faster recruits then Oregon yet makes it's runners slower in College or injured and Oregon gets slower recruits and makes them faster in College. Awesome to see Oregon take 1,2,3 in both the 100 and 200 at Pac 12's and just dominate U$C runners from a "sprint" school. U$C ruins sprinters like Stanford ruins middle distance and distance Runners that is why they can get higher rated recruits then Oregon yet be owned for what 10 straight years by Oregon on the Men's side and 8 straight years on the Women's side at Pac 12. GO DUCKS

Idc wrote:

I have been around track a long time but have never seen even one sprinter who ran 0.6 seconds faster for 100m in practice than their meet PR. Not even hand timed vs FAT or wind aided vs non-wind aided.

ashley henderson? 11.84 hs to 11.64 to 11.01

get off your a$$ and do some research before you open your piehole

Maybe you should read and understand the comment before you open yours.

Not sure we are ready for this

http://www.milesplit.com/articles/244143/chloe-cunliffe-vaults-new-washington-state-record

Tied for top 10 all-time