1 Wind: 1.7
1 Jenna Prandini Puma 10.95
2 Hannah Cunliffe Oregon 10.99
3 Miki Barber TAG 11.10
4 Kim Duncan HSI 11.11
Cunliffe is now #8 NCAA all-time. Incredible. One of the most remarkable school transfer stories ever.
1 Wind: 1.7
1 Jenna Prandini Puma 10.95
2 Hannah Cunliffe Oregon 10.99
3 Miki Barber TAG 11.10
4 Kim Duncan HSI 11.11
Cunliffe is now #8 NCAA all-time. Incredible. One of the most remarkable school transfer stories ever.
How many more "Hannah Cunliffe is hot" threads are we going to have between now and the Olympic Trials?
How many more "Hannah Cunliffe is hot" threads are we going to have between now and the Olympic Trials?
We haven't had any and not likely. She isn't hot.
Big wind, but thats good improvement for her.
Big wind really I thought the legal wind was anything under 2.0 ?????????
10.99 is a huge improvement in the 100m for her from previous years. They flat out can coach talented sprinters at Oregon. The wind is helpful but legal--sub 11s in April is auspicious, to say the least.
COmes back for a big 200 PR as well...less wind
1 Deajah Stevens Oregon 22.61
2 Hannah Cunliffe Oregon 22.71
3 Deanna Hill USC 22.94
4 Tynia Gaither USC 23.18
5 Mahagony Jones New Balance 23.34
6 DeeDee Trotter Run4People 23.56
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/647683/Hannah-CunliffeNone is enough wrote:
How many more "Hannah Cunliffe is hot" threads are we going to have between now and the Olympic Trials?We haven't had any and not likely. She isn't hot.
Wish I could have seen it. The Flotrack feed was especially bad today.
Seriously mate? wrote:
How many more "Hannah Cunliffe is hot" threads are we going to have between now and the Olympic Trials?
Not enough.
Her face is a matter of opinion but that bod is undeniable.
Cunliffe is smoking hot wow. :) Also look at how much faster she is at Oregon then even just a year ago at Oklahoma. Her PR in the 100 before Oregon 11.5 something a huge huge improvement. What funny is that U$C seems to get higher rated/faster recruits on the Women's side every year and Oregon well they beat U$C every single year on the sprints. from 100-800. Oregon makes it's recruits on the sprints minus Sant way way faster in College U$C makes then slower or keeps them with the same times that they had in High School.
So is Sant redshirting? I remember when both she and Hannah were AG phenoms.
Images 5 and 24:
is Cunliffe clean?
Is any sub-10 woman sprinter clean? She was a phenom at 15. If she is suspect, so is Prandini, Gardner, etc.etc.
doper? wrote:
is Cunliffe clean?
Ha meant sub-11 (also sub-10 men)
Turbogeezr wrote:
Is any sub-10 woman sprinter clean? She was a phenom at 15. If she is suspect, so is Prandini, Gardner, etc.etc.
doper? wrote:is Cunliffe clean?
I like to say no, but the naive side of me tries to give athlete these days the benefit of the doubt. Where would an university track program get their drugs from?
I read somewhere Oregon is going for the NCAA record in the 4 by 1 I think the record is 42.36 and Oregon has run 42.68 so not too far off. Damn if Prandini didn't go pro a year early the NCAA record would be a lock for Oregon now mind you they could still get it without her it will just be a little more difficult. Whats awesome in a couple of years the U.S. Women's 4 by 1 team could be all Oregon Ducks Gardner,Todd,Prandini,Cunliffe WOW Oregon is now sprint U I mean last year 3/4 of the U.S. team were current or former Ducks Todd,Prandini,Gardner GO DUCKS
Rotegoat wrote:
Her face is a matter of opinion but that bod is undeniable.
You be the judge:
http://www.dyestatcollege.com/gprofile.php?mgroup_id=87&do=videos&video_id=173240